Atlantis Online
March 28, 2024, 09:58:39 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Comet theory collides with Clovis research, may explain disappearance of ancient people
http://uscnews.sc.edu/ARCH190.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Baphomet: The Bearded Head Of The Templars

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Baphomet: The Bearded Head Of The Templars  (Read 225 times)
0 Members and 55 Guests are viewing this topic.
Knight of Jerusalem
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2432



« on: March 16, 2008, 11:42:08 pm »

Baphomet: The Bearded Head Of The Templars
During the trials of the Knights Templar, many accusations were leveled that the order worshipped a head of some sort. The question remains as to what this head was and what was its significance if any to the order?

As with any mystery the answers are few while the speculations are many. Below are several theories that have been presented over the years regarding the head of the Templars. This head has often been referred to as Baphomet. In his book, "Supremely Abominable Crimes," author Edman Burman presents the following information:

"A head with one face or two faces, sometimes bearded and sometimes not, made of silver or of wood, a picture of a man or of a woman, an embalmed head that glowed in the dark or a demon."

The Baphomet
Although mentioned but a few times in the Templar trials, the concept of Baphomet has become attached at the hip to the Templar mythos. While much has been written regarding this mythos on other parts of the web site. A brief examination of the theory is relevant to the allegations of Head worship by the Templars.

King Philip IV, who lusted for the Templar wealth, could only take it from them if they were heretics. The charges of demon worship, kissing genitals and such were common accusations of heresy that lasted from the destruction of the Cathars at Albi through to the Salem witch-hunts of the American Colonies.

It is quite probable that Baphomet was either a corruption of the Islamic prophet Mohammed which would synch a conviction of Heresy by the trial or a Hebrew code for the Goddess Sophia "Wisdom." In either case little hard evidence survives to prove or disprove either claim.

The trials say little of the actual head, but there are some textual accounts of it. Guillame de Arbley who was the preceptor of the Templar house at Soissy in the diocese of Meaux testified on October 22nd, 1307 that he had seen the Bearded head twice, which he claimed was gilded and made of silver and wood. Three years later on November 10th, 1310 he claimed that the gilded head placed on Templar altars was a representation of the 11,000 virgins. There is an old tale of a group of Cornish noblewomen who were attacked and killed by a group of Huns on route to Rome. Still this account does not support the Baphomet theory and therefore casts doubts on a Baphomet, if indeed such an idol existed being the head allegedly venerated by the Templars.

In some instances the Baphomet is also described as having two heads and four legs. This could be a description of the image made by the open Shroud of Turin, which we look at below.

http://www.angelfire.com/realm/shades/demons/biblic/baphomet2.htm
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Knight of Jerusalem
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2432



« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2008, 11:42:53 pm »

The Shroud
The Templars are said to have possessed the Shroud of Turin . The shroud which when open measures approximately 12 feet by 4 1/2 feet, was commonly folded four times revealing an image of a head, that image believed to be the head of Christ. In 1204, the Templars were involved with the sack of Constantinople and it is here that they are said to have obtained the relic. Carbon dating shows that the Shroud is from around 1280. However many recent studies have shown that Carbon Dating is not as reliable as once thought

If the Shroud is the true shroud of Christ then this claim that the shroud is the object of Templar idolization could be a valid theory, however a contradictory theory is that the Shroud is actually the image of Jacques de Molay. If this is the case as many are beginning to believe, then the Templars certainly did not worship the shroud, since it came to exist after the silencing of the order in its medieval form.

Jacques De Molay
It would seem immediately that any discussion of the worshipped head of the Templars being the head of Jacques de Molay could be immediately discredited as De Molay was the last Grand Master of the order having been burned at the stake in 1314, seven years after the orders arrest. It is also rumored that the head was that of Hugues de Payens, the first Grand Master of the order.

John the Baptist
Saint John the Baptist, who was beheaded, is said also to be the source of Templar idolatry. As ludicrous as this may at first seem, it is commonly known that several bogus John the Baptist heads were around during this time. Could the Templars have possessed one of these heads?

It is possible, as the Templars were said to possess many of the religious relics of the time. As supposed Poor Knights of Christ it is quite possible that the head of St. John the Baptist would be an object of devotion and guidance since his feast was to be celebrated by the command of the Templar Rule of Order.

The Head of Jesus Christ
In his book, "The Head of God," Dr. Keith Laidler put forth the theory that the Templars were practitioners of a cult of the head, which dated back to ancient times. Laidler's theory claims that Jesus Christ's head was severed after His crucifixion and latterly fell into the hands of the Templars who venerated it as part of their cult. This head, Laidler claims is buried in the apprentice Pillar at Rosslyn Chapel in Scotland.

from: Templar History: http://www.templarhistory.com/head.html
Report Spam   Logged
Knight of Jerusalem
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2432



« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2008, 11:44:23 pm »


A History and Mythos of the Knights Templar
The Knights Templar
The Knights Templar were without a doubt the single most influential and powerful of the religious military orders that sprang up as a result of the crusades. Although younger than their rivals "The Order of the Hospital," as a monastic institution, the Templars were the first to add a military face to monasticism.

- Pic -

In the 200 years of their existence and in the centuries that have elapsed since, much speculation and conjecture has been presented regarding this noble order of white mantled knights.

Who Were The Knights Templar?
The Knights Templar were a monastic military order formed at the end of the First Crusade with the mandate of protecting Christian pilgrims on route to the Holy Land. Never before had a group of secular knights banded together and took monastic vows. In this sense they were the first of the Warrior Monks.

From humble beginnings of poverty when the order relied on alms from the traveling pilgrims, the order would go on to have the backing of the Holy See and the collective European monarchies.

Within two centuries they had become powerful enough to defy all but the Papal throne. Feared as warriors, respected for their charity and sought out for their wealth, there is no doubt that the Templar knights were the key players of the monastic fighting orders. Due to their vast wealth and surplus of materials the Templars essentially invented banking, as we know it. The church forbade the lending of money for interest, which they called usury. The Templars, being the clever sort they were, changed the manner in which loans were paid and were able to skirt the issue and finance even kings.

Perhaps because of this wealth or fear of their seemingly limitless powers, they were destined to be destroyed. The order met with a rather untimely demise at the hands of the Pope and the King of France in 1307 and by 1314, "The Poor Fellow Soldiers of Christ and the Temple of Solomon" ceased to exist.

Although originally a small group of nine knights, they quickly gained fame largely due to the backing of Bernard of Clairvaux and his "In Praise of the New Knighthood". Bernard at that time was often called the Second Pope and was the chief spokesman of Christendom. He is also the one responsible for helping to draw up the order's rules of conduct.

In European political circles, they became very powerful and influential. This was because they were immune from any authority save that of the Papal Throne. (Pope Innocent II exempted the Templars from all authority except the Pope.)

After the crusades were over, the knights returned to their Chapters throughout Europe and became known as moneylenders to the monarchs. In the process many historians believe they invented the Banking System. The Templars fought along side King Richard I (Richard The Lion Hearted) and other Crusaders in the battles for the Holy Lands.

The secret meetings and rituals of the knights would eventually cause their downfall. The King of France, Philip the Fair used these rituals and meetings to his advantage to destroy the knights. The real reason for his crushing the Templars was that he felt threatened by their power and immunity. In 1307, Philip, who desperately needed funds, to support his war against England's Edward I made his move against the Knights Templar.

On October 13th, 1307, King Philip had all the Templars arrested on the grounds of heresy, since this was the only charge that would allow the seizing of their money and assets. The Templars were tortured and as a result, ridiculous confessions were given. These confessions included:

Trampling and spitting on the cross
Homosexuality and Sodomy
Worshipping of the 'Baphomet'.
Philip was successful in ridding the Templars of their power and wealth and urged all fellow Christian leaders to do the same thing. On March 19th, 1314 the last Grand Master of the Knights Templar, Jacques de Molay was burned at the stake. De Molay is said to have cursed King Philip and Pope Clement as he burned asking both men to join him within a year. Whether he actually uttered the curse or if it is simply an apocryphal tale what remains as fact is that Clement died only one month later and Philip IV seven months after that.

from: Templar History: http://www.templarhistory.com/history.html

Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy