Atlantis Online
October 28, 2021, 12:13:27 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Comet theory collides with Clovis research, may explain disappearance of ancient people
http://uscnews.sc.edu/ARCH190.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Woodstock, New York, takes on global warming

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Woodstock, New York, takes on global warming  (Read 313 times)
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« on: April 12, 2007, 02:10:44 am »

Woodstock, New York, takes on global warming
POSTED: 8:19 a.m. EDT, April 9, 2007
Story Highlights
Woodstock, New York, has plan to erase the town's "carbon footprint" by 2017
Residents can keep cars if they produce enough clean power to offset emissions
Woodstock is best known for the 1969 rock concert that borrowed its name

 
 
WOODSTOCK, New York (AP) -- Michael Esposito rides his bike all the time -- from cold nights when leaving his old job at a natural food store to warm days while passing shops selling yoga clothes and soy drinks.

So the 67-year-old is excited about a new plan to reduce this countercultural haven's net carbon dioxide emissions to zero within a decade, an ambitious attempt to erase the town's "carbon footprint."

"It's more than important," Esposito said. "It's a necessity."
The goal might sound as unlikely as stuffing smoke back into a smokestack. Even sympathetic experts call it challenging. It likely would require many of the town's roughly 6,200 people to install solar panels and geothermal hookups. But it's tough to find a resident who doesn't support the project.

"So why not declare that within 10 years we're going to set a visionary goal?" asked Randolph Horner, a renewable energy project developer who is a driving force behind the initiative.

Woodstock is best known for the 1969 rock concert that borrowed its name and was held some 50 miles away in Bethel. But the old artists' colony is plugging firmly into the zeitgeist of 2007, a time when hybrid cars are hot and Al Gore's climate-change documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth," won two Oscars.

As debate over the scope of global warming continues, local officials across the country have crafted their own policies. Austin, Texas, has a "Climate Protection Plan" that aims to make city buildings reliant on renewable energy by 2012. Portland, Oregon, has an Office of Sustainable Development to coordinate and encourage the use of everything from green building to biofuels.

Last month, the Woodstock town board approved a nonbinding resolution that called for "implementing policies resulting in no net emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases" by 2017.

"Net" means residents can keep their cars as long as they produce enough clean power to offset their emissions.
The resolution lists ways to reach the zero carbon goal, including green building, bike paths, tree planting and biodiesel municipal fleets.

It's the sort of bit-by-bit approach advocated by environmentalists. For instance, one person driving 2,000 fewer miles prevents about a ton of carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere. And a compact fluorescent bulb will keep half a ton of carbon dioxide out of the air over its lifetime, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The savings are a wisp compared with the billions of tons of greenhouse gases released annually, but the idea is to reach meaningful reductions through collective action.

Horner said consumer efficiencies should be coupled with onsite generation like solar power. Geothermal heating and cooling systems would take a bite out the town's appetite for fossil fuel, he said.

Renewable energy experts say the goal is technically possible but difficult. Michael Armstrong, a policy analyst with Portland's Office of Sustainability, called net zero a "monstrous challenge."

But Horner insists that as fossil fuel prices spike over the next decade, alternative energy will become more attractive to both producers and residential consumers. Solar panels and geothermal systems will make more sense economically, he said.

Woodstock has some advantages big cities like Portland or Austin don't. It's a rural town with no heavy industry, and residents generally tend to be more sympathetic to save-the-planet ideas.

Those asked about the plan were all supportive of the general idea.
"Climate change is serious. We can't stick our heads in the ground," Norm Wennet said.
"What's not to like? How could anybody be against it?" Robin Kramer asked. "I'm just skeptical that it will work."
Kramer said he supports the effort, but doubts people will cut down on driving and make other sacrifices necessary to reach the goal.

Jim Decker, a member of the group charged with coming up with more concrete plans, says one potential problem could be enlisting the many people from New York City who keep weekend homes in Woodstock.

And even residents who support the plan are foggy about how to wipe out their carbon footprint.
Alan Carey said he switched to compact fluorescent bulbs, burns more wood and tries to drive less.
"I don't know if we can do it," Carey said, "but we're going to try."
Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/04/09/zero.carbon.woodstock.ap/index.html
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2007, 02:11:48 am »

Huge concert to raise climate awareness
POSTED: 12:03 p.m. EDT, April 10, 2007
Story Highlights
"Live Earth" concerts to raise climate change awareness
Shows to be in London, Shanghai, Tokyo, among other places
Bon Jovi, Dave Matthews Band, Kanye West to play U.S. show

 
 
LONDON, England (AP) -- Live Earth concerts will be held July 7 in cities around the world, including London, aimed at raising climate change awareness.

Madonna, the Beastie Boys and Black Eyed Peas will headline the concert at Wembley stadium in London. They will be joined by the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Keane, Foo Fighters and others.

Headliners for the U.S. concert at Giants Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, include Bon Jovi, Dave Matthews Band, Kanye West, Rihanna, John Mayer, Smashing Pumpkins and Fall Out Boy, it was announced Tuesday.

Other shows will take place in Shanghai, China; Johannesburg, South Africa; Sydney, Australia; Tokyo; and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Organizers have also promised an event in Antarctica.
The concerts mark the start of a new campaign called Save Our Selves, The Campaign for a Climate in Crisis.
"This monster lineup will ensure Live Earth meets our goal of bringing together people from around the world to combat the climate crisis," Live Earth Founder and Executive Producer Kevin Wall said in a statement Tuesday. "Musicians who have answered our call span multiple genres and generations."

The concerts will be broadcast in the U.S. by General Electric Co.'s NBC network and on more than 120 networks around the world, and streamed live online.

Promoters hope the concerts will reach an audience of 2 billion people. Proceeds will create a foundation to combat climate change led by The Alliance for Climate Protection, which is chaired by former Vice President Al Gore.

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Music/04/10/music.liveearth.ap/index.html
http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/environment/?cnn=yes

Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2007, 09:54:47 am »

New York is doing great things for the environment.

1st They raise taxes so high that industries can't survive.  So no more industrial pollution.

2nd  The Enviro-Fascist Lobby loves making sure that our check engine light is off and has no problem implementing costly pollution control tests that all vehicles must pass or they won't get on the road.

3.  New York also stifles job creation so more people have to leave the state, less jobs means less polluters.

4.  Then the politicians here act like they're doing us a favor when an ethanol 85 plant moves in.

That's why I say...

I  L  Angry athe New York.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2007, 03:47:04 pm by Volitzer » Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy