Atlantis Online
March 28, 2024, 09:44:44 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Secrets of ocean birth laid bare 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5191384.stm#graphic
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Occupy Wall Street ‘Stands In Solidarity’ With Obama Front Group

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Occupy Wall Street ‘Stands In Solidarity’ With Obama Front Group  (Read 458 times)
0 Members and 41 Guests are viewing this topic.
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« on: October 05, 2011, 04:50:22 pm »

Occupy Wall Street ‘Stands In Solidarity’ With Obama Front Group


Why is the official OWS website in league with lobbying fronts for the Wall Street-backed Obama White House?

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Fears expressed by some that the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement is being hijacked by the Democratic Party establishment have intensified after the official OWS website announced that it “stands in solidarity” with MoveOn.org, a lobbying group for the Wall Street-backed Obama administration.


The front page of the http://occupywallst.org/ proudly announces that numerous union groups will be present in New York today to join demonstrators in marches taking place this afternoon.

“Together we will protest this great injustice. We stand in solidarity with the honest workers of….MoveOn.org,” states the website, as well as listing numerous other organizations.

What is MoveOn.org?

MoveOn.org is a lobbying organization that routinely backs Democratic candidates. The group aggressively supported Barack Obama’s 2008 election campaign and is now “Perhaps the lead lobby organization for his policies….apart from Obama’s own Organizing for America,” reports Source Watch.

When MoveOn organized an online donation drive for Obama which raised $320,000, the Obama campaign responded in kind with the legally dubious action of paying MoveOn $18,000 in “credit card processing fees”.

The group also received a $5 million dollar donation from George Soros, who is a keen supporter.

Back in 2007, many leftists spoke of their betrayal by MoveOn.org after the group advocated Nancy Pelosi’s funding bill that actually prolonged the war in Iraq and prevented the troops being brought home.

“Join us on Wednesday to create a huge show of support for anti-Wall Street actions nationwide. Together, we’ll add hundreds of thousands of voices expressing our solidarity with the protests at Occupy Wall Street and across the country targeting the bankers who wrecked our economy,” states MoveOn.org’s website.

Yes – the very same bankers – Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup prime amongst them – who financed the Obama campaign, the same campaign vehemently supported by MoveOn.org.

Why does Occupy Wall Street’s support for MoveOn.org represent a problem? Because MoveOn.org is little more than a lobbying front for the Obama administration, which itself is a creature of Wall Street.

Another group that OWS website expresses its “solidarity” with, AFL-CIO, has also announced that it will likely back Wall Street puppet Obama in 2012.

The OWS website also stands in solidarity with SEIU (Service Employees International Union), a group that spent $28 million dollars supporting Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, making it the “organization that spent the most to help Barack Obama get elected president.”

Why is the website that has positioned itself as the central hub for Occupy Wall Street activists announcing its support for groups which are little more than Barack Obama lobbying fronts? Wall Street spent millions financing Obama’s path to the White House and are supporting him to an even greater extent in 2012.

Why is a website that claims to represent anti-Wall Street demonstrators siding with groups that have aggressively supported the Wall Street-backed Obama administration?

Some have argued that it is not fair to cite postings on OccupyWallst.org as representative of the movement’s character or goals. However, this is not a forum posting by an individual, it is prominently displayed on the front page of the website claiming it represents OWS.

Either the Occupy Wall Street website represents an accurate reflection of the sentiments of the protesters, that is supportive of the Wall Street-financed Obama administration and its lobbying front groups such as MoveOn.org, or the message has been hijacked by these very groups.

Either way it represents a threat to the promise made by other OWS activists to remain non-partisan.

Who is running this website and why are they ‘standing in solidarity’ with organizations like MoveOn.org that have aggressively supported the Wall-Street backed Obama administration?

I am going to submit this question to the forum users on the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ website and write a follow up piece on their response. That way we can move a lot closer to understanding whether what is posing as the official website for this “leaderless” group is really representative of the OWS demonstrators or not.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/occupy-wall-street-stands-in-solidarity-with-obama-front-group.html
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Krista Davenport
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5018



« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2011, 12:42:39 am »

Hijacked by the Democratic Party and the unions???

You are out of your mind. Who do you think supports ordinary people?  It's the unions and the Democratic Party, you dweeb.

Liberatarian, Repuiblican and "Constitution" Party policies only support the rich.  Sorry to break it to you, but you are just a schill for the big corporations.
Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2011, 04:01:30 pm »

Again how many jobs went to foreigners and illegal aliens versus American citizens under Obama ?

You know as reported by Dennis Kucinich, that Democrat from Ohio.   Wink
Report Spam   Logged
Krista Davenport
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5018



« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2011, 11:47:22 pm »

Like he could do any better if he were President. Again, who care what Kucinich says?  All he is a younger version of Ralph Nader:  a guy who bi*tches about things so he can get in the spotlight.  And if he thinks that the President can stop outsourcing all by his lonesome, he is mistaken.  Congress has to pass a bill to stop outsourcing before the President can sign it and no way is a Repuglican house going to do that.

Plus, it was the Rethuglicans who stripped the "Buy American" provision from the stimulus, you know, Republicans like Ron Paul, who only support the rich. Wink
Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2011, 01:57:56 pm »

You know this for a fact....

Prove it.

As far as I know Ron Paul did not support any of the stimuli or the bail-outs.
Report Spam   Logged
Krista Davenport
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5018



« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2011, 04:48:37 pm »

He supports free trade, especially with China.  To the extent that he doesn't support trade treaties, it's because he thinks they are "unconstitutional," like all of his other BS stands.

More links about his feelings about trade with China:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul266.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul338.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul268.html
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/china1.html

So, bottom line, if you support Ron Paul because you thinks he is for ending free trade, guess what?  You're wrong.  He's all for free trade.  He just thinks that companies shouldn't have to abide by any treaties to do it! In this case, eliminating NAFTA and CAFTA would just give companies more rights to screw you over, not less. Most of you Ron Paull supporters don't know your candidate very well.

Obama has at least slapped some tariffs on China when it comes to their trade abuses (with steel), Ron Paul wouldn't even do that.
Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2011, 03:35:36 pm »

Don't Start a Trade War With China

by Rep. Ron Paul, MD

Before the US House of Representatives, July 26, 2005

Mr. Speaker: I rise in strong opposition to this legislation. Isn't it ironic that the proponents of “free trade agreements” like CAFTA are lining up squarely behind a bill like this that threatens a trade war with China, and at the least calls for the United States to initiate protectionist measures such as punitive tariffs against “subsidized” sectors of the Chinese economy? In reality, this bill, which appeared out of the blue on the House Floor as a suspension bill, is part of a deal made with several Members in return for a few votes on CAFTA. That is why it is ironic: to get to “free trade” with Central America we first need to pass protectionist legislation regarding China.

Mr. Speaker, in addition to the irony of the protectionist flavor of this bill, let me say that we should be careful what we demand of the Chinese government. Take the demand that the government “revalue” its currency, for example. First, there is sufficient precedent to suggest that doing this would have very little effect on China's trade surplus with the United States. As Barron's magazine pointed out recently, “the Japanese yen's value has more than tripled since the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system, yet Japan's trade surplus remains huge. Why should the unpegging of the Chinese yuan have any greater impact?”

As was pointed out in the Wall Street Journal recently, with the yuan tied to several foreign currencies and the value of the dollar dropping, China could be less inclined to purchase dollars as a way of keeping the yuan down. Fewer Treasury bond purchases by China, in turn, would drive bond prices down and boost yields — which, subsequently, would cause borrowing costs for residential and some corporate customers to increase. Does anyone want to guess what a sudden burst of the real estate bubble might mean for the shaky US economy? This is not an argument for the status quo, however, but rather an observation that there are often unforeseen consequences when we demand that foreign governments manipulate their currency to US “advantage.”

They should have done this in the 1990s, not wait until 2005 after a slew of corporations relocated there. 

At the very least, American consumers will immediately feel the strengthening of the yuan in the form of higher US retail prices. This will disproportionately affect Americans of lower incomes and, as a consequence, slow the economy and increase the hardship of those struggling to get by. Is this why our constituents have sent us here?

Yeah prices will go up but then Americans will go to work to produce them cheaper.   I think by now 8/10/2011 someone has clued him into the New World Order's 26 Tenents and how the Globalists manipulate world markets.

In conclusion, I strongly oppose this ill-considered and potentially destructive bill, and I hope my colleagues will join me in rejecting it.

July 28, 2005


Currency manipulation is just one issue regarding America in global trade.  The manipulation of the yuan has done its job.  All the corporate equity is now making the yuan stronger and the dollar weaker.  Just like the NWO wanted it too.


26 Tenets of the New World Order:

1) Men are inclined to evil rather than good.

2) Preach Liberalism.

3) Use ideals of freedom to bring about class wars.

4) Any and all means necessary should be used to reach their goals as they are justified.

5) Believe their rights lie in force.

6) The power of their resources must remain invisible until the very moment that they have gained the strength so that no group or force can undermine it.

7) Advocates a mob psychology to obtain control of the masses

8 ) Promotes the use of alcohol, drugs, moral corruption, and all forms of vice to systematically corrupt the youth of the nation.

9) Seize citizens’ private property by any means necessary.

10) The use of slogans such as equity, liberty, and fraternity are used on the masses as psychological warfare.

11) War should be directed so that the nations on both sides are placed further in debt and peace conferences are designed so that neither combatant retain territory rights.

12) Members must use their wealth to have candidates chosen to public office who would be obedient to their demands, and would be used as pawns in the game by the men behind the scenes. The advisors will have been bred, reared, and trained from childhood to rule the affairs of the world.

13) Control the press, and hence most of the information the public receives.

14) Agents and provocateurs will come forward after creating traumatic situations, and appear to be the saviors of the masses, when they are actually interested in just the opposite, the reduction of the population.

15) Create industrial depression and financial panic, unemployment, hunger, shortage of food, use these events to control the masses and mobs, and use them to wipe out those who stand in the way.

16) Infiltrate Freemasonry which is to be used to conceal and further objectives.

17) Expound the value of systematic deception, use high sounding slogans and phrases, advocate lavish sounding promises to the masses even though they can’t be kept.

18) The art of street fighting is necessary to bring the population into subjection.

19) Use agents as provocateurs and advisers behind the scenes, and after wars use secret diplomacy talks to gain control.

20) Establish huge monopolies towards world government control.

21) Use high taxes and unfair competition to bring about economic ruin by controlling raw materials, organized agitation among the workers, and subsidizing competitors.

22) Build up armaments with police and soldiers who can protect and further the New World Order's interests.

23) Members and leaders of the one world government will be appointed by the director of the New World Order.

24) Infiltrate into all classes and levels of society and government for the purpose of teaching the youth in the schools theories and principles known to be false.

25) Create and use national and international laws to destroy civilization.

 
26) Use estrogens & femicals to drive males gay and the female population insane thereby insuring the destruction of the family, hence more governmental dependency.





Report Spam   Logged
Austin Heller
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1213



« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2011, 11:46:30 pm »

Quote
Don't Start a Trade War With China

by Rep. Ron Paul, MD

Well, hell!  That should tell you that he is all for free trade with China. What are you supporting this old goofball for again, Volitzer?  Seems like he is all for outsourcing to China.
Report Spam   Logged

For a longer term solution to corporations buying our elections, see:  http://www.movetoamend.org
Krista Davenport
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5018



« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2011, 10:59:09 pm »

Read all four Paul essays and you will see that he is not about helping you.  He is a free trader and doesn't care if your job gets shipped off to China if it's 'the will of the free market.'  That, plus the fact that he doesn't support the minimum wage means he wants you to work for 80 cents an hour if your job does come back.  Guys like him are a big part of the problem, they aren't anyone's cure.
Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2011, 02:10:51 pm »

He's had a long time since 2005, to get full on Globalist plan for America.

Now that he knows, he's not going to vote with the kleptocratic element of the Republican Party.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2011, 03:42:52 pm by Volitzer » Report Spam   Logged
Krista Davenport
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5018



« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2011, 06:31:46 pm »

He's a free trader, he's all four outsourcing and free trade, he is also not for the minimum wage or unemployment benefits.  That means Ron Paul would have you work for 80 cents an hour then starve and be homeless when your job is shipped to China.

But what do you care?  It's all about "the Fed," with you and the other Paultards, as if he could ever close it single-handedly anyway.
Report Spam   Logged
Volitzer
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 11110



« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2011, 03:48:30 pm »

Ron Paul will definitely reinstate tariffs.  All countries do, America should stop beign taken advantage of like this.  China has theirs on our goods yet we don't on theirs.  He knows this.

Currency is a factor but not the only factor.  He plans on addressing this as well.

He also knows about all the corporate tax havens in Aruba and the Cayman Islands too.

Funn I didn't see Obama do anything to reign in the FED, or do anything to balance trade with China, or to stop unethical legal corporate tax evasion.

Ron Paul and his supports do have plans.

Some of them come from the Money-Masters films.

I doubt Obama has ever seen the film.
Report Spam   Logged
Krista Davenport
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5018



« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2011, 11:25:43 pm »

Quote
Ron Paul will definitely reinstate tariffs.  All countries do, America should stop beign taken advantage of like this.  China has theirs on our goods yet we don't on theirs.  He knows this.

Sure, Ron Paul is going to reinstate tariffs with China when I just posted links to four essays saying why he wouldn't do that!  Shocked

Read the essays, don't read things into Paul that aren't there.

Quote
Funn I didn't see Obama do anything to reign in the FED, or do anything to balance trade with China, or to stop unethical legal corporate tax evasion.

Shows how you aren't paying attention!

U.S. Imposes Tariffs on Chinese Steel Imports




http://chicagoist.com/2009/12/31/us_imposes_tariffs_on_chinese_steel.php

http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2010/11/17/gm-ipo-auto-bailout-saved-more-than-1-million-jobs-study-says/
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy