Atlantis Online
March 28, 2024, 02:04:05 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Comet theory collides with Clovis research, may explain disappearance of ancient people
http://uscnews.sc.edu/ARCH190.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Blood Of The Gods - Some of us must have inherited it

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Blood Of The Gods - Some of us must have inherited it  (Read 1503 times)
0 Members and 94 Guests are viewing this topic.
Qoais
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3423



« on: November 27, 2007, 02:18:10 am »

Quite some time ago, I came across this article, and recently stumpled across it again.  Being that I do believe the ancient writings regarding the "gods" coming from the heavens, I find this work very provocative.  Sometimes, as the saying goes "we can't see the forest for the trees".  And sometimes, the answer is so simple, we can't figure it out.  Thirty some years have passed since this article was written and in view of the technological advances we've made in that time, I think this idea should be subjected to further research, if it hasn't been already.  (I haven't exactly looked into it personally.  Maybe that will be my next project! ) Tongue

If it's true as the Bible says (and other works) that the gods walked upon the earth, and they saw the daughters of men and took them for wives, and these wives bore them children, then surely we must have inherited from our FATHERS.  Since we all know that we do inherit from both father and mother, just what was it we inherited from our "godly" fathers?  Are WE the missing link? Would science now be able to separate the genetic traits we acquired from our alleged "ape" forbears and our "godly" ones?

BLOOD OF THE GODS

Are you an Rh Negative blood type?  If so you could be a decendent of the ancient astronauts themselves!

About a year and a half ago my sister Bonnie and I were discussing some of the unusual characteristics of our family.  Bonnie had a problem with infants haemolytic disease.  She has 0 negative blood.  She has written a book including this problem called "The Deux" by Venus Thaddeus.  One of the questions we asked was why does this haemolytic disease occur?  Why, along with the Rh negative blood does our family have such a high IQ (135-140 average).  Why so many psychic experiences?  Why this urge to ask "why"?  Why the early maturity or the large head and eyes?  Why have we always felt we were "different" from other people?  And so many other things to set us apart.

We were raised in the church, but we never received answers to the questions we asked.  Why doesn't anyone else ask these same questions?  We are not satisfied with the answer "just because".  Are there others out there who ask the same questions?  Then we heard about the possibility of the ancient astronauts and the pieces started to fall into place.

For the past decade many people have been working to prove that the earth has been visited by extraterretrial beings.  Who are these visitors?  Why did they come?  Why did they leave?  Did they leave?

If earth was visited in the ancient past, are there any decendants of these visitors?  If all mankind are not descendants of these visitors, which ones are?  who are the "Children of Isreal"?  Why was their seed blessed?  Why were they told not to intermarry with other people and to circumcise their sons for identification?  Why were they told to preserve their geneology?  Where did Adam and Eve's sons go to get their wives, if they were the only "humans" on earth?
Report Spam   Logged

An open-minded view of the past allows for an unprejudiced glimpse into the future.

Logic rules.

"Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong."

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Qoais
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3423



« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2007, 02:40:04 am »

...continued

Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates.  They have much proof to back up their theories, including modern blood analysis and comparative studies between modern man and lower anthripoids, such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus monkey.

It has been proven that the majority of mankind (85%) has a blood factor common with the rhesus monkey.  This is called rhesus positive blood.  Usually shortened to Rh positive.  This factor is completely independent from the A,B, and O blood types.

In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation.  We can have any of numerous combinations of traits inherited from all our ancestors.  Nothing more and nothing less.  therefore, if man ad ape evolved from a comon ancestor, their blood would have evolved the same way.  Blood factors are transmitted with much more exactitude than any other characteristic.  It would seem that modern man and rhesus monkey may have had a common ancestor sometime in the ancient past.  All other earthly primates also have the Rh factor, but this leaves out the people who are Rh negative.  If all mankind evolved from the same ancestor their blood would be compatible.  Where did the Rh negatives come from?  If they are not the descendants of prehistoric man, could they be the descendants of the ancient astronauts?

All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any other of their species.  Relative size and color makes no difference.  Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are the same species?  Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child.  Her blood builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it would a virus), thereby destroying the infant.  Why would a mother's body reject her own offspring?  Nowhere else in nature does this occur naturally.  This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a horse and donkey (altho the donkey cannot reproduce - Q)  This fact alone points to the distinct possibility of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species. 

I would just like to make a note here, and point out once again that Edgar Cayce, in one of his readings, told about how the first "perfect" human was born in Egypt.  I would also like to note that the Sumerian texts also talk about the genetic manipulation and how the first tries were not successful - with some horrifying results - until they actually used some of their own (the Anunnaki) DNA. Q.


No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from  Most, familiar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor.  If we are a mutation, what caused the mutation?  Why does it continue with the exact characteristics?  Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestory?  Who was this ancestor?  Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment.

The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood.  about 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry one (r) negative gene.  The average among most people is only 15-17%-Rh negative, while some groups have very little.  the Oriental Jews of Isreal, also have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people have only about 1% Rh negative.  The Samaritians and the Black Cochin Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood is rare among most black people.

Could the Basque people be one of these colonies?  Or could it have been the original colony on earth?  The origin of the Basques is unknown.  their language is unlike any other European language.  Some believe that Basque was the original language of the book of Genesis.  Some believe it was the original language of the world and possibly of the creator.
Report Spam   Logged

An open-minded view of the past allows for an unprejudiced glimpse into the future.

Logic rules.

"Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong."
Qoais
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3423



« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2007, 02:51:14 am »

...continued

Genesis 6:2 - "The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and took them wives, all of which they chose".  Who were the children of these marriages?
Genesis 6:4 - "God came into the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, and the same became mighty men of old".  From the King James Bible dictionary we find:  "menchildren- men of Isreal, male children of God, not children of man- Ex. 34:23: Ex. 34:7 states "The iniquity of the father will be unto the children unto the fourth generation".  It is plain that something is inherited, could it be the blood?

Blood is mentioned more often than any other word in the Bible, except God.  These two words you will find on almost every page, blood and God! (The blood of the Gods?)  This message has been written for thousands of years.  There is a connection between the blood and the Gods.

(oi vay!  The Da Vinci code didn't go back far enough! Q.

The American Indians had the tradition of making good friends, "blood brothers", if they thought they were worthy.  Could this tradition have been for a reason?  Could they have actually been checking to see if they were blood brothers (the same type blood)?  The clumping (aggulation) that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is visible to the naked eye.  Could they have been told, by their ancestors, that their blood was different from that of the rest of mankind except for their brothers and sisters, from other tribes, scattered throughout the earth.  Indian tradition declares that their ancestors were of cosmic origin.  The Indian totem pole is actually a family genealogy.



Report Spam   Logged

An open-minded view of the past allows for an unprejudiced glimpse into the future.

Logic rules.

"Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong."
Qoais
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3423



« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2007, 03:02:32 am »

...continued

Why all this preoccupation with genealogy among different people scattered throughout the earth?  No other animal on earth has this preoccupation with ancestory.  Where did this tradition come from?  People scattered throughout the earth, who have had no known contact with each other all simultaneously got the urge to chart their family tree.  Why?  ow important could this have been to primitive cave man, struggling to survive, to chart their genealogy?  They had no understanding of modern genetics and inheritance.  So why should they preserve their genealogy?  Were they told, by the ancient astronauts, to preserve their heritage, until a future date when they would return and it would be understood?  Until a time, like now, wen their descendent would be able to understand the message they were leaving.


Although they probably didn't realize the importance of preserving their genealogy, they were told that future generations would understand.  Are we that future generation?  Was there a message left for us to understand?  Do we have the courage to look for the answer?  do we really want to know or would we rather keep our heads buried in the sand?  What we don't know will still affect us.  You will not see unless you look.  Only through knowledge will we find truth.

I have searched in vain, for scientific proof that the Rh negative blood was a natural earthly occurrence.  Instead I have found proof that the Rh negative had not evolved on earth in the natural course of events.

For many years people have been searching for the wrong thing.  Could the true "missing link" actually be man himself?  The unknown link between earth and the stars-hybrid man.  Man may be the missing link between primate and extraterrestrial.  It seems inconceivable to me that those working on the evolution theory have overlooked this possibility.  How can they state, that these peoople are lacking a factor contained in all other earthly primates, including the naked ape, and not ask why?  What other characteristics are common among these people that are uncommon to other people?  Is there a real difference other than just a different blood?
« Last Edit: November 27, 2007, 03:04:17 am by Qoais » Report Spam   Logged

An open-minded view of the past allows for an unprejudiced glimpse into the future.

Logic rules.

"Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong."
Qoais
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3423



« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2007, 03:20:55 am »

...continued

A very good comparative study between man and the primates can be found in Max Flindt's book "Mankind, Child of the Stars", Fawcett publisher, Books 1 and 2.  He has documented many of the characteristics we ay have received from our cosmic ancestors.  It does show quite conclusively that mankind is a hybrid between our cosmic ancestor and our earth ancestor.  I have merely carried this idea to its logical conclusion.  If mankind is a hybrid descendant of the acient astronauts, surely there would be some, appearing periodically, who would be genetically very similar to them.  Would this not include their psychic powers?  Could the great sleeping prohet, Edgar Cayce, have been one of these?  Could Jesus Christ also have been one of these?  A true descendant of the ancient astronauts.  If he was a true genetic duplicate of them he would also have their powers and possibly their knowledge.  I cannot say whether he was born with this kowledge or whether he estalished psychic communications with our cosmic family, but it is plain that he had powers far beyond those of mortal man.  Could he have been an example of what the ancient astronauts were like?  Jesus stated that the Father and him were one.  Could he have actually meant that literally?  He may have been an exact duplicate of his (our) ancient Father.  He may have been a clone of the cosmonauts.  Everyone knows the story of his virgin birth and the heavenly intervention.  Could this have been implanting a clone into Mary's sterilized egg?  Could the whole egg have actually been an implant?

The Rh negative blood, which appears not to have originated on earth, may prove to be a major factor in proving mankind is a hybrid.  It is not the whole answer but it is a key for unlocking the genetic puzzle of our heritage.  Tissue factors will also prove to be quite revealing.  Scientists are now able to determine the tissue factors of 5000 year old mummies.  Could some of these mummies have been the ancient astronauts?  Why were these mummies preserved well enough for us to analyze their blood and tissue factors?  Could there be a message in the genetic factors of the mummies themselves?

And now with DNA testing, it should be a bit easier.  Q

There is an interesting fact found in the book "X-Raying the Pharoahs" by James Harris and Kent Weeks, 1973 (Scribners).  Upon x-raying the tomb of Makare, high priestess of Ammon, it was found that the infant buried with her labeled ("Prince Moutenihet) was actually a female hamadryas baboon.  An examination of Makare showed she had given birth shortly before dying.  Could she have given birth to the baboon found with her?  Why else would it have been buried with her?  A genetic throwback?

My research has shown that the majority of those with psychic powers also have Rh negative blood.  Most psychic and faith healers also have this blood.  Strangely enough, many of those doing research into the ancient astronaut theory and other phenomena also have Rh negative blood. 

Why is there such a large percentage of negative in these unusual fields?  Could we have a vague memory of what we are looking for?  It has been said that a question is not asked until the answer is known.

There are about 5000 known blood factors and all of these must contribute to the complete picture.  But the Rh negative blood is the place to start our search.

Report Spam   Logged

An open-minded view of the past allows for an unprejudiced glimpse into the future.

Logic rules.

"Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong."
Mario Dantas
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1376


WWW
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2007, 06:05:50 pm »

Hi Qoais,




The dynamic structure of hemoglobin is responsible for its ability to transport oxygen within mammalian blood.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics


Good research!

"Eureka (Greek "I have found it") is an exclamation used as an interjection to celebrate a discovery. It is most famously attributed to Archimedes; he reportedly uttered the word when, while bathing, he suddenly understood that the volume of an irregular object could be calculated by finding the volume of water displaced when the object was submerged in water. After making this discovery, he is said to have leapt out of his bathtub and run through the streets of Syracuse naked"

Eureka (word)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think most of the things mentioned to be true, although blood issues are tricky (culturally), one can't deny the "coincidental" facts you forwarded.

I have the idea that god is behind all things that happened before, and now, of course. It was the reason for Mankind to nearly disappear but also the Saviour and Creator of the things we now know (volatile opinion), but there might have occured genetic "mutations" which invalidated several people to deliver in perfect conditions, the need to procreate was paramount, therefore, we managed to continue on a Human basis, but with defects that would be washed away in future "generations" (note that this is just speculation). Critias also states the Godly and Human bloodlines unbalance, that turned them greedy and violent. But again you could be right. Nice reading.
     

The meaning of the word Israel is "Struggles with God", (i didn't know that...)

regards,

Mario

Report Spam   Logged

Tom Hebert
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1370


« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2007, 07:36:19 pm »

There were some interesting speculations in the article, but I wonder how many of them can be verified.  Are Rh negative people really more psychic?  Do they really have higher IQ's?  Do they have different physical characteristics (big heads, large eyes,etc.)?

Overall, I agree with what Mario said.  The God factor has a lot more to do with human development that the Rh factor.  That's only my opinion, though.  I would like to see more studies if there are any.
Report Spam   Logged
Qoais
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3423



« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2007, 07:40:53 pm »

I saw this article and thought - wow - what a way to get back to our roots! 

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/11/14/monkey.clones.ap/index.html
Report Spam   Logged

An open-minded view of the past allows for an unprejudiced glimpse into the future.

Logic rules.

"Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong."
Qoais
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3423



« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2007, 07:45:18 pm »

I don't know Tom, the article was written back in the '70's and we've come a long way since then.  I don't know much about what causes mutations, especially in humans, or why after there is a mutant, the genetics don't revert back to their origins.  Supposedly, whatever the ancestors were, the mutant would still have that same genetic code, but I don't know for sure.

I don't know if the person who wrote the article did a survey independantly or not, maybe it was just something her and her sister noticed when doing research for their book.  It would be kind of neat to find out if those assertions are true.
Report Spam   Logged

An open-minded view of the past allows for an unprejudiced glimpse into the future.

Logic rules.

"Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong."
rockessence
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1688


Using rocks and minerals to heal the earth and us.


WWW
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2007, 10:03:03 pm »

RE: "Upon x-raying the tomb of Makare, high priestess of Ammon, it was found that the infant buried with her labeled ("Prince Moutenihet) was actually a female hamadryas baboon.  An examination of Makare showed she had given birth shortly before dying.  Could she have given birth to the baboon found with her?  Why else would it have been buried with her?  A genetic throwback?"

What makes the most sense to me is simply a covert switch of a live baby for a dead baboon.... The possibly royal infant may have been spirited away for reasons that never came to light and a cocooned corpse produced to be buried with Makare...
Report Spam   Logged

ILLIGITIMI NON CARBORUNDUM

Thus ye may find in thy mental and spiritual self, ye can make thyself just as happy or just as miserable as ye like. How miserable do ye want to be?......For you GROW to heaven, you don't GO to heaven. It is within thine own conscience that ye grow there.

Edgar Cayce
Qoais
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3423



« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2007, 11:59:08 pm »

I was kind of thinking Rocky, that maybe it was her favorite pet Cheesy  But it could have been as you say, because it wouldn't be the first time.
Report Spam   Logged

An open-minded view of the past allows for an unprejudiced glimpse into the future.

Logic rules.

"Intellectual brilliance is no guarantee against being dead wrong."
rockessence
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1688


Using rocks and minerals to heal the earth and us.


WWW
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2007, 12:28:43 am »

Another thought: Those responsible for burials, indeed it would seem, all Egyptians, had a deep and abiding belief in the "life" in "afterlife".... so to pull off a trick like that seems really against all possibility.

Perhaps you are right and it is a pet!
Report Spam   Logged

ILLIGITIMI NON CARBORUNDUM

Thus ye may find in thy mental and spiritual self, ye can make thyself just as happy or just as miserable as ye like. How miserable do ye want to be?......For you GROW to heaven, you don't GO to heaven. It is within thine own conscience that ye grow there.

Edgar Cayce
Wanderer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 73



« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2008, 10:39:52 am »

The concept that humankind has been assisted to its present level has come and gone in and out of favor for many decades.  If one throws everything else out and only looks at the human animal's progression physically and mentally it would show how freaky we are.

No other living thing has diverged and developed from the extremes in so short a time in the history of the planet.  Most species have remained physically and mentally the same for longer than us including those many which predate early hominids.  There is no precident as to why humans have developed so radically when others have evolved at even and predictable rates.

Certainly if we open the mind to ANY possibility we can entertain the idea that humankind has been "interferred" with biologically in a positive way on multiple occassions.  Artificial interference would account for the unprecidented leaps in growth we've experienced.  Of course we have to concede that a race from off-planet has been dedicated to their "experiment" for a few million years.
It's something else to think about.

Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy