Atlantis Online
March 29, 2024, 06:10:22 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: FARMING FROM 6,000 YEARS AGO
http://www.thisislincolnshire.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=156622&command=displayContent&sourceNode=156618&contentPK=18789712&folderPk=87030
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Dark Alliance: Contras, ****, and the CIA

Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Dark Alliance: Contras, ****, and the CIA  (Read 415 times)
0 Members and 49 Guests are viewing this topic.
Firefly
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3120



« on: November 08, 2007, 12:31:15 am »

CIA series fell short, says paper

by Associated Press



SAN JOSE, Calif. - The executive editor of the San Jose Mercury News has admitted to shortcomings in the newspaper's controversial series on the crack-**** explosion in Los Angeles in the 1980s.


In an open letter to readers in the newspaper's editorial section yesterday, Jerry Ceppos said the newspaper solidly documented that a drug ring associated with the contra rebels in Nicaragua sold large quantities of **** in inner-city Los Angeles, and that some of the profits from those sales went to the contras.


However, he said, the three-part "Dark Alliance" series, published last summer, occasionally omitted important information and created impressions open to misinterpretation.


"I believe that we fell short at every step of our process - in the writing, editing and production of our work. Several people here share that burden," he wrote.


"We have learned from the experience and even are changing the way we handle major investigations."


The series, written by reporter Gary Webb, reported that a San Francisco Bay Area drug ring sold **** in South Central Los Angeles, then funneled profits to the contras for the better part of a decade.


The series traced the drugs to dealers Danilo Blandon and Ricky Ross, leaders of a CIA-run guerrilla army in Nicaragua.


The Seattle Times ran the series on Aug. 22-23, 1996.


The reports sparked widespread anger in the black community toward the CIA, as well as numerous federal investigations into whether the CIA took part in or countenanced the selling of crack **** to raise money for contras.


The investigations never found that the CIA had any link to drug dealing. Several newspapers also disputed the Mercury News report.


Ceppos wrote that while the newspaper did not report the CIA knew about the drug operations, it implied CIA knowledge.


"Although members of the drug ring met with contra leaders paid by the CIA and Webb believes the relationship with the CIA was a tight one, I feel that we did not have proof that top CIA officials knew of the relationship," he wrote. "I believe that part of our contract with readers is to be as clear about what we don't know as what we do know.


"We also did not include CIA comment about our findings, and I think we should have."


Ceppos also said the series omitted conflicting information that Blandon testified he stopped sending **** profits to the contras at the end of 1982, after being in operation for a year. That information, Ceppos said, "contradicted a central assertion of the series" and should have been included.


The editor also said the series reported the profit figures from the drug sales as fact when they were estimates, and unfairly suggested the drugs funneled to Los Angeles played a critical role in the crack problem in urban America.


"Because the national crack epidemic was a complex phenomenon that had more than one origin, our discussion of this issue needed to be clearer," Ceppos said.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, May 14, 1997

Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy