Atlantis Online
March 29, 2024, 06:35:36 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Site provides evidence for ancient comet explosion
http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/nationworld/story/173177.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

An Alternative to Darwinian Evolution

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: An Alternative to Darwinian Evolution  (Read 3871 times)
0 Members and 69 Guests are viewing this topic.
19Merlin69
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 255



WWW
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2007, 11:57:03 am »

Keep in mind that the Theory of Nannobacterium (Nanobes) holds that there is, to some degree, life literally everywhere.  It permeates practically everything

The existing theory holds that the first life evolved from practically nothing, and did so in the presence of a primordial stew of necessary components and favorable conditions.  Its first development was in the form of a single cell, and this cell could do little (if anything).  Who knows if this is correct, but we'll stipulate to it so as to avoid any arguing.  In logic and Statistical analysis classes I teach, I am often disturbed by just how many GRADUATE LEVEL (& Post-graduate) students who do not understand the theory of evolution that they subscribe to.

We need an analogy here though, in order to follow the development and its logic.  Let's use BUBBLES.  Now, what we have here is a pot located somewhere (and in many places) on the planet making bubbles, and these bubbles can do nothing other than form, survive for a bit, then disappear.  From that point, the most important evolution became its ability to consume resources in order to survive.  So, we now have millions of bubbles forming with and without the new trait - so many of the bubbles are surviving for much longer than others.  At this point, we are seeing a steady growth in bubble population; whereas before - we weren't.  By the time this trait developed, billions & billions of BUBBLES (cells) had been created and consumed (churning bubbles for no purpose).  After that, the bubble's ability to replicate was paramount.  So, we have 4 generations of bubbles being made: those who can survive, those who can't, those who can replicate, and those who can't.  What we do have, that is mostly absent from the prevailing theory, is an enormous (and growing) foundation for life.  All of the bubbles that were born, but died, were returned to the primordial stew with ingredients already intact.  Cannibalization must have been an early predator, and it had to have come from the stew itself.  Something had to be present in order to breakdown the early cells and consume them or otherwise return them to their constituents.  It is at this point that we begin to witness differentiation on a grand scale, as the two major players are complete, and the first signs of competition make an appearance.  "What does all this mean?" - you ask.  It means that, logically and statistically (& observationally) speaking, Predation arose early, not due to population control and evolutionary "mis-fires", but because of proximity and a need to utilize resources.  In other words, the preformed, but deceased, life was already there - life figured out how to quickly assimilate it because it utilized less energy to form new life.

Suddenly, the trait of Survival became paramount.  It equates to a way for the emerging life to survive being cannibalized by the advancing life.  This way, the generation 4 (G4) bubbles don't simply consume all of the G1-G3 bubbles, and then start on each other.  Cell membranes and cell division were the next steps in the process - they had to have been.

To a limited degree, and as a further analogy, consider evolution in terms of a computer program for a moment.  Also ponder the possibility that "Life", as we know it, is not the end of the story.  What if "Life" is only the way we understand it now because of the life (nanobes) that we are unaware of?   Theoretically, if early evolution (here or elsewhere in the universe) created subroutines in order to perform the necessary functions, a whole range of "leaps" in evolution would be explained.   Imagine bubbles of varying types developing all over the planet (or universe) and being held in stasis until they are interacted with.  Maybe a little blue, sexually mature bubble encounters a "multi-bubble bubble" and we wind up with a generation of multi-celled life that can procreate....

This was just a bit of "Food for thought" to help you follow my line of thinking.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2007, 07:29:44 pm by 19Merlin69 » Report Spam   Logged

Knowledge is a gift to be given; stupidity, a communicable disease.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy