Atlantis Online
October 20, 2019, 09:30:52 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: USA showered by a watery comet ~11,000 years ago, ending the Golden Age of man in America
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20050926/mammoth_02.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

An Inconvenient Truth (Original)

Pages: 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: An Inconvenient Truth (Original)  (Read 3636 times)
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1170 on: August 07, 2009, 01:21:46 pm »

Brig

Administrator
Member # 802

  posted 12-28-2006 05:48 PM                   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byron is showing Al, The sky is falling, Gore as a slobbering idiot? I can't stop laughing long enough to believe it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 12053 | From: Old Washington, Ohio , USA | Registered: Apr 2002   
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1171 on: August 07, 2009, 01:24:26 pm »

Byron
unregistered


  posted 12-28-2006 09:08 PM             
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually, Brig, Bush has been known to do some slobbering himself, but has been a little less discriminating about who he does it with. What do all these people have in common?



Well, none of them are Laura!  Is Bush sure he never met Jack Abramoff?



 No wonder Lieberman is the only Democrat to still support the war in Iraq:

http://mindprod.com/images/bushkisseslieberman.jpg

 So Bush isn't having an affair with Condaleeza Rice?


Sure, they aren't!
 Maybe the Bushes are just a little too close to the Saudi Royal Family?
http://photos6.flickr.com/11114104_cd92e1df42.jpg

[ 12-28-2006, 09:09 PM: Message edited by: Byron ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IP: Logged |   
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1172 on: August 07, 2009, 01:24:45 pm »

Byron
unregistered


  posted 12-28-2006 09:13 PM             
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And, back to Al and Ishtar:
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IP: Logged |   
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1173 on: August 07, 2009, 01:25:03 pm »

Ishtar was here 777

Member
Member # 736

  posted 12-29-2006 09:40 AM                   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byron that is Well,Tipper, ya silly goose.

Ya know that one with Condi always made me wonder, She looks, well, way to ecstatic in that picture, she seems to be injoyng it way to much...

hee hee

--------------------
The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 12635 | Registered: Feb 2002   
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1174 on: August 07, 2009, 01:25:24 pm »

BigFatFurryTexan

Member
Member # 1520

Rate Member   posted 12-29-2006 10:41 AM                   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lieberman looked like he was trying to move his mouth to the other side of his face.

Ish, if you WERE tipper, i may have to completely ignore you. Don't like her too much...too bad Gore is married to her. He seems like a nice, yet looney, guy.

--------------------
Think outside the flock

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 3738 | From: West Texas | Registered: May 2003   
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1175 on: August 07, 2009, 01:25:33 pm »

Ishtar was here 777

Member
Member # 736

  posted 12-29-2006 10:52 AM                   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
completely ?

lol

--------------------
The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 12635 | Registered: Feb 2002   
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1176 on: August 07, 2009, 01:26:15 pm »

Ishtar was here 777

Member
Member # 736

  posted 12-29-2006 12:30 PM                   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review of the year: Global warming
Our worst fears are exceeded by reality
By Steve Connor
Published: 29 December 2006
It has been a hot year. The average temperature in Britain for 2006 was higher than at any time since records began in 1659. Globally, it looks set to be the sixth hottest year on record. The signs during the past 12 months have been all around us. Little winter snow in the Alpine ski resorts, continuing droughts in Africa, mountain glaciers melting faster than at any time in the past 5,000 years, disappearing Arctic sea ice, Greenland's ice sheet sliding into the sea. Oh, and a hosepipe ban in southern England.

You could be forgiven for thinking that you've heard it all before. You may think it's time to turn the page and read something else. But you'd be wrong. 2006 will be remembered by climatologists as the year in which the potential scale of global warming came into focus. And the problem can be summarised in one word: feedback.

During the past year, scientific findings emerged that made even the most doom-laden predictions about climate change seem a little on the optimistic side. And at the heart of the issue is the idea of climate feedbacks - when the effects of global warming begin to feed into the causes of global warming. Feedbacks can either make things better, or they can make things worse. The trouble is, everywhere scientists looked in 2006, they encountered feedbacks that will make things worse - a lot worse.

Next year, the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will publish its fourth assessment on the scale of the future problems facing humanity. Its last assessment, published in 2001, had little to say on the subject of climate feedbacks, partly because, at that time, they were such an unknown quantity. This year, scientists came to learn a little more about them, and they didn't like what they learnt.
 
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1177 on: August 07, 2009, 01:26:36 pm »

During the past two decades, the IPCC has tended to regard the Earth's climate as something that will change gradually and smoothly, as carbon dioxide and global temperatures continue their lock-step rise. But there is a growing consensus among many climate scientists that this may be giving a false sense of security. They fear that feedback reactions may begin to kick in and suddenly tip the climate beyond a critical threshold from which it cannot easily recover.

Climate feedbacks could turn the Earth into a very different planet over a dramatically short period of time. It has happened in the past, scientists say, and it could easily happen in the future given the unprecedented scale of the environmental changes caused by man.

There are two types of feedback that can play a role in the future direction of the Earth's climate. The first is a "negative" feedback, which is largely good for us, because it works against things getting worse. The classic example of a negative feedback is the fertilising effect of carbon dioxide. As concentrations rise, then so does the amount of carbon absorbed by the higher growth rate of plants. The result is a negative feedback that tends to check rising levels of carbon dioxide.

A "positive" feedback makes things worse by adding to the existing problem. It brings about a vicious circle, in which a rise in carbon dioxide or global temperatures causes some change in the climate system which, in turn, leads to further rises in carbon dioxide or temperatures.
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1178 on: August 07, 2009, 01:26:46 pm »

A classic example of a positive feedback is the melting sea ice of the Arctic. As temperatures rise, the ice floating on the Arctic sea melts, exposing dark ocean where once there was white ice that reflected sunlight, and heat, back into space. The newly revealed dark ocean absorbs more sunlight and heats up, causing more ice to melt, and so reinforcing the positive-feedback cycle.

But even this simple description belies the true complexity of life on Earth. In fact, there is a negative feedback at work as well with Arctic sea ice, which insulates the underlying ocean and keeps it warmer during the cold, dark northern winters. However, on balance, it is the positive feedback that dominates here, as it does in several other instances investigated by scientists in 2006.

"The main concern is that the more we look, the more positive feedbacks we find," says Olivier Boucher, a climate scientist at the Met Office. "That's not the case when it comes to negative feedbacks. There seems to be far fewer of them." The sentiment is echoed by Chris Rapley, the director of the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge: "When we look at the list of all the feedbacks in the climate, the list of positive feedbacks is worryingly long - a lot longer than the negative feedbacks. To be honest, it's a wonder that the climate has remained so stable."

Let's stick with Arctic sea ice a bit longer before looking at other issues that emerged 2006. In March, Nasa satellites monitored a 28-year record low for winter sea ice. Normally sea ice recovers during the long Arctic winter, but this was the second consecutive year that the ice failed to re-form fully to is previous winter extent.
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1179 on: August 07, 2009, 01:27:00 pm »

This meant there was less ice at the start of the northern summer, with the result that last September saw the second monthly minimum for summer sea ice - almost hitting the record minimum set in September 2005.

During the past four or five years, there has been an acceleration in the rate at which sea ice is melting, a change that some scientists put down to a positive feedback. "Our hypothesis is that we've reached the tipping point," says Ron Lindsay of the University of Washington in Seattle. "For sea ice, the positive feedback is that increased summer melt means decreased winter growth and then even more melting the next summer, and so on."

Professor Lindsay likens the positive feedback in the Arctic to a ball that has begun to roll down a slope, gathering momentum and speed as it goes. In order to reverse the direction of movement, the ball has to be pushed back up the slope. But how? "Perhaps a cooling period could reverse the situation," he says. "But with global warming, temperatures are only bound to rise."
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1180 on: August 07, 2009, 01:27:12 pm »

While we are in the northern hemisphere, take a look at another positive feedback that scientists investigated in 2006. This is connected to the frozen permafrost of Siberia and northern Canada, which lock up vast stores of carbon in the form of methane, a gas formed by the decomposition of organic matter. For more than 12,000 years, this methane - a greenhouse gas 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide - has been safely stored under the permanently frozen ground. But now the permafrost is melting and the gas is bubbling free into the atmosphere.

Sergei Kirpotin, a botanist at Tomsk State University in Russia, has been studying the extent of the melting permafrost of Western Siberia, the site of the world's biggest frozen peat bog. During the past few years, he has watched lakes getting bigger and bigger as the solid permafrost underneath liquifies.

Normally, patches on white lichen on high Siberian ground reflect the sun's rays and help to keep the ground underneath cold. But as the dark lakes expand, more heat is absorbed and more permafrost melts. "As we predicted in the early 1990s, there's a critical barrier," says Professor Kirpotin. "Once global warming pushes the melting process past that line, it begins to perpetuate itself."
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1181 on: August 07, 2009, 01:27:19 pm »

The once-frozen peat bogs of Siberia - bigger than France and Germany combined - began to "boil" furiously in the summer of 2006 as methane bubbled to the surface. Exactly how much is being released into the atmosphere is unknown, although some estimates put it as high as 100,000 tons a day - which means a warming effect greater than America's man-made emissions of carbon dioxide.

But Katey Walter of the University of Alaska believes even this could be seriously underestimated. In a study published in Nature in September, Walter and her colleagues calculated that the level of methane emissions from Siberia could be anywhere between 10 per cent and 63 per cent higher than anyone had hitherto suspected. "We have shown that the North Siberian lakes are a significantly larger source of atmospheric methane than previously recognised," she says.

So the message is clear: frozen peat bogs that turn into heat-absorbing lakes release methane, which means a stronger greenhouse effect and higher temperatures, leading to more permafrost melting. The cycle was clearly documented in 2006 but just how strong this positive feedback turns out to be has yet to be fully determined.
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1182 on: August 07, 2009, 01:27:37 pm »

Another study in 2006 looked at perhaps the most important climate feedback there is. Yet it went unreported - so listen up. The Earth has been a very accommodating planet. During the past 200 years, it has absorbed more than half of all man-made emissions of carbon dioxide through natural carbon "sinks", mostly in the ocean but also on land. The rest of the emissions have been left in the air to aggravate the Earth's natural greenhouse effect, so raising global average temperatures.

But what if something were to interfere with these very useful carbon "sinks"? Can we forever rely on them to remain sinks, or could they turn into dangerous sources of atmospheric carbon? A huge international team of climatologists asked these questions in a little-known study published in the July issue of the Journal of Climate. The conclusion makes depressing reading.

The scientists investigated what would happen if they tinkered with 11 of the world's biggest computer models of the complex climate-carbon cycle. They wanted to simulate what would happen to the carbon sinks on the land and the ocean for each model as the world gets warmer. All the models agreed that as the world heated up, the ability of the land and the oceans to keep on absorbing carbon as efficiently as they have in the past 200 years gets appreciably worse.
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1183 on: August 07, 2009, 01:27:56 pm »

In other words, we cannot rely on planet Earth to be so accommodating in terms of mopping up half of our carbon pollution. But could something even worse happen? Could these carbon sinks turn into carbon sources? The answer is yes. Many models suggest that the terrestrial biosphere could become a net carbon producer by the mid 21st century. Signs are that it is already happening in some parts of the world.

Guy Kirk of the National Soil Resources Institute at Cranfield University found that the soil of Britain is releasing more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than a quarter of a century ago because increasing temperatures are speeding up the rate of organic decay. "It's a feedback loop," says Professor Kirk. "The warmer it gets, the faster it is happening." In fact, he estimates that since 1978, Britain's soil has released on average an extra 13 million tons of carbon dioxide a year, which is more than the 12.7 million tons a year Britain saved by cleaning up its industrial emissions.

The outlook does not look any better out at sea. The important carbon sinks of the ocean are also suffering from feedback. As more carbon dioxide dissolves in seawater to form carbonic acid, the acidity of the ocean increases - the rate is 100 times faster than at any time for millions of years.
Report Spam   Logged
Athena Nike
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2209



« Reply #1184 on: August 07, 2009, 01:28:00 pm »

There is a physical feedback - it is just harder for more carbon dioxide to dissolve in acid water - as well as a biological feedback. Tiny organisms called coccolithophores use dissolved carbon to make their shells, but acidic seas make this more difficult. This blocks an important biological pump that pushes carbon to a long-term store on the seabed - which is what happens when billions of tiny shells sink to the depths as coccolithophores die.

Yet another ocean feedback was monitored in 2006, this time involving phytoplankton, the tiny microscopic plants of the sea that form the basis of the entire marine food chain. Nasa satellites showed earlier this month that phytoplankton - which absorb carbon dioxide - are finding it harder to live in the more stratified layers of the warmer ocean, which restrict the mixing of vital nutrients. Since 2000, when the sea surface temperatures began to rise more noticeably, the photosynthetic productivity of phytoplankton have decreased in some ocean regions by 30 per cent.
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 [79] 80   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy