Conspiracy: Egypt and Zahi Hawass Covering Up Hall of Records Discovery

[Bey]

Conspiracy: Egypt and Zahi Hawass Covering Up Hall of Records Discovery

There have been many discussions going on recently about a conspiracy with the supposed discovery of one of the fabled Hall of Records in Egypt. Many researchers are claiming that both the Egyptian government and Zahi Hawass are covering up the discovery.

Rumors are circulating throughout the world recently with the supposed discovery of one of the legendary Hall of Records in Egypt.  The Egyptian government along with recently retired Zahi Hawass who ran the Egyptian Antiquities Department have adamantly denied these claims saying that no such building or chamber has been found.  However, many researchers and even some archaeologists are saying that the chamber was indeed found but has been covered up due to the contents inside and what it would mean to both our understanding of history and Ancient Egypt’s history.

According to legend and the renowned psychic Edgar Cayce, the Hall of Records are composed of three chambers spread throughout the world that contain the missing history of the lost continent of Atlantis along with the missing history of the human race.  The three chambers are said to be located in Egypt (underneath the Sphinx’s paw), somewhere on the Yucatan Peninsula and one on the lost continent of Atlantis, which would be most likely sunken in the ocean depths still.  Each chamber is thought to contain the history of the lost continent of Atlantis along with information on any of the surviving inhabitants of the legendary island.  It was Cayce’s claim that there were small groups of survivors that managed to escape the destruction of Atlantis and it was these Atlanteans that brought civilization to both Egypt and Mexico.  Cayce claimed that all of this information would be housed in these Hall of Records and would detail both the history before the destruction of Atlantis and the demise too.


So, why would Egypt hide the Hall of Records?  Obviously, the main reason would be the knowledge that the Egyptians did not develop civilization independently but instead were taught the concepts of it.  This change in thinking would make the ancient Egyptian culture not as sophisicated as originally thought and all of their achievements would be questioned.   Buildings such as the Great Pyramid and Abu Simbel would have to be questioned as to who was really responsible for the technology and ideas behind the building of them.  Even the Sphinx would have to be questioned.

Where is the evidence for the finding of the Hall of Records in Egypt?  The first piece of evidence was found more than twenty years ago and was a ground penetrating radar scan that revealed a strange anomaly underneath one of the Spinx’s paws.  The scan revealed what appeared to be a small chamber exactly in the location that Edgar Cayce had predicted the Hall of Records was to be found.  The second piece of evidence and the most important are a network of caves and tunnels that run all around the Giza plateau.  When these caves and tunnels were first discovered, both the Egyptian government and Zahi Hawass denied the existence of them.  The caves run underneath at least two of the three large pyramids on the Giza plateau and run very close to right beneath the Sphinx.  It is this cave chamber that runs very close to the Sphinx that the secret Hall of Records was located.  The Hall was located behind about 5 feet of rock that separated the end of the cave chamber to the entrance of the Hall of Records.  According to some sources, archaeologists were able to drill through and clear this 5 feet of rock and have gained access to the hall.  But other sources are saying that once the archaeologists realized what they had found, they further sealed the cave chamber thereby hiding the discovery.

So, has the Hall of Records really been discovered?  And, if so, will we ever hear about the contents of what the chamber had inside it?  My guess is that the Egyptian government will do everything they can to hide this discovery and unless they are forced to disclose, we will never get confirmation.  Hopefully, I will be proven wrong.

For more information on the cave system please visit this site:  http://www.viewzone.com/pyramidcavesx.html

Read more: http://socyberty.com/social-sciences/conspiracy-egypt-and-zahi-hawass-covering-up-hall-of-records-discovery/#ixzz1MSjyPKjK

[Bey]

When scientific and geological experts find evidence that runs contrary to long–accepted beliefs, they find themselves banned from further investigations.

One such disagreement resulted in the banning from Giza, of Boston University geologist, Dr Robert Schoch. His team’s stunning scientific survey conservatively dated the Sphinx far beyond the Dynastic times, to an absolute latest date of 4,500 BCE, when the last heavy rain period ended, but the monument’s severe rain weathering suggested it was more likely to be thousands of years older still.

The first person to point out what caused this weathering had been French mathematician R A Schwaller who, between 1937 and 1952, had been studying advanced mathematics in ancient Egypt. Schoch, RM & West, J A. Redating the Great Sphinx of Giza, Egypt

As he was ‘only a mathematician’, Egyptologists ‘knew better’ and chose to ignore his observations. When Schoch came along, they had to take notice of a geologist, but to minimise the amount of evidence he could use to support his argument, they refused him a licence to investigate further. Numerous other licences have been refused or revoked by the Supreme Council of Antiquities, which fears that the orthodox history of ancient Egypt will be turned upon its head.

Dr. Schoch’s geological evidence was not all that fell foul of the wrath of Dr Hawass and his Supreme Council. In 1991, seismic readings were taken by geophysicist Dr Dobecki, of what appeared to be a regularly–shaped man–made chamber, beneath the paws of the Sphinx. Dobecki, T & Schoch, R. “Seismic Investigation in the Vicinity of the Great Sphinx of Giza, Egypt ” The authorities used a weak excuse to end the work, claiming that vibration, caused by drilling bore holes into the ground — essential for their tests — was endangering the structure, a structure which had managed to survive numerous earthquakes over thousands of years without coming to harm. A second team, from the University of Florida and the Schor Foundation, carried out further tests, which discovered at least nine more chambers or tunnels, all housing metal contents. Hancock, G & Bauval, R. The Message of the Sphinx This team also has not been allowed to continue the research.

The authorities said that the ban was because of ‘irregularities’. They then explained that the reason for the seismic scans, was not to look for the legendary Hall of Records beneath the Sphinx, as had been supposed, but to find out whether the ground was safe for tourists to walk on. The excuse sounds barely plausible and arouses speculation that the Supreme Council of Antiquities wants to take advantage of the technology and skills of foreign investigators to find out if there is something under the Sphinx, but doesn’t want anyone foreign to know what it is that they found.

If one accepts the findings of these reputable researchers, this subterranean discovery is especially significant to the story of the Egyptian religious revolution. Other underground chambers have been found some 200 metres from the Sphinx. Dr Hawass states that an upper chamber, 10 metres below the surface, contained the remains of several aristocrats and that it is dated to around 500 BCE; the lower chamber is flooded, with a raised central stone island, which is reminiscent of the Osireion temple at Abydos, a structure which some believe to be, possibly, the oldest structure in Egypt. In this lower water–filled chamber is a shaft, which seems to travel in the direction of the nearby Sphinx. This shaft is unusual as it narrows to a tiny bore, requiring a fibre–optic camera to probe it. So far no public announcement has been made about whether this work has been done, or what might have been found.

Dr Zahi Hawass is now retired, but there is no reason to expect his successor will want the truth to be revealed. It is not in the interests of the Egyptians to reveal that the builders of these monuments were not Egyptian, or even Arabs, no matter who they might have been. It all becomes just another small part of The Greatest Lie Ever Told.

WH Uffington
http://www.thegreatestlieevertold.co.uk