Atlantis Online
December 03, 2020, 01:59:04 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Ancient Crash, Epic Wave

  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Cheney Escapes Assasination in Afghanistan

Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Cheney Escapes Assasination in Afghanistan  (Read 69 times)
Superhero Member
Posts: 4550

« on: February 27, 2007, 03:12:18 pm »

A Taliban Message to Cheney
Tuesday, Feb. 27, 2007 By ARYN BAKER/KABUL

Afghans carry a man who was knocked unconscious by a suicide attack during a visit by Vice President Dick Cheney to Bagram air base some 60 Kms north of Kabul, Feb. 27, 2007. The man's brother was among at least 14 people killed in the attack.
Shah Marai / AFP / Getty
Article Tools
A suicide bomber detonated himself outside the main U.S. military base in Afghanistan this morning, less than 24 hours after U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney arrived to discuss mounting Taliban activity with Afghan President Hamid Karzai. While Cheney himself was far from danger, the well-timed attack underscores the urgency of the Vice President's mission in the region. Cheney had just arrived in Afghanistan following a highly secretive four-hour stopover in Pakistan, where he delivered a muscular private message to President Pervez Musharraf, in which he urged him to crack down more aggressively against Taliban and growing al-Qaeda activities.
The carnage at Bagram Air Force Base is still being assessed. One report had two Americans and a South Korean killed, with eyewitnesses saying anywhere from four to eight foreigners and at least a score of Afghans were among the dead or wounded. The bomber did not get too far into the Bagram facility: the explosion occurred at the first gate. He would have had to get past at least three other checkpoints before actually being on the base. It is, nevertheless, the latest in a string of violent attacks throughout the country that may herald the start of an anticipated Taliban spring offensive. The Taliban have claimed responsibility, and say they had advance knowledge of Cheney's visit. It is more likely that they sent the bomber out only after it was announced last night that Cheney's talk with Karzai had been delayed due to a snowstorm and they suddenly had an opportunity to make a dramatic statement.
Afghan officials have long accused Pakistan of supporting the Taliban insurgency as a way to gain strategic leverage in the region, a claim Islamabad contests. But over the past several months mounting evidence gathered by U.S., NATO and Afghan intelligence agencies indicates that the resurgent Taliban has treated the Pakistan-Afghanistan border as a revolving door: attacking coalition troops in Afghanistan, then retreating to the ungoverned western frontier of Pakistan to regroup and re-equip.
Islamabad denies that the Taliban is using Pakistan as a sanctuary, and Musharraf vowed last fall to strengthen the border and to crack down on training camps. While Pakistan has closed down some camps, many observers in both Pakistan and Afghanistan say he is not doing enough to stop Taliban and al-Qaeda activity in the region, a sentiment that seems to be shared by the Bush Administration, judging by the recent stream of official visitors to the Pakistani capital.
Americans are particularly concerned about a peace deal Musharraf struck last September with tribal leaders in Waziristan, a mountainous region bordering Afghanistan, in which he offered them greater sovereignty in exchange for promising to kick out foreign militants. Musharraf called the agreement a success and promised President George Bush at the time that "there won't be a Taliban and there won't be an al-Qaeda." However, cross-border attacks have increased threefold since September, according to Coalition forces on the Afghan side, and two weeks ago Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice described the situation as a "disappointment."
Cheney's visit is the latest sign of the Administration's growing impatience with Pakistan's inability or reluctance to crack down on Islamic militants. Cheney's talk with Musharraf, while not characterized by the White House as a "tough message," follows a similar visit last month by U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. Since then murmurs in the U.S. intelligence community reveal mounting concerns that al-Qaeda is reestablishing itself in Waziristan. Stephen Kappes, Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, accompanied Cheney on this particular leg of his tour, which may indicate that much of the private conversation revolved around evidence of further al-Qaeda activity in the region.
If that is the case, both Pakistan and Afghanistan may be in for a substantial increase in violence over the next few months. Tasneem Aslam, Pakistan's foreign Ministry spokesperson, says that Musharraf is already doing everything he can to police the region, pointing out that 80,000 troops line the border, some 800 of whom have died in skirmishes with militants from both sides. Pakistan is also fencing heavily trafficked areas, and has installed a biometric identification system at the main western border crossing of Chaman. "We are doing our utmost to stop the cross-border activity," she says. "But we expect matching steps from the other side as well. What are the Afghans doing to combat this problem? Or the U.S.?"
This has become a common refrain in Pakistan, where officials feel they are being unfairly blamed for Afghanistan's failures, and resentment often colors government statements on Pakistani, U.S. and Afghan relations. Following Cheney's visit, Pakistan's Foreign Ministry angrily retorted in a press statement: "Pakistan does not accept dictation from any side or any source." That may play well in the Punjab, but Pakistan might want to start learning how to take notes. Democrats in the U.S. are promoting legislation in Congress that would withhold military aid to Pakistan unless President George Bush can certify that the Pakistani government is doing everything it can to halt Taliban and al-Qaeda activity. While such a bill will probably founder in the Senate, the possibility of Congressional intervention is much more effective than a mere lecture. Pakistan is among the biggest beneficiaries of U.S. foreign aid, receiving more than $3.5 billion since 2002.
Even if Musharraf were to double the number of troops on the border, says a Western diplomat in Pakistan, chances are it would exacerbate the problem by fueling anti-government sentiment. "The only way you are going to solve the problem of militancy in the tribal areas is through a massive influx of development," he says. "And even then we are talking 10 to 15 years." That's a grim prescription given that senior Taliban Commander Mullah Dadullah promised in a phone call to Reuters last week that "this year will prove to be the bloodiest for the foreign troops. It is not just a threat, we will prove it." He says he will soon be able to field some 10,000 soldiers, of which 2,000 are trained suicide bombers like the one who blew himself up at Bagram Air Force Base this morning. While his numbers may be large exaggerations, the Taliban have managed to briefly take two towns already this year, a chilling warning of things to come.
While Pakistan and Afghanistan trade barbs over who is most responsible for the Taliban surge, it is clear is that without significant changes in both countries the region risks collapsing into another cauldron of violence like the one that helped foster al-Qaeda. "This is the main battle in the war on terrorism," says Abdullah Abdullah, Karzai's former Foreign minister. "Al-Qaeda lost its capital in Afghanistan, and they are creating a perception that they are getting it back. It is crucial for the U.S., for Afghanistan, for Pakistan and for the whole world that we prevent this from happening. Our shared goal should be to do whatever it takes to build Afghanistan as a peaceful state.",8599,1594097,00.html?cnn=yes
Report Spam   Logged

"Nothing gives one person so much advantage over another as to remain always cool and unruffled under all circumstances."

Thomas Jefferson

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Andrew Waters
Hero Member
Posts: 175

« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2007, 11:12:14 pm »


Taliban claim Afghanistan attack was assassination attempt. Blast kills 23, including two Americans.

                         By Alisa Tang
                         Associated Press

Bagram, Afghanistan: In what the Taliban claimed was an assassination attempt, a suicide bomber attacked the main gate of a U.S. military base Tuesday within earshot of Vice President Dick Cheney. The explosion killed 23 people, including two Americans, and delivered a propaganda blow that undercut the U.S. military and the weak Afghan government it supports.


Although the bomber did not get closer than roughly a mile to the vice president, the attack highlighted an increasingly precarious security situation posed by the resurgent Taliban.


A message posted on a website used by militants said ''a mujahadid (holy warrior)...carried out a suicide attack in front of the second gate of the Bagram Air Base....The target was Bush's vice president, Dick Cheney.''

Purported Taliban spokesman Qari Yousef Ahmad, said Cheny was the target of the attack carried out by an Afghan named Mullah Abdul Rahim.

''We knew that Dick Cheney would be staying inside the base,'' Ahmadi said by telephone from an undisclosed location.

But it appeared unlikely the bomber would have been able to reach Cheney, who was in a ''very safe and secure place'' roughly a mile from the blast site, said U.S. spokesman Lt. Col. David Accetta.

The bomber, Accetta said, never tied to get by any U.S.-operated checkpoints and instead walked into a group of Afghans outside the base and detonated himself.

''To characterize this as a direct attempt on the life of the vice president is absurd,'' Accetta said.

Cheney's trip to Afghanistan had not been announced in advance. Snow said he did not know whether publicity about Cheney's overnight stay at the base helped invite the attack--after the planned meeting Monday with Karzai was postponed.

Even though reaching the front gate of the U.S. base could have been achieved with relative ease, the idea of getting through U.S. security to attack Cheney was ''far-fetched,'' in the words of Maj. William Mitchell, a U.S. spokesman.

So which news story is accurate?
« Last Edit: February 28, 2007, 11:17:53 pm by Andrew Waters » Report Spam   Logged
Superhero Member
Posts: 4553

« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2007, 11:06:54 am »

More facts will probably come out about this later, Andrew, but I am of the opinion that Al Quada didn't know that Cheney was there and this is simply bravado on their part.  I may be wrong, but this has the appearance of simply another day in the war on terror.
Report Spam   Logged

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
- Aristotle
Superhero Member
Posts: 11110

« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2007, 02:17:38 pm »

Had it been successful ol George would've gotten nervous.
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy