Atlantis Online
October 17, 2019, 02:42:00 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Update About Cuba Underwater Megalithic Research
http://www.timstouse.com/EarthHistory/Atlantis/bimini.htm
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Explosion in Number of Potentially Habitable Worlds

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Explosion in Number of Potentially Habitable Worlds  (Read 30 times)
Uriel
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 199



« on: July 04, 2013, 06:10:21 pm »


Explosion in Number of Potentially Habitable Worlds

Climate model predicts 60 billion water-friendly planets around red dwarf stars.



An artists conception of an Exoplanet.

An artist's conception of an exoplanet orbiting a star 30 light-years away from Earth.

Photograph by NASA

Andrew Fazekas

for National Geographic

Published July 3, 2013

The number of potentially habitable worlds circling red dwarf stars—the most abundant type of star in our Milky Way galaxy—may have just doubled to 60 billion, a new study suggests.

Using global climate models originally created for studying global warming on Earth, a team of researchers from the University of Chicago and Northwestern University created 3-D models of how large-scale cloud patterns affect atmospheric temperatures on Earth-size planets orbiting stars smaller and cooler than our sun. (See also: "'Shocking' Superstorm Seen on Exoplanet—A First.")

So what's new? Researchers found that the atmospheric circulation and cloud cover on these exoplanets meant these worlds could orbit their stars more closely than previously thought—expanding the habitable zone around red dwarf stars.

Computer simulations developed by Dorian Abbot, a planetary scientist at the University of Chicago, show that we should be looking at orbits much closer to red dwarfs than we've done in the past for worlds that can support liquidwater and, possibly, life. (Related: "Think Outside the Box to Find Extraterrestrial Life.")

And since red dwarfs are the most common type of star populating the universe, future searches for habitable planets may want to focus on them.

Why is it important? "While we don't have an accurate estimate because they are hard to see, we believe that there are roughly 100 billion red dwarfs in just the Milky Way galaxy alone," said Abbot, co-author of the new study published this week in the The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

"So with these cool dwarf stars being the most common in our galaxy, the closest habitable-zone planet we may find will most likely be orbiting this type of star."

What also makes red dwarf systems such a cosmic catch is that the stars are so small. That means the relative size of any orbiting planet will be larger.

This is a key factor when using the transit method—where a star's brightness dims when a planet glides in front of its host star—to search for exoplanets. (Related: "Bumper Crop of Habitable Worlds Discovered?")

And since red dwarfs are cooler than the sun, their habitable zone—where water can exist in liquid form—will be much closer in than the habitable zones of other types of stars. The result would be exoplanets that experience a year lasting only 30 to 40 days instead of 365 days like on Earth.

Exoplanets orbiting in such habitable zones are so close to their star that they are tidally locked, meaning that they always present the same face to their star.

Since the same face of the planet always points to the star, that half heats upquickly and air rises, creating a global atmospheric circulation and large-scale cloud cover.

The computer models show that these clouds would reflect much of the incoming starlight, thus cooling the planet.

What does this mean? "What this means for planet hunters is that we get to see more orbits, and obtain more measurements, so in the end our hunting techniques just work better," explained Abbot. "We can look for planets hugging their host red dwarf stars much closer than we previously thought was possible.

"Even though the planet is being exposed to twice as much solar energy, we now think there could still be plenty of liquid water on its surface," he said.

Abbot and his team will probably have to wait a few more years to test their findings, when Hubble's more powerful successor, the James Webb Space Telescope, launches in 2018.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/07/130703-habitable-exoplanet-climate-model-clouds-science-space/
Report Spam   Logged

Uriel
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 199



« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2013, 06:11:14 pm »

 Marshall Odom

Planetary atmospheres are constantly subjected to the impact of charged cosmic particles, with the majority originating from the host star’s stellar winds. The cosmic particles are highly pressurized and when the stellar wind is strong, they slam against the magnetosphere, potentially eroding bits of atmosphere if the magnetosphere is not strong enough. Planets with strong magnetic fields like the Earth are better equipped to deflect these particles, making them more suitable for life. A planet’s potential to sustain life is dependent upon its proximity to the host star; the ideal location is not too close and not too far from the host star in a region known as the ‘Goldilocks’ zone or habitable zone. Since red dwarfs are significantly cooler than our Sun, their ‘Goldilocks’ zone would be located much closer in than in our Solar System. Planets in this zone are at the ideal temperature to sustain liquid water. Another essential quality is a relatively dense atmosphere.

New research indicates if the Earth was orbiting a red dwarf (just as it orbits our Sun) along the inner edge of the ‘Goldilocks’ zone, the magnetosphere would only extend out 35,000 km (21,748 mi) and could buckle under the intense pressure from the star’s magnetic field, smashing into the Earth’s surface . In order to sustain life, planets in this habitable zone must have very strong magnetic fields or be further away from the host star, decreasing the chance of having liquid water. If the pressure from a star’s magnetic field is too intense, the planet’s atmosphere may be slowly ripped apart leaving the planet uninhabitable.

Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy