Atlantis Online
September 16, 2021, 07:37:01 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Hunt for Lost City of Atlantis
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3227295.stm
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Obama Debt Speech George Washington University April, 13 2011

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Obama Debt Speech George Washington University April, 13 2011  (Read 334 times)
Krista Davenport
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5018



« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2011, 10:44:25 pm »

As for helping the middle class, you don't think health care reform, extending tax cuts for the middle class, extending unemployment benefits, credit card reform and financial regulation doesn't help the middle class?

And when did you ever give a damn about black America?  He has a 90% approval rating for blacks, so obviously they're fine with him.

The comparisons to Hitler are laughable,  but I guess that's what all you conspiracy types do to anyone you don't like seeing as how you are all driven by FEAR.
Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2011, 04:29:33 pm »

As for helping the middle class, you don't think health care reform, extending tax cuts for the middle class, extending unemployment benefits, credit card reform and financial regulation doesn't help the middle class?

These are good, but it would be like taking the toppings off of an ice cream cone to reduce calories.

And when did you ever give a damn about black America?  He has a 90% approval rating for blacks, so obviously they're fine with him.

I care for any and all races affected by this fractional reserve debt slavery we are living under.  You ever watch the show Debt Almighty where Black Americans talk about the effects of debt by the banks on Black America.  The Pols and the people of Guernsey aren't debt slaves like Americans are Europeans are.  The people of Libya weren't either, whether they remain free of IMF rule remains to be seen.

Quote

The 2010 Coup d'etat in Poland - Regime Change by Decapitation


Polish elite were assassinated in a downed plane for not accepting the debt slavery of the € Euro. The Bilderberg "Project Mockingbird" media narrative says "fog" was to blame even though humidity was 60%, there was no forecast of fog, no eyewitness saw fog, and the video minutes after the assassination clearly shows no fog. The total and sudden extermination of dozens of high ranking officials included the president and wife, the head of the central bank (who was 100% opposed to the Euro), and multiple military commanders. Goldman Sachs "coincidently" landed in Warsaw two weeks before this coup. Just days before the attack, the now assassinated head of the central bank, via monetary policy, threatened the tough "mobster deals" that the EU and IMF were were imposing on Greece. It is important to also note that Goldman Sachs was very instrumental in destroying that EU member nation's economy. Poland is the only country out of the 27 member states of the EU to not suffer a recession this millennium. They are also the only country so opposed to the € Euro currency. The only head of state not assassinated is the Prime Minister of Poland who "coincidently" loves the € Euro and cannot wait to integrate his own country's powerful economy with the EU's failing economy. Adding fuel to the lack of fire 5 minutes after the incident, the PM declared that the fault concerning the extermination of these heads of state lies with Putin. Whether or not Putin has some blood on his hands concerning this event remains to be seen, but it is very odd that the PM would declare this openly prior to a thorough investigation and just hours after they signed a 50 year gas pipeline deal. Concerning the former President's enemies...Nicholas Sarkozy even went so far as to suggest that the EU kick out Poland until they accept the debt slavery creating currency and the head of the EU also considered Poland's central bank to be a "pebble in their shoe" concerning his agenda with implementing a continent-wide New World Order/IMF run monetary system. If cui bono and motive were ever important concerning a coup d'etat, they sure are now. Just like they were when NATO special operations assassinated Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro. 

If Black Americans approve of him it is only multi-racial-philia, if they were smart they would see Obama like Malcom X would.  A Puppet !!!

The comparisons to Hitler are laughable,  but I guess that's what all you conspiracy types do to anyone you don't like seeing as how you are all driven by FEAR.

The Obama Deception



Let's not forget how he wanted a civilian force just as well funded and just as strong as the military.  Funny how when the Hitlerian comparisons came out all over the internet and talk radio Obama backed off and the Obama Youth never happened.

Also his whole Council of 10 Governors to fit the FEMA's 10 Regions of America post 50 states plan as well.  Only a dicatator would want Governors to act as their regional Lieutenants.  Good thing the NAU plans got leaked and that never came to pass.

Obama would allow the right NWO false-flag operation to create enough of a crisis to allow him to become a dictator under the Constinuity of Government plan set in place under the NWO.  The NWO wanted to use it under Bush but the 9/11 Truther backlash kept that from happening. 



« Last Edit: April 16, 2011, 04:32:11 pm by Volitzer » Report Spam   Logged
Krista Davenport
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5018



« Reply #17 on: April 17, 2011, 12:14:46 am »

Quote
Let's not forget how he wanted a civilian force just as well funded and just as strong as the military.  Funny how when the Hitlerian comparisons came out all over the internet and talk radio Obama backed off and the Obama Youth never happened.

There was never any armed civilian force planned, that was another right wing lie. And you conspiracy theorists fell for it!

Quote
I care for any and all races affected by this fractional reserve debt slavery we are living under.

So you seriously think that black America's problems started under Obama?  
Most have to do with discrimination and NO MONEY being invested in their communities.  What have you done for black America if you are so concerned?

Quote
Also his whole Council of 10 Governors to fit the FEMA's 10 Regions of America post 50 states plan as well.  Only a dicatator would want Governors to act as their regional Lieutenants.  Good thing the NAU plans got leaked and that never came to pass.

Obama would allow the right NWO false-flag operation to create enough of a crisis to allow him to become a dictator under the Constinuity of Government plan set in place under the NWO.  The NWO wanted to use it under Bush but the 9/11 Truther backlash kept that from happening.  

Bush was the one to sign Executive Directive 50 making himself a dictator in times of crisis.  Obama must not be much of a threat as a dictator if you conspiracy guys can stop all these plans that no one has ever heard of before he even announces anything about them.

You want to fight against would be dictators?  Get a clue. Go to Wisconsin, or Ohio or Michigan where those guys are all signing REAL legislation to make themselves dictators of their states.  Don't go ****ing about imaginary policies just cause you don't like the color of his skin.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2011, 12:16:13 am by Krista Davenport » Report Spam   Logged
Jade Hellene
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 3488



« Reply #18 on: April 19, 2011, 11:55:11 pm »


Sam Stein
Sam Stein stein@huffingtonpost.com Become a fan of this reporter

Obama's Deficit Speech Planned Months In Advance As Part Of Far-Reaching Effort



WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama’s much discussed speech last week on how to remedy the country’s fiscal future was part of a far broader, more strategically detailed political strategy than has been previously reported.

Several high-ranking administration officials have confirmed that the White House laid out plans for the address as far back as the last calendar year, with the president’s economic team and other senior staff members “meeting regularly since February to put the policy together and work on the speech.”

In presenting a fiscal roadmap, the administration aimed to demonstrate Obama's fundamental seriousness towards what is widely perceived to be a looming deficit crisis. But the speech also illuminated both the lack of communication between the White House and Capitol Hill and a growing conviction among insiders that the president must move the deficit debate off center stage in order to tackle other domestic priorities.

The address, delivered at George Washington University last Wednesday, outlined an expansive approach towards leveling the federal government’s balance sheet. Obama expressed a need for simplifying the tax code and raising the rates on the highest earners. He called for a “debt fail-safe” trigger, mandating Congress to pass across-the-board spending reductions if the nation’s debt does not decline. He advocated stronger cuts in the Pentagon’s budget and less waste in Medicare.

His remarks, in all, were positively received by Democrats and derided as partisan waste by Republicans.

Yet build-up to the speech illustrated more than reactions to it. Capitol Hill officials, including the White House's top allies, say they were left completely in the dark. No one, it appears, knew Obama would deliver an address until his top aide, David Plouffe, announced plans on the Sunday shows. Key aides were briefed on its content only days (if not hours) before the president took the stage.

“Members and staffs had no idea what they were going to say until about four hours before the speech—three days after the speech was announced," said a senior Senate Democratic aide. "It was pretty ham-handed in its roll out and members weren't pleased."
Report Spam   Logged

Sort through the media disinformation:
http://mediamatters.org/
Jade Hellene
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 3488



« Reply #19 on: April 19, 2011, 11:57:09 pm »


The abundance of secrecy left the impression that White House officials came up with the idea for Obama’s speech at the eleventh hour in an effort to divert attention away from the debate raging in Congress. “They were scrambling to change the subject from the budget debacle and this was what they latched on to,” said the aide.

Having failed to effectively brief members of Congress on the details of his plan, few lawmakers could therefore amplify the president's message.

Administration officials, for their part, steadfastly refute the idea that they simply "winged" it.

According to one Obama aide, the president and his team decided in December that he would have to “lay out a comprehensive plan” for deficit reduction “after the FY2011 funding debate had completed.”

Another White House official described the planning as even more specific, asserting, “Its been on the schedule for the Wednesday after the [continuing resolution avoiding a government shut down] was resolved for months now.” Because a vote on the continuing resolution was delayed on several occasions, the date of the speech remained, consistently, in flux.

According to these individuals, the President’s staff had been considering university locations near or in Washington, D.C. for venue well before the speech was announced, with an eye toward delivering subsequent deficit-focused addresses outside the nation's capital the following week.

Michelle Sherrard, a spokesman for George Washington University, did not have a specific date for when the administration first contacted the university. She noted only that "The White House and GW regularly communicate about the possibility of hosting upcoming events on campus."

One administration aide defended congressional outreach, adding, “Throughout this process the President’s team has been in touch with leaders on the Hill, including both the Gang of Six [Senators meeting on their own deficit proposal] and Congressman [Paul] Ryan, and other stakeholders like the deficit commission chairs.”

“In touch,” however, remains an inherently subjective phrase. As late as the Tuesday night before the speech was delivered, one extremely close White House ally professed to not having a clue about what would be said. “I don't think they have briefed anyone and I am not sure the speech is done!”

In fact, the speech wasn’t done. According to an administration aide, “the president worked until late in the night Tuesday, and put final touches on the speech on Wednesday morning.”

Why did it take so long to finalize the details on a speech planned months in advance?

For one, various areas of policy disagreement within the White House remained unresolved. In particular, officials familiar with the discussions say, Obama's economic advisers warned against calling for a final balance of three dollars in spending reductions for every dollar generated in additional tax revenue, arguing the ratio was too explicit.

Medicare reform sparked another element of disagreement. In his speech, the president proposed strengthening the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a group tasked with finding excessive and unnecessary spending within the system. Several aides wanted him to further outline specific ways to empower Medicare to negotiate over drug prices and medical procedures.

In the end, Obama kept the speech broad, leaving Democrats officials on the Hill largely pleased.

Several members of Congress also expressed agitation with the timing.

Obama’s speech came after Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) unveiled his own budget plan, giving his own remarks the veneer of a presidential response rather than executive leadership.

Moreover, by calling for additional talks on deficit reform, the president miffed lawmakers either working on or invested in the Gang of Six talks currently ongoing.

“The fact that the president has come out with his vision should be a positive reinforcement, another indication that this is important work that needs to be done,” Press Secretary Jay Carney said on Monday in response to complaints Obama stepped into Gang of Six territory. “And the fact that the President built his vision by borrowing in many ways from the recommendations of the bipartisan commission on which a number of members of that Senate group sat… gives a good sign, a good indication, of the fact that there is a building consensus around the way to approach this problem. So he thinks it’s very complementary to the process.”

But many Democrats don't want "complementary." The Gang of Six already gives progressives angina, with the Democratic members of the group -- including Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) -- openly supporting elements of Social Security reform and even extending the Bush tax cuts. Should the president end up complementing or even embracing their approach, the worry goes, no progressive counterpoint to Ryan's proposal will emerge. Instead, the distance between the Gang of Six and the Republican alternative will become the “compromise.”

The White House has been noticeably tight-lipped about its thoughts on Gang of Six conversations, perhaps because scarce information exists as to what, exactly, the lawmakers are discussing. But signs of mounting concern permeate both on and off the Hill.

When Vice President Joe Biden hosts a deficit reduction meeting with members of Congress at the Blair House on May 5, no Democratic lawmakers from the Gang of Six will be present. Instead, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is sending Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Appropriations Committee Chairman Dan Inouye (D-Hawaii). Gang of Six member and Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), one Democratic Senate aide relayed, was more than “irked” by his absence from the talks.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2011, 12:01:17 am by Jade Hellene » Report Spam   Logged

Sort through the media disinformation:
http://mediamatters.org/
Jade Hellene
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 3488



« Reply #20 on: April 19, 2011, 11:58:20 pm »

Other Democrats voiced relief over the Gang of Six absence, speculating that both Reid and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) were growing wary about the bipartisan group's role.

Gang of Six criticism is more intense off the Hill, with several of the nation’s most powerful union groups laying down crisp lines in the sand over elements they consider non-negotiable, such as ending tax cuts for the richest Americans.

“Any plan to reduce the deficit that does not include ending the Bush tax cuts -- a clear contributor to the deficit -- is not a serious plan,” said Michelle Nawar, Director for Legislation at the Service Employees. “Every middle class family should be offended if Congress calls on them to bear the burden for reducing a deficit they did not cause while continuing to handout more tax giveaways to millionaires and corporations. We'll see what the Gang of Six proposes, but how could any Democrat support a plan that cuts needed services for seniors and children while continuing these expensive tax giveaways?”

Nawar's question presumably extends to Obama, who has punted once on letting the Bush tax rates for the wealthy expire (they will now lapse at the end of 2012).

A far more immediate and pressing concern, however, is whether the administration’s attempt to jump ahead of the deficit debate will yield the type of political fruits the White House envisions. The president’s advisers -- chiefly, former Senior Communications Aide David Axelrod –- have long seen benefits to deficit hawk-ery in private polling.

But the payoff this time around has been limited: An ABC News/Washington Post poll released on Tuesday showed that 57 percent of Americans disapproved of the way Obama is handling the economy.

“I think they were concerned about how to give the president credibility on this issue and how to win over some independents,” one top party strategist said of Obama’s speech on Wednesday. “The irony is it won’t give him any. He could have offered $10 billion more in cuts for the CR and it would never be good enough for the GOP.”

Jen Bendery contributed to this report.
Report Spam   Logged

Sort through the media disinformation:
http://mediamatters.org/
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2011, 04:15:14 pm »

Both parties want fiscal failure and martial law.

These partisn fights are just in-fighting between Lt.-Globalists.
Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2011, 04:38:38 pm »

Quote
Let's not forget how he wanted a civilian force just as well funded and just as strong as the military.  Funny how when the Hitlerian comparisons came out all over the internet and talk radio Obama backed off and the Obama Youth never happened.

There was never any armed civilian force planned, that was another right wing lie. And you conspiracy theorists fell for it!

Obama civillian national security force.




So you seriously think that black America's problems started under Obama?  
Most have to do with discrimination and NO MONEY being invested in their communities.  What have you done for black America if you are so concerned?

Sure they have money invested in their communities.  Drugs and guns money.  You forget the eugenicists in government are trying to wipe them out.

As for me I've been voting 3rd party in the state of New York since 1994 long before I even heard of the Constitution Party.  NY taxes everything out of existence there making it hard for all people.  Welfare is a big problem for all races and genders in the state of NY cuz of bad fiscal policies.  If anything a taxation induced recession oppresses equally.  I have actually met black people who work 2 jobs who complain about hill-billy white trash being a leech on society.

So if anything getting to root of bad economic policy and fixing it will benefit everyone.  That and weeding eugenicists out of government.

Quote
Also his whole Council of 10 Governors to fit the FEMA's 10 Regions of America post 50 states plan as well.  Only a dicatator would want Governors to act as their regional Lieutenants.  Good thing the NAU plans got leaked and that never came to pass.

Obama would allow the right NWO false-flag operation to create enough of a crisis to allow him to become a dictator under the Constinuity of Government plan set in place under the NWO.  The NWO wanted to use it under Bush but the 9/11 Truther backlash kept that from happening.  

Bush was the one to sign Executive Directive 50 making himself a dictator in times of crisis.  Obama must not be much of a threat as a dictator if you conspiracy guys can stop all these plans that no one has ever heard of before he even announces anything about them.

Obama & Bush work for the same people, you really think a Democrat-Dictatorship would be any better than a Republican-Dictatorship ?

You want to fight against would be dictators?  Get a clue. Go to Wisconsin, or Ohio or Michigan where those guys are all signing REAL legislation to make themselves dictators of their states.  Don't go ****ing about imaginary policies just cause you don't like the color of his skin.

The Globalists already have the national government under their control and are branching out.  They just put Obama in so you have a GQ face to charm the politically gullible.  Mid-western people are kind of folksy so the Globalists think they can expand their power grab there.  Where is Obama as far as making a public speech for unions and workers' rights ?  It's all part of the plan and it's going to get worse.

The only people still mentioning race is you liberals.  If anything you liberals are engaging in more discrimination by supporting him.  Both Alan Keyes and Cynthia McKinney are US citizens and actually eligible to run for President.  Obama is a foreigner and isn't.  Congratulations you chose a foreigner over Americans.  Who is the discriminator now ?

 
Report Spam   Logged
Krista Davenport
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5018



« Reply #23 on: May 03, 2011, 10:10:24 pm »

Quote
Obama & Bush work for the same people,

If they are both working for the same people, why did Karl Rove's people spend hundreds of billions of dollars to defeat Dems last election?  Why does FOX News spend so much time trashing him?

Cause he has different priorities than Bush.  Obama started out as middle class, while Bush is just for the rich.

Quote
The only people still mentioning race is you liberals.

Wrong.  The whole Kenyan birther bull **** is all about race, and you birthers use race code words, signs and insults all the time to attack him. 
Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #24 on: May 04, 2011, 08:32:36 am »

Of course both parties are going to spend billions.  The FED owns both parties and the Globalists own the FED.

Bush and Obama are actors.  They've been groomed for their positions at the Skull & Bones society.
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy