Atlantis Online
October 27, 2020, 06:52:52 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: USA showered by a watery comet ~11,000 years ago, ending the Golden Age of man in America
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

U.S. District Court in Tennessee Puts Green Party and Constitution Party on 2014

Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: U.S. District Court in Tennessee Puts Green Party and Constitution Party on 2014  (Read 69 times)
Hero Member
Posts: 652

« on: March 19, 2014, 04:51:18 pm »

U.S. District Court in Tennessee Puts Green Party and Constitution Party on 2014 Ballot

Published on March 17, 2014, by Richard Winger in Uncategorized.

On March 14, U.S. District Court Judge William J. Haynes, Jr., put the Green Party and the Constitution Party on the 2014 ballot in Tennessee. The case is Green Party of Tennessee v Hargett, middle district, 3:13cv-1128. Here is the 28-page decision.
 The same judge had put the parties on the ballot in 2012. The two parties did not meet the 5% vote test, which, in presidential years, applies only to President. The main basis for the ruling is Equal Protection. Parties that did meet the 5% vote test are safely on the ballot for the next two elections, yet under the statute, as amended a few years ago, parties that successfully submit a petition of 2.5% of the last gubernatorial vote are only on the ballot for one election.
An alternate basis for the decision is that, because the 2.5% petition was held unconstitutional in 2012 and again in 2013, and has not yet been amended, even if the parties arenít entitled to two elections on the Equal Protection claim, they should still be on the ballot because the petition requirement is void and the law hasnít been amended yet. The state is appealing to the Sixth Circuit, but the case isnít being expedited and no hearing date has been set.
The decision also strikes down the law that says newly-qualifying parties must sign a loyalty oath that they do not advocate the violent overthrow of the government. The U.S. Supreme Court had unanimously invalidated a similar Indiana law in 1974. The stateís defense had been that the state doesnít enforce the loyalty oath.
The legislature is currently considering several ballot access bills and it is possible the legislature can pass a bill that addresses this issue and moots any more court proceedings.
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy