Atlantis Online
October 23, 2019, 04:53:25 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Did Humans Colonize the World by Boat?
Research suggests our ancestors traveled the oceans 70,000 years ago
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/jun/20-did-humans-colonize-the-world-by-boat
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Was the early universe a better environment for life to evolve?

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Was the early universe a better environment for life to evolve?  (Read 28 times)
Crimson Glory
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 3168



« on: July 04, 2015, 02:21:54 am »

Was the early universe a better environment for life to evolve?

Annalee Newitz
Filed to: space   12/06/13 1:45pm




Was the early universe a better environment for life to evolve?

Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb has just published a paper about how life might have flourished when our 13.8-billion-year-old universe was a mere 15 million years old. Back then, the whole universe was warmer which means liquid water could exist even on planets that were distant from their stars.

Writes Loeb in the abstract for the paper:

    In the redshift range 100<(1+z)<110, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) had a temperature of 273-300K (0-30 degrees Celsius), allowing early rocky planets (if any existed) to have liquid water chemistry on their surface and be habitable, irrespective of their distance from a star. In the standard LCDM cosmology, the first star-forming halos within our Hubble volume started collapsing at these redshifts, allowing the chemistry of life to possibly begin when the Universe was merely 15 million years old. The possibility of life starting when the average matter density was a million times bigger than it is today argues against the anthropic explanation for the low value of the cosmological constant.

Though we often think of the early universe as inhospitable, Loeb notes that if rocky planets existed, it would have been a great time to live on them. No matter where they were in the universe, they would have been bathed in constant warmth, with no need to depend on a star for energy. And the warmth would have made surface water a liquid, too, which would help life as we know it to develop.

Of course there is that little matter of matter density being "a million times bigger than it is today." Hard to say whether that would be a problem or not for the development of life. It certainly would have made our view of the heavens a lot different, and brighter.

The sad part about contemplating Loeb's idea is that it makes you wonder whether the universe was teeming with life back then, and we're merely the sad outliers who happened to evolve in the post-life era. All our potential friends in the universe might have lived (and eventually died out) billions of years ago.

Read the whole paper at Arxiv.


http://io9.com/was-the-early-universe-a-better-environment-for-life-to-1478219374
Report Spam   Logged



Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy