Atlantis Online
October 23, 2019, 05:52:51 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Ancient Crash, Epic Wave
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/14/healthscience/web.1114meteor.php?page=1

 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Democrats Propose New Whites-Only Primary

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Democrats Propose New Whites-Only Primary  (Read 23 times)
Vanguard of Truth
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 4202



« on: May 05, 2008, 11:56:53 am »


 
RJ Eskow
Democrats Propose New Whites-Only Primary
Posted May 5, 2008 | 11:49 AM (EST)
________________________________________

A senior Democratic Party official confirmed that a proposal is being circulated that would allow only white voters to participate in the remaining primaries. Under this proposal the Party would only count the votes of white people whose income level is considered to be "working class," and whose political orientation is considered conservative - or, as the official put it, "culturally non-elite."
"The other people can vote," he said on conditions of anonymity. "We're just not going to count their votes."
"We don't want those latté-sipping liberals choosing our nominee," he added. "You know who I mean: They're the ones who knew the war in Iraq was wrong and who don't like it when our Presidential candidates - or their husbands - triangulate on torture."
Yet you're pushing to have the votes counted from Michigan and Florida, which you guys agreed wouldn't be counted and where Obama didn't campaign –
"Right! That's another reason we're discounting all these other votes. Gotta make room for the ones we're squeezing in through the back door."
How will this new plan exclude these "liberals," as you call them?
"First, no college towns," the official said. "We're not counting their votes. And no college graduates either."
Why's that?
"They're not the votes we want, so we don't need to know who they prefer as a candidate. Same thing with African Americans, so we don't need to give them a voice in picking the nominee."
That doesn't sound right. Won't there be a big public backlash to a whites-only primary?
"Heh ... you'd think so, wouldn't you? But we've been using this logic for months now in making our pitch to superdelegates, and nobody's really squawked. I give the media a lot of credit for keeping ithe whole matter quiet."
What about white voters in states like Iowa?
"They don't get counted, either. Only white voters in big states, or little states that we don't have a chance in hell of winning. Those are the kinds of voters we need to win over, so we'll be counting only their votes going forward."
Um, I don't quite follow the logic. But what about caucus states?
"Nah. Any state irresponsible enough to hold a caucus instead of a primary deserves to be disenfranchised. I mean, even the word sounds elitist. 'Caucus.' They don't say 'caucus' down at the bowling alley, son."
But the caucus participants were hard-core Democratic activists - (at this the party leader tugged at his pants.)
"Caucus this, junior! Catch my drift?"
I hate to sound idealistic here, since I know how you guys hate that, but in picking a candidate ... shouldn't everybody's vote matter?
"Look, fella, do you want to win or not? If we're going to win, we need to get those white working-class voters - the ones that have consistently voted Republican for the last few elections. And to do that we have to bring out the Karl Rove playbook."
What do you mean, exactly?
"Oh, you know. Make senseless economic proposals like the gas tax holiday, because we figure - just like the Republicans - that the rubes are too stupid to know the difference. Then, when the experts disagree with us, call 'em 'elitist.' Disparage the experts, just like Bush. We can see when something works."
But what about your fellow Democrats? What if they don't want to join in a counterproductive policy like the gas tax holiday?
"Then we put 'em on the spot, just like the Republicans do. That's the answer! Make them 'stand up and be counted' - Karl came up with a great phrase there. I'm sure he won't mind if we borrow it. Then if they won't pander, we cut 'em down like timber. The only voters we need to win are lower-income whites, and if we have to damage other Democrats to get 'em we will."
But what about African American voters? Won't this new strategy of yours alienate them?
"Sure, but where are they gonna go? It doesn't matter how black people vote in the primary! Forget South Carolina! It's not like they'll vote Republican, right?"
And what about those liberals you've been taking for granted?
"They're so hardwired for the lesser of two evils that they'll pick it every time."
But if you've alienated liberals and African Americans, you've depressed the entire base of the Democratic Party. The GOP's always said you need to energize your base to ensure high voter turnout and effective fundraising.
"Aw, hell, son! We don't have to do everything those Republicans do, do we?"
And one other thing: The real voters you're courting aren't just lower-income white people, they're lower-income white men. So if you really want to use your logic, shouldn't you only count the votes of white men?
"No way, boy! That would violate one of our core Democratic Party values!"
Which value would that be?
"Inclusivity."
______________
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/democrats-propose-new-whi_b_100160.html
Report Spam   Logged



Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy