Atlantis Online
May 17, 2022, 03:51:50 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

The shocking claim mystery skulls 'found in Antarctica could be from aliens'

Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: The shocking claim mystery skulls 'found in Antarctica could be from aliens'  (Read 144 times)
Crystal Thielkien
Superhero Member
Posts: 4531

« on: December 18, 2018, 04:35:17 pm »

The shocking claim mystery skulls 'found in Antarctica could be from aliens'
IT WAS a mind-blowing announcement - that not only had remains of historic inhabitants of Antarctica been found, but at the same time they could be from aliens.
By Jon Austin
03:16, Tue, Jul 26, 2016 | UPDATED: 13:49, Tue, Jul 26, 2016

The story went viral online, claiming that three ancient skulls were unearthed by a team of archaeologists.

It was seen as mind-blowing, not only because it was thought at the time Antarctica was first reached by humans, in 1820, hundreds of years after the suspected age of the skulls, but also because they were "elongated with giant craniums", leading some commentators to claim they could have been the remains of aliens who visted Earth.

The reports claim that an archaeologist called Damian Waters and his team uncovered the skulls in a region of Antarctica called La Paille.

They were hailed initially as the first human remains uncovered from Antarctica, before it changed to the first remains of aliens found on Earth.

Mr Waters, allegedly an archaeologist from Smithsonian Institute of New York, reportedly said after the alleged discovery in 2014: "We just canít believe it. We didnít just find human remains on Antarctica, we found elongated skulls.

"I have to pinch myself every time I wake up, I just canít believe it.
Promoted Story

    You could save $668 on car insurance by switching to Progressive You could save $668 on car insurance by switching to Progressive (Progressive)

"This will redefine our view of mankindís history as a whole.Ē

One of the alleged Antarctic elongated skulls compared to a standard human skull.YouTube
One of the alleged Antarctic elongated skulls compared to a standard human skull.
Related articles

    WATCH: Has an alien skeleton been unearthed at Russia's Stonehenge?
    Mysterious huge-eyed skull believed to have 'belonged to an alien'

Elongated skulls have been found in Peru, Egypt and other areas with an ancient historical past.

While many conspiracy theorists point to them of alien visitations of Earth over the centuries, they have been explained away as a bizarre practice by some ancient civilisations, to extend the length of the skull through manipulation from an early age.

Conspiracy theory websites reported at the time about the Antarctica skulls: "It shows there was contact thousand of years ago between civilisations in Africa, South America and Antarctica.

"These elongated skulls are much, much larger than normal human skulls would be.

"Purposeful cranial deformation can change the shape of a skull, but it cannot increase the volume of the skull.

"In addition, these skulls have quite a few other important physical characteristics that greatly set them apart from normal human skulls

Archaeologists on the alleged dig from a YouTube video backing the story.YouTube
Archaeologists on the alleged dig from a YouTube video backing the story.
Related articles

    Proof of aliens? UFO-hunter 'found human-like skulls on Mars'
    Elongated 'alien skulls' from Earth now 'found on Mars'

    I have to pinch myself every time I wake up, I just canít believe it. This will redefine our view of mankindís history as a whole.

    Damian Water's (allegedly)

But aside from debates over whether the skulls were human or alien, there is now one over whether they were actually found.

It appears the story could be online Chinese whispers at their worst.

Sceptical website researched the origins of the story after becoming suspicious of the alleged comments made by Mr Waters.

The report said: "Well, first, I have a hard time imagining a scientist in a press conference telling the world how he has to pinch himself when he wakes up because he's so 'excited'.

"Secondly, there seems to be no region called La Paille in Antarctica. Paille is French for straw, something I haven't seen much of in photographs I've seen of Antarctica, so it's a little hard to see why someone would name a place down there La Paille."

Related articles

    Mystery of the 'alien skulls' and Nazi briefcase found in remote...
    Big Foot on Mars: Alien hunters make shock claim of Yeti skull find

Skeptophilia went on to say it found no record of a Damian Waters who works for the Smithsonian, other than in stories about these alien skulls.

The website said: "I suspect that he was made up, along with the skulls and La Paille and everything else about the story."

The report added: "It's a shame, really. Given the cachet that Antarctica has, it would be cool if there was some kind of weird mystery down there, or at least something other than penguins and leopard seals and high winds and a crapload of ice.

So it appears the whole thing was an elaborate hoax

But that doesn't appear to stop die-hard believers.

Scott C Waring, editor of blogged about the story today.

He wrote: "Aliens in Antartica...not so far fetched actually.

"Antartica's climate has changed a lot every 10,000 years. So yes its easy for an alien culture to live there and not freeze to death.

"Sure, its unusual that elongated skulls were found, especially since there have been many such discoveries in Peru, thousands of miles across the ocean. Overall, a great discovery."
Related articles

    Is skull found locked in a buried box proof of WEREWOLVES?
    Caves of death: Caverns littered with corpses & childrens' heads found in remote Scotland
    Could bizarre skulls with 'non-human' DNA be proof of aliens on Earth?

Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Crystal Thielkien
Superhero Member
Posts: 4531

« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2018, 04:36:12 pm »

    Frozen Continent Antarctica Archaeology

The bones that could shape Antarctica’s fate

In 30 years’ time, the treaty that maintains harmony in Antarctica will be up for review – could archaeological discoveries there influence the continent’s future?

    By Martha Henriques

22 October 2018

In 1985, a unique skull was discovered lying on Yamana Beach at Cape Shirreff in Antarctica’s South Shetland Islands. It belonged to an indigenous woman from southern Chile in her early 20s, thought to have died between 1819 and 1825. It was the oldest known human remains ever found in Antarctica.

The location of the discovered skull was unexpected. It was found at a beach camp made by sealers in the early 19th Century near remnants of her femur bone, yet female sealers were unheard of at the time. There are no surviving documents explaining how or why a young woman came to be in Antarctica during this era. Now, at nearly 200 years old, the skull is thought to align with the beginning of the first known landings on Antarctica.

Discover more from our 'Frozen Continent' series:

    The icy village where you must remove your appendix
    A frozen graveyard: The sad tales of Antarctica’s deaths
    The ship drilling into Antarctica’s warm and green past

The Yamana Beach skull was a significant find – and not just for archaeological reasons. In 30 years’ time, bones such as these may come into play in territorial claims for this pristine wilderness. Nations are quietly – and sometimes not so quietly – preparing to stake their rights as the owners of swathes of the nearly uninhabitable land.

"Lots of people just don't understand that there's a darker side to Antarctica," says Klaus Dodds, professor of geopolitics at Royal Holloway University of London. "What we're seeing is great power politics play out in a space that a lot of people think of as just frozen wastes."

The Antarctic Treaty System was first signed in 1959 but, in 1998 a protocol on environmental protection was added. It states that Antarctica is to be a "natural reserve, devoted to peace and science," and prohibits all activities relating to Antarctic mineral resources, except as is necessary for scientific research. But this is not set in stone forever.

In 2048 – 50 years after the protocol was created – this part of the treaty could come under review. That is the date when the prohibition on mining and resource extraction could – and it's a big could – be altered or done away with.

    People worry that the whole thing could unravel

"The reason 2048 looms large is because if certain countries feel that the prohibition on mineral exploitation is no longer to be respected, people worry that the whole thing could unravel," says Dodds. "Environmental protection is one of the key headlines of the treaty."

Seven nations laid overlapping claims on Antarctic land when the treaty was adopted: Argentina, Australia, Chile, France, New Zealand, Norway and the UK. The treaty held all these claims in place and prohibited any new ones from being established. The treaty also puts any expansions to territorial claims to Antarctica on hold – officially.

"The claimant states, in a sense, keep their claims in a box, if you like, with a lid on it. But that box will never be thrown away," says Jill Barrett, an international law consultant and visiting reader in international law at Queen Mary University of London.

Many nations, however, are engaging in 'doublethink' about this part of the agreement, says Dodds. "The big players, usually China and Russia, are thinking about this particular episode around 2048 and planning ahead."

As a result, many countries are sending feelers out to Antarctica in a number of ways, such as financing scientific research, historical investigation, and building research bases far and wide around the continent. "It's a very clear message to the wider world: we're in the whole space," says Dodds.

    Archaeology establishes an interest, if not a stake, in future discussions

Archaeology is one of the most important activities, says Michael Pearson, an Antarctic heritage consultant and former deputy executive director of the Australian Heritage Commission. "It establishes an interest, if not a stake, in future discussions about territorial claims or commercial exploitation."

While archaeological finds like the discovery of the Yamana Beach skull carry no legal weight – the woman was more likely to have been a sealer than an official – they might just challenge the known timeline of the continent’s history. If Chile can demonstrate that it had people living in Antarctica earlier than other nations staking land claims, then they have a stronger hand in negotiations.

Archaeological discoveries can also boost political support for a case back home. "When remains or objects are found in the ice, I could see straight away it would inflate territorial nationalism," says Dodds. "Archaeology has always been really important for national politics."

Other events, such as historic shipwrecks, could play a similar role as the Yamana skull. In 1819, the Spanish frigate San Telmo was wrecked in the Drake Passage, which separates the tip of Chile from the Antarctic Peninsula. Archaeologists have searched the Antarctic islands for signs of whether any crew made it alive to the shore.

"Shipwreck remains were found there washed up on the South Shetlands," says Pearson. "Quite possibly some of the crew survived on the floating wreckage." If there were survivors, they would have beaten the British to be the first in Antarctica.

The upside of all this attention is that a single nation’s investment in archaeology can reveal artefacts and remains that can enlighten the whole world – discoveries that might never otherwise have been found. "The underlying nationalistic ambitions of countries, be they overtly expressed or covert motivations, can be beneficial," says Pearson. "They provide funding and logistical support to carry out archaeological research, which is otherwise very hard to get."

For the Chilean woman whose skull was found on Yamana Beach, the most likely conclusion is that she was caught up somehow in a sealing mission to Antarctica. She may have drowned or died of exposure on the shore. But her bones remain among the most significant archaeological discoveries ever made in Antarctica. And they are now part of a much bigger picture of soft power and national pride, in the context of the political long-game of laying claim to the frozen continent.

Join 900,000+ Future fans by liking us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter or Instagram.

If you liked this story, sign up for the weekly features newsletter, called “If You Only Read 6 Things This Week”. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Capital, and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy