Atlantis Online
June 15, 2019, 08:00:13 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Site provides evidence for ancient comet explosion
http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/nationworld/story/173177.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Cavemen were better at drawing animals than modern artists

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Cavemen were better at drawing animals than modern artists  (Read 55 times)
Prokopiak
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 821



« on: December 09, 2012, 03:05:02 pm »

Cavemen were better at drawing animals than modern artists

December 5, 2012 Cavemen were better at drawing animals than modern artists Enlarge This is a prehistoric illustration of an elephant from the Libian Tadrart Acacus. Credit: Citation: Horvath G, Farkas E, Boncz I, Blaho M, Kriska G (2012) Cavemen Were Better at Depicting Quadruped Walking than Modern Artists: Erroneous Walking Illustrations in the Fine Arts from Prehistory to Today. PLoS ONE 7(12): e49786. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049786 Prehistoric artists were better at portraying the walk of four-legged animals in their art than modern man, according to new research published December 5 in the open access journal PLoS ONE by Gabor Horvath and colleagues from Eotvos University (Budapest), Hungary. Ads by Google Original Party Standups™ - Your Photo - Laser-Cut - Life-Size! Quantity Discounts & Next-Day Rush. - www.PartyStandups.com Most quadrupeds have a similar sequence in which they move each limb as they walk, trot or run, and this sequence was studied and outlined in the early 1880s by Eadweard Muybridge. The authors examined prehistoric and modern artwork ranging from cave paintings of cows and elephants to statues and paintings of horses, elephants and other quadrupeds in motion to see how well these artistic depictions matched the scientific observations of animal motion. They found that the majority of depictions of these animals walking or trotting had their legs incorrectly positioned, but the prehistoric paintings had the lowest error rates of 46.2%, whereas modern pre-Muybridgean art depicted animal motion incorrectly 83.5% of the time. This error rate decreased to 57.9% after 1887. Whether these differences were due to artistic license with imagery or lack of understanding of animal movement isn't clear, say the authors. More information: Horvath G, Farkas E, Boncz I, Blaho M, Kriska G (2012) Cavemen Were Better at Depicting Quadruped Walking than Modern Artists: Erroneous Walking Illustrations in the Fine Arts from Prehistory to Today. PLoS ONE 7(12): e49786. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049786 Journal reference: PLoS ONE search and more info website Provided by Public Library of Science

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2012-12-cavemen-animals-modern-artists.html#jCp
Report Spam   Logged

Prokopiak
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 821



« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2012, 03:06:06 pm »



This is a prehistoric illustration of an elephant from the Libian Tadrart Acacus. Credit: Citation: Horvath G, Farkas E, Boncz I, Blaho M, Kriska G (2012) Cavemen Were Better at Depicting Quadruped Walking than Modern Artists: Erroneous Walking Illustrations in the Fine Arts from Prehistory to Today. PLoS ONE 7(12): e49786. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049786

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2012-12-cavemen-animals-modern-artists.html#jCp
Report Spam   Logged
Prokopiak
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 821



« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2012, 03:07:11 pm »

Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum | Buy traffic for your forum/website
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy