Atlantis Online
October 14, 2019, 03:44:36 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: FARMING FROM 6,000 YEARS AGO
http://www.thisislincolnshire.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=156622&command=displayContent&sourceNode=156618&contentPK=18789712&folderPk=87030
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

2010 new proof ufo attack WTC september 11

Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 2010 new proof ufo attack WTC september 11  (Read 1118 times)
Delorean Bryson
Full Member
***
Posts: 38


« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2010, 07:17:32 pm »

Guilliani Admits There Were Fires Over 2000 Degrees Fahrenheit Underground At WTC On 9/11


He says it at the 2:31 mark

"There were fires beneath the ground of 2000 degrees Fahrenheit and MORE" -- R.G.

NIST:
"Normal building fires and hydrocarbon (e.g., jet fuel) fires generate temperatures up to about 1,100 degrees Celsius (2,000 degrees Fahrenheit). NIST reported maximum upper layer air temperatures of about 1,000 degrees Celsius (1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) in the WTC towers"
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

When the Government wanted the Towers built they assured the public if hit by planes they would NOT collapse:

"The Port Authority released a white paper in 1964 referencing the analysis done on the structure of the WTC.

"Salient points with regard to the structural design of The World Trade Center Towers" was the low-key title on the white paper in the Port Authority's files. Below the title were eleven numbered points on the structure, beginning with ..
1. The structural analysis carried out by the firm of Worthington Skilling Helle & Jackson is the most complete and detailed of any ever made for any building structure. The preliminary calculations alone cover 1,200 pages and involve over 100 detailed drawings." At the end of the three page document was the notation "MPL:fg" above the date "2-3-64" meaning that the white paper had been typed for Malcom P. Levy by his secretary, Florence Grainger, on February 3, 1964.

...halfway down the first page, the paper contained this astonishing statement:

"3. The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707-DC 8 )traveling 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage to the building and would not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact." page 131
http://www.amazon.com/City-Sky-World-Trade-Center/dp/0805074287/ref=ed_oe_h

When the towers the Government wanted built were hit by planes and collpased:

FEMA report:

"The WTC towers were the first structures outside of the military and the nuclear industries whose design considered the impact of a jet airliner, the Boeing 707. It was assumed in the 1960s design analysis for the WTC towers that an aircraft, lost in the fog and seeking to land at a nearby airport, like the B-25 Mitchell bomber that struck the Empire State Building on July 28, 1945, might strike a WTC tower while low on fuel and at landing speeds. However, in the September 11 events, the Boeing 767-200ER aircraft that hit both towers were considerably larger with significantly higher weight, or mass, and traveling at substantially higher speeds. page 17/21
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch1.pdf

When the Government wanted the towers built they bragged about the study done showing them to be safe in case a plane hit:

"1. The structural analysis carried out by the firm of Worthington Skilling Helle & Jackson is the most complete and detailed of any ever made for any building structure. The preliminary calculations alone cover 1,200 pages and involve over 100 detailed drawings." At the end of the three page document was the notation "MPL:fg" above the date "2-3-64" meaning that the white paper had been typed for Malcom P. Levy by his secretary, Florence Grainger, on February 3, 1964."

"3. The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707-DC 8)traveling 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage to the building and would not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact." page 131
http://www.amazon.com/City-Sky-World-Trade-Center/dp/0805074287/ref=ed_oe_h

When Planes hit and they were not safe but collapsed the Government could not find this study:

"However, NIST investigators were unable to locate any documentation of the criteria and method used in the impact analysis and, therefore, were unable to verify the assertion that “… such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building.…”
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Gov Hacks Vs Gov Hacks:

"Lehman recalled asking Bush about the news reports that checks for thousands of dollars written by the wife of Prince Bandar, the Saudi ambassador in Washington, might have been funneled to two of the hijackers in San Diego. "He dodged the questions," said Lehman." page 344
http://www.amazon.com/Commission-Uncensored-History-11-Investigation/dp/0446580759/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0

"I answered every question they asked" --G Bush after meeting with 9-11 Commission (1:55 mark of following video)


What is the Commission's mandate?

* The Commission's mandate is to provide a “full and complete accounting” of the attacks of September 11, 2001
http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/about/faq.htm#q1

These are the folks telling me "evil doers" hate me because I am so free. Why wouldn't I believe that?
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy