Atlantis is a theological not an archeological subject

[knakker]

Let us not focus on the 9000 years BC. at the expense of the rest of the information that Plato gave us regarding Atlantis. It is all thematically stuff. As the Tenach is thematically composed, the same happened to the Atlantis story. The key actors of the Atlantis story are very well known in the Bible: Dagon, Baäl-Tzafon and Astarte. If Atlantis was really a war between Greece and Atlantis then we should not look back earlier than the Greek-Macedonian empire of Alexander the Great. His destruction of Tyrus resonated with the destruction of Atlantis. A second Greek empire is knocking at the door.

http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0332

https://roodgoudvanparvaim.nl/

[knakker]

Herodotus wrote the the temple of Melqart (Heracles) in Tyrus was already 2300 years old in his time (Herodotus, Histories, Godley vert. 1920, book 2:44). In the Egyptian Book of the Dead, Osiris claimed that he was millions years old (Verb 42). Neither Osiris, neither Herodotus talked about the different aions that the Bible used. The confusion about old civilizations had already begun in Egypt. I would not pay too much credit to these claims. There was simply no temple of Melqart 2300 years before Christ. By the way, the Bible counts from the 70 year weeks up to the baptism of Jesus, not to his birth.