Atlantis Online
April 19, 2024, 08:22:59 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Scientists Confirm Historic Massive Flood in Climate Change
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20060228/
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Is Clarence Thomas's Humble Georgia Museum a Huge Ethics Issue?

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Clarence Thomas's Humble Georgia Museum a Huge Ethics Issue?  (Read 85 times)
0 Members and 38 Guests are viewing this topic.
Adrienne
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2428



« on: June 25, 2011, 06:57:43 pm »

ARTINFO

The online authority for art news and gallery reviews

Is Clarence Thomas's Humble Georgia Museum a Huge Ethics Issue?
Posted: 06/25/11 03:04 AM ET


A quaint historical museum in Pin Point, Georgia, that is set to open this fall has become the target of an exhaustive ethics examination by the New York Times. Why would the Times devote almost 3,000 words to a community heritage museum? Pin Point, as it turns out, is also the birthplace of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and it was Thomas who introduced Pin Point residents to his friend Harlan Crow, a Dallas real-estate tycoon and major conservative donor, who would ultimately fund the museum. According to some legal analysts, Thomas's role in Crow's decision to donate may have troubling ethical implications.



Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas / Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Pin Point lies along the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor designated by Congress, a passage of coastal fishing towns settled by the descendants of slaves. Algernon Varn, whose father ran the fishing cannery there, long hoped to save the site from development, but it wasn't until he bumped into Thomas, who was in town promoting his memoir, that the project began to move forward. Thomas introduced Varn to Crow, a longtime friend. Through an exhaustive paper trail review, the Times confirmed that Crow is the anonymous donor behind the $1.3 million restoration of the property and forthcoming museum project. Varn was told to keep Crow's identity anonymous.

The question of ethics violations comes down to whether Thomas misused "the prestige of office" to persuade Crow to take on the project, said Raymond J. McKoski, a retired state judge in Illinois. (Supreme Court justices are not explicitly bound to the complex code of conduct for federal judges because it is enforced by lower ranking judges. That's right, they are literally above the law -- though the Times points to several justices who said they adhere to it regardless.) "Some of it depends on the conversations that took place," McKoski told the Times of the ethical quandary. "Who brought up the idea? How willing was Mr. Crow to do it? What exact questions were asked by Justice Thomas?"

This isn't the first time Crow has donated to projects directly or indirectly honoring Thomas. (According to the federal ethics code, judges are not supposed to know who makes a donation in their honor.) The Times gathers an exhaustive list of shady gifts and donations, including Mr. Crow's financing of a Savannah library dedicated to Justice Thomas and his gift of a bible that once belonged to Frederick Douglass. Thomas also received a $15,000 bust of Abraham Lincoln from a group affiliated with Crow.

So, after all this commotion, what will the museum actually look like? The modest, almost astonishingly unglamorous-sounding Pin Point Heritage Museum will be housed in the A.S. Varn & Son Factory, a former seafood cannery that was the economic backbone of Pin Point -- and where Thomas's mother worked as a crab picker -- until it closed in 1985.

Each structure on the property -- including the oyster factory, can storage building, and marshfront dock -- will be stabilized and restored. A patio area will host live demonstrations of crabbing, canning, and shrimp net making. Inside, 3,000 square feet of exhibition space -- modest by museum standards -- will house educational exhibits, live demonstrations, interactive displays, and a 30-minute documentary film, all devoted to the generations of residents in Pin Point.

-ARTINFO, ARTINFO

More of Today's News from ARTINFO:
The Purloined Warhol?: Missing $30 Million Farrah Fawcett Portrait Discovered on Ryan O'Neal's Wall... On His Reality Show
"Most of the Art World Wants Me to Commit Suicide": Photographer Nan Goldin on Her New Work and the Imposition of Being a Living Artist
The Mysteries of Maya Civilization Are Unveiled at Paris's Musée du Quai Branly
Why the Brooklyn Museum's Cancellation of "Art in the Streets" Paints a Dire Picture for New York
Reclusive Art Maven Huguette Clark Emerges From the Shadows in Death, Finally Revealing Her Renoirs and Monets to the Public


Like what you see? Sign up for ARTINFO's daily newsletter to get the latest on the market, emerging artists, auctions, galleries, museums, and more.
 

Follow ARTINFO on Twitter: www.twitter.com/artinfodotcom
Report Spam   Logged

"In a monarchy, the king is law, in a democracy, the law is king."
-Thomas Paine

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Adrienne
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2428



« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2011, 06:59:10 pm »

Republican­s just want to stuff the Supreme Court with "their" people. Anyone with half a brain working and watching Thomas ' nomination knew that he was not a reliable candidate. And in the years he has been on the bench he has proven this over and over again.(tha­nks for the list)

15 current senators voted against Thomas' nomination­­:
Chris Dodd (D-Connect­­icut)
Joe Lieberman (I-Connect­­icut)
Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii)
Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii)
Tom Harkin (D-Iowa)
Barbara Mikulski (D-Marylan­­d)
John Kerry (D-Massach­­usetts)
Carl Levin (D-Michiga­­n)
Max Baucus (D-Montana­­)
Harry Reid (D-Nevada)
Frank Lautenberg (D-New Jersey)
Jeff Bingaman (D-New Mexico)
Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont­­)
Jay Rockefelle­­r (D-...
Report Spam   Logged

"In a monarchy, the king is law, in a democracy, the law is king."
-Thomas Paine
Adrienne
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2428



« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2011, 07:00:04 pm »

Clarence Thomas IS an ethics issue.

Clarence Thomas must resign.
After watching Rachels show last night, this person has received gifts and compensati­on from one of the most wealthy men in the South.He spends a great deal of time with this mans on vacations in
luxurious places. More, the million aire has supported Ginny Thomas , Thomas' wife in her Tea Party committee .
He then goes back to his job and supports , e very time, decisions in favor of this man and his companies.
Just because Thomas is black is no reason for him to get away with something that a white Justice would be disbarred for.This has happened too many times to be overlooked­. It is against the law.
Report Spam   Logged

"In a monarchy, the king is law, in a democracy, the law is king."
-Thomas Paine
Adrienne
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2428



« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2011, 07:00:57 pm »

As usual, The Democrats were correct and the Republican­s WRONG.   Clarence and Ginny prove the case against him and her.
Report Spam   Logged

"In a monarchy, the king is law, in a democracy, the law is king."
-Thomas Paine
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy