Atlantis Online
April 16, 2024, 03:55:25 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Plato's Atlantis: Fact, Fiction or Prophecy?
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=CarolAnn_Bailey-Lloyd
http://www.underwaterarchaeology.com/atlantis-2.htm
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Pre-history rewritten as new human discovered

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Pre-history rewritten as new human discovered  (Read 289 times)
0 Members and 76 Guests are viewing this topic.
Shonnon
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 4545



« on: May 24, 2010, 03:24:55 am »

Pre-history rewritten as new human discovered

Thursday, 25 March 2010 David Mark
ABC
Scientists in Germany have discovered a new human species that lived in Siberia around 30,000 to 50,000 years ago.

The evidence changes the picture of pre-human habitation on Earth.

The species lived at the same time as modern humans and Neanderthals and shared a common ancestor with them.

Scientists found the fossilised remnants of a tiny finger bone that probably belonged to a small child.

Dr Johannes Krause of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Germany is the author of a paper on the finding which has been published in Nature.

He says the fossil was like nothing he had seen before.

"I did several analyses to make sure that this DNA is authentic, that this DNA is really old and that this DNA is what had seemed to be a new hominine lineage," he says.

"A new discovery, different from human DNA and different from Neanderthal DNA, for example."

His colleague and co-author, Professor Svante Paavo, was not initially convinced.

"It was of course absolutely amazing and I first really didn't believe him. I thought he was pulling my leg," he says.

The discovery crucially suggests the species were living at the same time and in the same place as modern humans and Neanderthals.

The deputy director of the INST at the University of Adelaide, Dr Jeremy Austin, says it is a very significant find.
Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Shonnon
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 4545



« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2010, 03:25:21 am »

"They've found this hominine lineage. It's not a modern human. It's not a Neanderthal. It's not a chimpanzee. It's something sort of halfway in between, at a time period when no-one thought that these sort of ancestral human forms were still alive," says Austin.
Co-existing species

Paavo says the new species shared a common ancestor with Neanderthals and modern humans. The common ancestor left Africa about 1 million years ago.

"Maybe it is oversimplification to think about particular migrations out of Africa," he says.

"There might have been more or less continuous flow, and the picture that's going to emerge in the next years might be a much more complex one."

It was only a few years ago that the 'Hobbit of Flores' was discovered and proclaimed a new species.

Austin says with the discovery of this new human in Siberia, scientists are adjusting to the possibility that four species were living at the same time when previously it was thought there were only two.

"If all this paper does is say there's a whole pile of diversity out there, essentially there's more human species we don't know about, then that's a really important finding."

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2010/03/25/2855631.htm?topic=
Report Spam   Logged
Shonnon
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 4545



« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2010, 03:25:49 am »



Participants of an archaeological conference gather inside Denisova cave, Siberia (Johannes Krause)
Report Spam   Logged
archaeologist
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136


« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2010, 06:06:23 am »

how can you re-write 'pre-history' when pre-history means  before anything was written down? there is nothing to confirm or contradict that which was already accepted and there is nothing to confirm or deny that which is correcting the old ideas.

Quote
I did several analyses to make sure that this DNA is authentic, that this DNA is really old and that this DNA is what had seemed to be a new hominine lineage," he says.

it is extremely difficult to extract uncorrupted dna so how does this guy think he has a new species? he is probably studying a contaminated piece of evidence or just making a mountain (species) out of a molehill (lone finger)

it is amazing how many 'new speces' are discovered lately yet not one piece of any skeleton can confirm these conclusions. it is all speculation based upon biased examination and unobjective equipment whose results are interpretated by biased people.

so i would think that this 'new' species is just as human as anyone living today.

Quote
If all this paper does is say there's a whole pile of diversity out there, essentially there's more human species we don't know about, then that's a really important finding."

there is no 'diversity out there', all descended from adam and there is only one human race not 4, what we have is the fanciful imaginative speculation by those who do not believe and do not want to believe the Bible.
Report Spam   Logged

Dever is wrong, archaeology is not an unedited glimpse into the past.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy