Atlantis Online
November 30, 2020, 03:11:52 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Towering Ancient Tsunami Devastated the Mediterranean
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

London built with the blood of British slaves

Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: London built with the blood of British slaves  (Read 104 times)
Superhero Member
Posts: 3478

« on: December 17, 2011, 03:57:07 am »

London built with the blood of British slaves
Emine Sinmaz
15 Dec 2011

Grisly find: skulls believed to belong to Iceni tribesmen, loyal to Boudica

The Romans founded London as a centre of trade and business in about AD 50 - or so archaeologists have long believed.

But new evidence suggests the capital has a more chilling history, built as a military base by slaves who were then slaughtered. Hundreds of skulls discovered along the course of the "lost" river Walbrook suggest London may have been built by forced labour.

Dominic Perring, director of the Centre for Applied Archaeology at University College London, says the skulls could be those of Queen Boudica's rebel Iceni tribesmen who were brought to London to build a new military base.

In an essay published in this month's British Archaeology magazine, Mr Perring argues that some of the skulls had been de-fleshed, which suggests the slaves may have been executed after building work was finished.

Mike Pitts, the editor of British Archaeology, said: "At a time when we're all wondering and worrying about the future of the City of London it's interesting to reflect on its foundation, which seems to have been very bloody indeed.

"The team has been looking at the evidence accumulated from decades of new excavation, and they offer a more convincing, and chilling, alternative to what has long been believed."

Mr Perring added: "The timbers were prepared using 'native' British woodworking techniques, unlike the Roman carpentry used everywhere else. Might this have been the work of forced labour? Several hundred late Iron Age or early Roman skulls, from a population that must have numbered in thousands, have been found in and around the Walbrook and were predominantly of young males. London's civic centre was ignored in the rebuilding, and no new temples or basilicas were erected. This suggests London lacked independent legal status and remained under direct military control.

"It was singled out for attention in the period after the revolt because of its military importance, as both the site of an earlier fort and the principal port that supplied the army. This was the commanding centre from which Roman power in Britain was exercised."
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Superhero Member
Posts: 3478

« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2011, 03:59:08 am »

Boudica had large areas of London burnt down shortly after Colchester so is it suggested these slaves were used to rebuild it?
The Iceni were the tribe living around Norfolk the Catuvellauni or Cantiaci (Kent) would have been the local tribes.
I wonder if any DNA can be obtained as there is a theory that the tribes in this part of England were Germanic not Celtic.

Bloody Romans
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy