Obama Beats ALL the Republican Presidential Candidates in Latest Polls

[Krista Davenport]

President Obama vs. Republican Candidates
General Election: Romney vs. Obama
Poll   Date   Sample   Obama (D)   Romney (R)   Spread
RCP Average   9/22 - 10/17   --   45.8   45.2   Obama +0.6
Rasmussen Reports   10/16 - 10/17   1000 LV   43   42   Obama +1
Time   10/9 - 10/10   838 LV   48   44   Obama +4
PPP (D)   10/7 - 10/10   700 RV   45   45   Tie
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl   10/6 - 10/10   RV   46   44   Obama +2
Quinnipiac   9/27 - 10/3   2118 RV   42   46   Romney +4
ABC News/Wash Post   9/29 - 10/2   RV   46   48   Romney +2
Pew Research   9/22 - 10/4   1901 RV   48   48   Tie
FOX News   9/25 - 9/27   925 RV   45   42   Obama +3
CNN/Opinion Research   9/23 - 9/25   917 RV   49   48   Obama +1

More Polling Data | News
General Election: Perry vs. Obama
Poll   Date   Sample   Obama (D)   Perry (R)   Spread
RCP Average   9/22 - 10/11   --   49.1   41.7   Obama +7.4
Rasmussen Reports   10/10 - 10/11   1000 LV   49   35   Obama +14
Time   10/9 - 10/10   838 LV   51   40   Obama +11
PPP (D)   10/7 - 10/10   700 RV   49   40   Obama +9
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl   10/6 - 10/10   RV   51   39   Obama +12
Quinnipiac   9/27 - 10/3   2118 RV   45   44   Obama +1
ABC News/Wash Post   9/29 - 10/2   RV   49   46   Obama +3
Pew Research   9/22 - 10/4   1901 RV   50   46   Obama +4
FOX News   9/25 - 9/27   925 RV   47   39   Obama +8
CNN/Opinion Research   9/23 - 9/25   917 RV   51   46   Obama +5

More Polling Data | News
General Election: Cain vs. Obama
Poll   Date   Sample   Obama (D)   Cain (R)   Spread
RCP Average   10/6 - 10/15   --   47.0   40.3   Obama +6.7
Rasmussen Reports   10/14 - 10/15   1000 LV   41   43   Cain +2
Time   10/9 - 10/10   838 LV   50   38   Obama +12
PPP (D)   10/7 - 10/10   700 RV   48   42   Obama +6
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl   10/6 - 10/10   RV   49   38   Obama +11

More Polling Data | News
General Election: Gingrich vs. Obama
Poll   Date   Sample   Obama (D)   Gingrich (R)   Spread
RCP Average   10/7 - 10/13   --   49.5   36.5   Obama +13.0
Rasmussen Reports   10/12 - 10/13   1000 LV   49   34   Obama +15
PPP (D)   10/7 - 10/10   700 RV   50   39   Obama +11

More Polling Data | News
General Election: Paul vs. Obama
Poll   Date   Sample   Obama (D)   Paul (R)   Spread
RCP Average   8/17 - 10/10   --   47.6   41.4   Obama +6.2
PPP (D)   10/7 - 10/10   700 RV   47   39   Obama +8
Rasmussen Reports   9/24 - 9/25   1000 LV   44   34   Obama +10
CNN/Opinion Research   9/23 - 9/25   917 RV   51   47   Obama +4
Reuters/Ipsos   9/8 - 9/12   932 RV   49   42   Obama +7
Gallup   8/17 - 8/18   879 RV   47   45   Obama +2

More Polling Data | News
General Election: Bachmann vs. Obama
Poll   Date   Sample   Obama (D)   Bachmann (R)   Spread
RCP Average   9/8 - 10/10   --   51.8   37.6   Obama +14.2
PPP (D)   10/7 - 10/10   700 RV   50   38   Obama +12
CNN/Opinion Research   9/23 - 9/25   917 RV   54   42   Obama +12
Rasmussen Reports   9/20 - 9/21   1000 LV   48   32   Obama +16
McClatchy/Marist   9/13 - 9/14   825 RV   53   40   Obama +13
Reuters/Ipsos   9/8 - 9/12   932 RV   54   36   Obama +18

More Polling Data | News
General Election: Huntsman vs. Obama
Poll   Date   Sample   Obama (D)   Huntsman (R)   Spread
RCP Average   8/29 - 9/17   --   47.0   38.0   Obama +9.0
Rasmussen Reports   9/16 - 9/17   1000 LV   43   35   Obama +8
Reuters/Ipsos   9/8 - 9/12   932 RV   51   37   Obama +14
ABC News/Wash Post   8/29 - 9/1   RV   47   42   Obama +5

More Polling Data | News
General Election: Santorum vs. Obama
Poll   Date   Sample   Obama (D)   Santorum (R)   Spread
Rasmussen Reports   10/2 - 10/3   1000 LV   45   34   Obama +11
Rasmussen Reports   7/10 - 7/11   1000 LV   45   31   Obama +14

More Polling Data | News
General Election: Republican vs. Obama
Poll   Date   Sample   Republican (R)   Obama (D)   Spread
RCP Average   8/17 - 10/16   --   43.8   42.0   Republican +1.8
Rasmussen Reports   10/10 - 10/16   3500 LV   47   43   Republican +4
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl   10/6 - 10/10   RV   42   44   Obama +2
Gallup   10/6 - 10/9   876 RV   46   38   Republican +8
Pew Research   8/17 - 8/21   1205 RV   40   43   Obama +3


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html

[Volitzer]

Yeah among Ed Schultz and Stefi Miller fans.

I wonder how many in this poll has even heard of the Globalists ?

[Krista Davenport]

You do know that all the major research firms are represented above there, right?  Did you see he is even beating Romney in a FOX News poll? Yes, I am sure that they polled no one but liberal supporters.

Pretty sad that you are so blinded by your bias that you can't even see the truth. 

[Volitzer]

Romney wrote Obamacare.  They are Globalists of a feather.

FOX News polls are notoriously biased.

[Krista Davenport]

Yeah, they are biased alright, towards conservatives!

That's why I printed the realclearpolitcs numbers which average ALL the polls. People aren't happy with the economy, but they know the Repugs not only got us into this mess and have no way to fix it.  Plus, let's face it, the Repuglican candidates are all clowns anyway.

[Volitzer]

All Globalist candidates are clowns regardless of party affiliation.

Yet Democrats act like they've done a good job keeping them out of their party.

GE leaves USA
 
General Electric is planning to move its 115-year-old X-ray division from Waukesha, WI, to Beijing. In addition to moving the headquarters, the company will invest $2 billion in China and train more than 65 engineers and create six research centers. This is the same GE that made $5.1 billion in the United States last year, but paid no taxes-the same company that employs more people overseas than it does in the United States.
 
So let me get this straight. President Obama appointed GE Chairman Jeff Immelt to head his commission on job creation (job czar). Immelt is supposed to help create jobs. I guess the President forgot to tell him in which country he was supposed to be creating those jobs.
 
If this doesn't show you the total lack of leadership of this President, I don't know what does.  Please pass this information to others and think about it before you buy a GE product.
 
 
 
 
http://news.businessweek.com/article.asp?documentKey=1376-LOUVYE1A74E901-5NJ1IVKV8LVLITS4VGNO46MQH9
 

[Krista Davenport]

Actually, that is wrong, you have your facts wrong, as usual.

GE Healthcare X-Ray Division

At the end of July, GE Healthcare announced it would move 4 executives of the X-Ray Division to China to lead the development of specific products for use in China. Subsequent media reports inaccurately described the announcement – GE is not moving its entire X-Ray Division to China. The team on the ground in China will develop X-Ray products suited to the specific needs of the Chinese market: for example, Chinese hospitals in rural markets require very basic products. This on the ground business development will help support jobs at home.

GE’s overall business in China—across all divisions—will support nearly 4,500 American jobs, including those along GE’s U.S. supply chain.

http://www.gereports.com/ge-and-china-growing-market-overseas-more-jobs-at-home/

GE is adding 125 new workers at the Greenville plant this year, part of an overall addition of 6,500 manufacturing staffers in the United States since 2009.

http://www.gereports.com/ge-and-china-growing-market-overseas-more-jobs-at-home/

[Krista Davenport]

Poor Volitzer.  Its a hard lift trying to get Ron Paul beyond single digits in the polls, isn't it? 

[Volitzer]

Not really.  Ron Paul has a grand support base.

We can't develop the products here and then ship them to China.  This is just more of bringing technology and know-how to China, teaching the Chinese the trade only to have it later be taken away from Americans cuz China does it cheaper.

We know how this stuff works and Americans always lose more than they gain in the end.

[Krista Davenport]

Yeah, a steady 9% in all the polls!  If you think that is enough, good for you, you'll have a moral victory. And don't worry about Ron Paul trying to give new tech to China, they find a way to STEAL everything this country invents. Ron Paul would make it easier for China to steal, bet they like him.

[Volitzer]

Versus Obama taking orders from the Bilderberg Group and sending stuff to China anyway.  Bright !!!!!!!!!!!

At least Ron Paul will do the will of the American people and not let Globalists tell him what to do.

[Krista Davenport]

Oh, sure, the will of the American people is really to have more free trade with China (like Paul wants to do), end their Social Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance, send blacks back to segregation and end the minimum wage. Those are all other things Ron Paul wants to do and you suggest people support him despite these stands.  Bright!

[Volitzer]

No politician has the power to bring back segregation, it'll never happen so it is a non-issue.

Ron Paul will never get the votes to end these programs, what he talks about is gearing up the economy so well that these programs are minimally needed.  You know when people are self-successful they don't need government programs.  He never said he was going to end them outright that's just more left-wing crap.

Ron Paul will look at the China situation, he'll see how they cheat and then Congress will pass tariffs to give Americans a level playing field.  He probably knows more about economics then a room full of gulliberals.  Believe me he has it handled.

[Krista Davenport]

No politician has the power to bring back segregation, it'll never happen so it is a non-issue.

Shows what you know. The Southern states are forced every year to comply with the Civil Rights Act because of their history of segregation. All  ANY administration would have to do is stop enforcement of the Civil Rights Act (like they have with the Sherman Anti-Trust Bill, which breaks up companies that try to start monopolies) and segregation would be "allowed" to happen all over again.  Don't think it wouldn't either, with all the bigots still in this country.

You know when people are self-successful they don't need government programs.  He never said he was going to end them outright that's just more left-wing crap.

The hell he didn't. He said, on more than one occasion he wanted to "wean" people off of them.

Ron Paul will look at the China situation, he'll see how they cheat and then Congress will pass tariffs to give Americans a level playing field.

Even though he wrote four editorials stating how he thought tariffs on China were a bad idea. Bright!

[Volitzer]

Shows what you know. The Southern states are forced every year to comply with the Civil Rights Act because of their history of segregation. All  ANY administration would have to do is stop enforcement of the Civil Rights Act (like they have with the Sherman Anti-Trust Bill, which breaks up companies that try to start monopolies) and segregation would be "allowed" to happen all over again.  Don't think it wouldn't either, with all the bigots still in this country.

Exactly my point no politician in their right mind is going to campaign on repealing any of these laws.

The hell he didn't. He said, on more than one occasion he wanted to "wean" people off of them.

wean   /win/  Show Spelled[ween]  Show IPA
verb (used with object)
1.to accustom (a child or young animal) to food other than its mother's milk; cause to lose the need to suckle or turn to the mother for food.
2.to withdraw (a person, the affections, one's dependency, etc.) from some object, habit, form of enjoyment, or the like: The need to reduce had weaned us from rich desserts.

Yes Ron Paul would take those capeable on welfare and wean them back into the working world of productivity and self-sufficiency.

Even though he wrote four editorials stating how he thought tariffs on China were a bad idea. Bright!

Tariffs do stifle growth, however even he has got to see that we are borrowing $ 2 Billion a day from China and will come to the right conclusion when he's elected.