Message #14367

[Mark of Australia]

Hi Cat ,

Ahhh ,it's your specialty ,,interesting.

It seems that the scientists who are trying to prove they are concrete blocks, focus on the evidence in support ,,while those against focus on the evidence they were carved blocks.

What do you say about the discovery of silicon dioxide nanoscale spheres that are claimed to prove that the limestone is not natural??

I have learnt to be sceptical of when scientists say something is ' highly improbable' ,as Barsoum is quoted as saying about the pyramid blocks being natural limestone. When they make such claims, that's when they seem to be most wrong. It is very curious that just as he thinks its highly improbable one way ,,you think it's highly improbable the other way... I've gotten used to these sorts of situations in science... It basically means that you have to take what is asserted very lightly no matter how many certificates they have to their name.