Atlantis Online
June 05, 2020, 11:21:33 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Ancient Crash, Epic Wave
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/11/14/healthscience/web.1114meteor.php?page=1

 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Darwin May Have Been WRONG, New Study Argues

Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Darwin May Have Been WRONG, New Study Argues  (Read 605 times)
Robert0326
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1156



« Reply #15 on: September 06, 2010, 09:14:35 am »

You still didn't answer my question Archeologist.  If these are not the ancestors of man, what exactly are they?


Toumai - Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Kenyanthropus - Kenyanthropus platyops
Australopithecus afarensis
Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus anamensis
Australopithecus garhi
Australopithecus aethiopicus
Australopithecus boisei
Australopithecus robustus
Homo habilis
Homo rudolfensis
Homo ergaster
Homo erectus
Homo neanderthalensis
Homo sapiens
Homo habilis
Homo rudolfensis
Homo ergaster
Homo erectus
Homo neanderthalensis
Homo sapiens

The Tel Dan Stele mentions the house of David.  Big deal

The Merenpthah Stele mentions Israel and Canaan, however, is brief, and a large part of the stele concerns Merneptah's campaign against the Libyans.  Again... Big deal.


Report Spam   Logged

Blasphemy is a victimless crime.
"The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the Supreme Being as His father, in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter."     Letter to John Adams, April 11, 1823 -Thomas Jefferson
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy