Worst theories & books on Atlantis

Atlantis Online > Forum > Atlantis > the Scientific Atlantis > Worst theories & books on Atlantis > Message #70526

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 Go Down

« previous next »

	Author	Topic: Worst theories & books on Atlantis (Read 5776 times)
0 Members and 104 Guests are viewing this topic.

Helios

Superhero Member

Posts: 1819

Re: Worst theories & books on Atlantis

« Reply #90 on: March 13, 2008, 10:30:30 pm »

atalante
Member
Member # 1452

Member Rated:
posted 07-04-2004 07:13 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Helios and/or Erick,
I want to interrupt your debate, to ask about an issue that was raised, but not settled in your recent posts.

Helios, using the Jowett translation, seems to say that Ancient Athens is clearly described. (We covered this in the 900 vs 9000 topic recently.)

Erick, using the Bury translation, seems to say that the geography of Ancient Athens is not decribed by Plato.

Is it true that the Jowett and Bury tranlations DISAGREE about whether Plato described the geographical borders of Ancient Athens?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 2461 | From: Tucson AZ USA | Registered: Apr 2003


	Report Spam Logged

"This power came forth out of the Atlantic Ocean, for in those days the Atlantic was navigable; and there was an island situated in front of the straits called the Pillars of Heracles; the island was larger than Libya and Asia put together..."

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 Go Up

« previous next »

Jump to: