Message #7358

[Jason]

Now we are measuring CO2 concentrations in the air and are comparing it to dissolved gases in ice cores.  This is the same thing that always occurs, and it is what gets the emotionally-driven scientists in trouble with the logically minded scientists.  Dissolved gases will always be smaller than concentrated ones, and measuring in the vicinity of an active volcanic ring is a sure-fire way to measure a lot of CO2.  This presentation could have come from the Inconvenient Truth movie, they are comparing extremes.

I don't see any emotionally driven scientists involved with this, save for the ones on the skeptic side. Think of it, most have presented literally nothing to back up their assertions (except, of course, the propaganda fed to them by the oil companies), but are so certain that global warming is a "hoax."

As for the agenda on the other side, if a scientist saw some other danger coming to the world, an asteroid, for instance, logically, they would try and warn people about it to stop it. Nothing hysterial or emotional about that, it's simple common sense.