Atlantis Online
April 19, 2024, 11:01:28 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: DID A COMET CAUSE A FIRESTORM THAT DEVESTATED NORTH AMERICA 12,900 YEARS AGO?
http://atlantisonline.smfforfree2.com/index.php/topic,1963.0.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Sopa and Pipa bills postponed in US Congress

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sopa and Pipa bills postponed in US Congress  (Read 246 times)
0 Members and 156 Guests are viewing this topic.
Astor Kitsimble
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 2211



« on: January 20, 2012, 08:04:26 pm »

Sopa and Pipa bills postponed in US Congress
Sopa and Pipa protesters in San Francisco 18 January 2012 Protesters say the passage of the anti-online piracy bills would threaten the openness of the internet



    * Hackers retaliate over Megaupload
    * Who backs the anti-piracy laws?
    * US anti-piracy bills explained

The US Congress has halted debate on two contested anti-online piracy bills.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid delayed a vote on the Protect IP Act (Pipa) scheduled for Tuesday.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith then said his panel would not consider the Stop Online Piracy Act (Sopa) until a compromise was reached.

The decisions follow protests by online encyclopaedia Wikipedia, and thousands of other websites, which went "dark" in protest for 24 hours earlier this week.

"In light of recent events, I have decided to postpone Tuesday's vote on the PROTECT IP Act," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, said in a statement on Friday.

Mr Smith, a Texas Republican in the House of Representatives, said in a statement: "I have heard from the critics and I take seriously their concerns regarding proposed legislation to address the problem of online piracy.

"It is clear that we need to revisit the approach on how best to address the problem of foreign thieves that steal and sell American inventions and products."
'Censoring the web'

Of about 40 co-sponsors for the Pipa bill, a handful withdrew their support on Wednesday, as thousands of websites participated in a co-ordinated online protest.
Continue reading the main story
Sopa and Pipa explained

The US bills are designed to block access to sites containing unauthorised copyright material.

Content owners and the US government would be given the power to request court orders to shut down sites associated with piracy.

Advertisers, payment processors and internet service providers would be forbidden from doing business with infringers based overseas.

Sopa also requires search engines to remove foreign infringing sites from their results, a provision absent in Pipa.

    * Full explanation on Sopa and Pipa

Floods of emails and phone calls to congressmen followed the online protests, prompting some lawmakers to withdraw their support for the measures.

More than seven million people signed a petition on Google saying that passage of the legislation would result in censoring the web and impose a regulatory burden on businesses.

Both bills focus on responding to online piracy, specifically illegal copies of films and other media.

The bills would also outlaw sites from containing information about how to access blocked sites.

The Motion Picture Association of America, a key supporter of the legislation, has campaigned strongly against the violation of copyright laws.

But on Thursday evening their website was targeted by a hacking group known as Anonymous.
Celebrity backing

Anonymous also claimed credit for blocking access to the US Department of Justice and FBI websites, by launching a so-called "denial-of-service" attach that bombards their websites with traffic.

The move was being seen as a retaliation after the Department of Justice shut down a major file-sharing website, Megaupload.

The firm's co-founders have been charged with violating existing anti-piracy laws.

Four Megaupload employees were arrested in Auckland, New Zealand, at the request of US authorities.

Police seized cash, valuable cars and a short-barrelled shotgun from the residence of the website's German founder, Kim Dotcom, formerly known as Kim Schmitz.

Their Hong Kong-based site had around 150 million users and 50 million daily hits.

It has received celebrity endorsements from artists such as Alicia Keys and Kanye West, making it one of the internet's most high profile file-sharing platforms.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16655272
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Astor Kitsimble
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 2211



« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2012, 08:20:46 pm »

[size=140pt]Sopa and Pipa anti-piracy bills controversy explained[/size]




Pirate flag The US laws are designed to block pirate sites, but critics say it will also impact the wider net
Continue reading the main story
Related Stories

    * Sites protest US anti-piracy move
    * Murdoch attack rebuffed by Google
    * Spain adopts tough new piracy law

The Stop Online Piracy Act (Sopa) is the bill being considered by the House of Representatives.

The Protect Intellectual Property Act (Pipa) is the parallel bill being considered by the Senate.

The proposed legislation is designed to tackle online piracy, with particular emphasis on illegal copies of films and other forms of media hosted on foreign servers.

The bills propose that anyone found guilty of streaming copyrighted content without permission 10 or more times within six months should face up to five years in jail.

The US government and rights holders would have the right to seek court orders against any site accused of "enabling or facilitating" piracy. This could theoretically involve an entire website being shut down because it contains a link to a suspect site.

US-based internet service providers, payment processors and advertisers would be outlawed from doing business with alleged copyright infringers. Sopa also calls for search engines to remove infringing sites from their results - Pipa does not include this provision.

The bills would also outlaw sites from containing information about how to access blocked sites.

The bills originally demanded that internet service providers block users from being able to access suspect sites using a technique called Domain Name System (DNS) blocking.
ISP immunity

This would effectively make them "disappear" from the internet - and is a process already used in China and Iran. However, after opponents claimed this could disrupt the internet's underlying architecture, the chief sponsor of each bill agreed to ditch the measure.

To protect sites against false claims of illegal activity Sopa proposes penalising copyright holders who knowingly misrepresent a site's activity - however, Pipa does not contain this safeguard.

Both bills offer immunity to ISPs that block access to websites if they have "credible evidence" that the third party's pages contain unsanctioned copyright material. Critics claim this could create a conflict of interest as it may encourage firms to block access to competitors' sites.

It could also encourage firms to take a "safety first" approach resulting in users being prevented from viewing legal material.

Sopa's supporters are trying to reach consensus on the bill before putting it to a vote in the House of Representatives, which suggests that any vote may be some way off.

Senate majority leader Harry Reid plans to put Pipa up for a vote in the upper house on 24 January.

Supporters of the bills include television networks, music publishers, movie industry bodies, book publishers and manufacturers.

Critics include Google, Facebook, Twitter, Wikipedia, Yahoo, eBay, LinkedIn, AOL and Zynga.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16596577
Report Spam   Logged
Astor Kitsimble
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 2211



« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2012, 08:26:04 pm »

Who backs the anti-piracy laws?
By Daniel Nasaw BBC News, Washington



Chris Dodd Motion Picture Association of America chief Chris Dodd was a US Senator for more than 20 years
Related Stories

    * Wikipedia founder explains shutdown
    * Sites join US anti-piracy protest
    * US anti-piracy bills explained

Who supports the anti-online piracy bills in the US Congress, and why?

The two anti-piracy bills being debated in the US Congress have the backing of some of the largest film, television, music recording and book publishing companies and trade associations in the US.

The companies say their industries are under threat from online piracy, and they have turned to the US Congress for protection.

The bill's backers hope the measures in the legislation will stem the tide of piracy.

"It's a non-market strategy for making money," said Scott Ainsworth, a political scientist at the University of Georgia who has studied lobbying.

"Think about a firm that says we can make better widgets and that will make us money, or we can lobby to protect the widgets that we produce from competition, and that will make us money."

The recording industry is one of the most glaring examples of a business stung by illegal online downloading.

In 2010 - after more than a decade of widespread online piracy - retail music sales declined 11% from the year before.

How do the companies go about influencing Congress?

In part, by spending heaps of cash lobbying the US Congress for legislation to enact laws that would punish repeat copyright offenders and bar US-based internet service providers, payment processors and advertisers from doing business with alleged infringers.

Television, film and recording industry companies and trade associations spent $92m (£60m) on lobbying expenses in 2011, including on the online piracy and copyright protection issues, according to an analysis of lobbying disclosure forms by the Center for Responsive Politics.

The companies and associations employed 596 lobbyists last year.

It is not possible to break down figures spent lobbying specifically on the Stop Online Piracy Act (Sopa) and Protect Intellectual Property Act (Pipa) anti-piracy bills. But the sheer amount indicates the companies and associations were keen to maintain access to the members of Congress and their staffs.

Sopa is currently being debated by the House Judiciary Committee, and Pipa is to be voted on by the Senate later this month.

Who are the lobbyists, and what do they do?

In what is frequently derided as Washington's revolving door, many lobbyists and industry advocates in Washington are former members of Congress or held roles as congressional staff.

Some of those worked on the very congressional committees they now hope to influence.

For instance, one of the chief lobbyists for the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), senior executive vice-president Mitch Glazier, is former chief counsel for intellectual property on the House Judiciary Committee.

That committee is currently debating the Sopa legislation. Its chairman is Sopa's chief sponsor, Republican Lamar Smith of Texas.

The Motion Picture Association of America, Hollywood's primary advocate in Washington, is led by former Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris Dodd.

"The movie industry has a terrific amount of access and good will on both sides of the aisle," said Frank Baumgartner, a political scientist at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill who studies lobbying.

"Everyone loves Hollywood, it's a major American source of jobs. They just have a wonderful reputation in Washington."

In meetings with congressmen, senators and their staffs, the lobbyists will recommend provisions they want to see passed into law, and even offer draft legislation written by industry lawyers.

"The term on Capitol Hill is 'we need some language on this'," said Prof Ainsworth.

How do lobbyists win lawmakers to their side?

Communication between lobbyists and lawmakers is not typically made public, but it's a safe bet lobbyists will tout the number of people employed in a particular congressman's district and the economic contribution there.

The US film and sound recording industries employed about 374,000 people in 2010, according to a report by the Congressional Research Service prepared for Democratic Oregon Senator Ron Wyden.

For its part, the MPAA says the television and film industries employ 2.2 million people in all 50 states and paid more than $137bn in wages in 2009.

In addition, lobbyists in Washington help lawmakers raise money for their re-election campaigns - and often contribute directly.

For instance, since 1997, the MPAA's campaign finance wing has contributed more than $775,000 to congressional campaigns and political action committees, according to reports from the Federal Election Commission.

Mr Glazier, the RIAA lobbyist, has personally donated more than $40,000 since 2000.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16603870
Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2012, 01:01:52 pm »

Liberals, conservatives, centrists, lefty-libertarians, and righty-libertarians may not agree on much but it is nice to see how all of us came together to stifle the Globalists' Authoritarian Censorship Agenda.
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy