Atlantis Online
April 19, 2024, 08:30:19 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Towering Ancient Tsunami Devastated the Mediterranean
http://www.livescience.com/environment/061130_ancient_tsunami.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Darwin May Have Been WRONG, New Study Argues

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Darwin May Have Been WRONG, New Study Argues  (Read 1712 times)
0 Members and 108 Guests are viewing this topic.
archaeologist
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136


« on: August 29, 2010, 01:01:54 am »

Quote
it means that science isn't as rigid and ideological as religion is

it means that secular science does not know what the truth is, for it is the blind leading the blind, and it blows with the whims of those running it. you cannot trust secular science for it is looking for the wrong answers in the wrong places.

At least the Bible gives the correct answers and it is found in the correct place.

Quote
the Bible was not meant to be either a science book or a history lesson.

The Bible does record literal history and provides the origins of all people, the earth and the universe. It also records the history of the Israelite people. Albright said:

Quote
Hebrew national tradition excels all others in its clear picture of tribal and family origins. In Egypt and Babylonia, in Asyria, and Pheonicia, in Greece and ARome, we look in vain for anything comparable. There is nothing like it in the traditions of the GErmanic peoples. Neither India nor China can produce anything sinilar...

Quote
In contrast with these other peoples the Israelites preserved an unusually clear picture of simple beginnings, of complex migrations, and of extreme vicissitudes...

{both quotes are found on page 1 of his bookThe Biblical Period from Abraham to Ezra.}

as for science, it does NOT produce what the secular scientists considers science but then the secular scientist makes things up to provide an alternative to the Biblical record. Something they cannot verify nor ever prove true.

Quote
If you ask a evolutionary biologist how it all begin, chances are that he or she will say that they don't know.  And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.  That is why they continue to learn and change with they thought they knew when they make a new discovery

Actually there is something wrong with that for we already know how it all began and the evolutionist is wasting time, money and energy following a lie. those things would be better spent helping the less fortunate.

they keep changing their thoery because they are finding out they cannot prove one iota of it. Origins did not happen the way evolutionists want and they are stuck. they keep changing it to look more and more like creation.

Quote
Unlike people like you archeologist who would rather bury your heads in the bible and put your hands over your ears going...  LALALALALALALA i CAN'T HEAR YOU! LALALALALA

actually i do not do that. secular science doesn't have the truth and all their work is meaningless. One does NOT change from the truth regardless of what secular scientists or science says. They are not an authority nor the final determiner of what took place in the begining and were NOT there so all their experiments are a waste.
Report Spam   Logged

Dever is wrong, archaeology is not an unedited glimpse into the past.


Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy