You actually used that lame explanation
what lame explanation? you should know by now that evolutionists look at skeletons and bones and simply apply assumption or conjecture to to explain them. if you have read ann gibbons' book, you would know how minute the bones are with which anthropologists use as jumping off spots fo rtheir huge theories.
They haven't been observed in real life is because they are extincted
{extinct not 'extincted'} yes i am well aware of the double standard that evolutionists set for themselves to get around their own rules.
Yes you can observe the evolutionary process by studying old bones. That's how it is done. So clearly you have no idea what you are talking about.
no you can't because it is all assumption and the dating systems are faulty. i assure you i most certainly do know what i am talking about but i see you do not. what stele? don't even recall reading it.
your blind faith in evolution and evolutionists just shows you are no different from christians except for the object of your beliefs.
It would appear Robert, that archaeologist feels he is totally in the know beyond all the scientists who have given us what they've learned in all the different fields, so I for one, will leave him to his delusions. He calls himself archaeologist but decries what that subject teaches
such stupidity means i won't respond to your post and hinduismis not the oldest religion, in fact no one knows where the eastern indian originated from and given the fact that worship of God went back to adam and eve it is not hard to see how wrong you arer.
Your right Qoais, without science, free-thinking and open inquiry I think we would be still in the dark ages.
the same old same old. you evolutionists need to get new scripts. but since you went to the personal attack it is not hard to see you have nothing to refute the truth. evolution does not exist in any form and all secular scientists are wrong.