Atlantis Online
April 20, 2024, 10:32:23 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: USA showered by a watery comet ~11,000 years ago, ending the Golden Age of man in America
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20050926/mammoth_02.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

The Religion of the Ancient Celts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Religion of the Ancient Celts  (Read 2316 times)
0 Members and 178 Guests are viewing this topic.
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #30 on: April 22, 2010, 11:48:25 am »

harmful customs of the past, merging pagan festivals in its own, founding churches on the sites of the old cult, dedicating sacred wells to a saint. A saint would visit the tomb of a pagan to hear an old epic rehearsed, or would call up pagan heroes from hell and give them a place in paradise. Other saints recall dead heroes from the Land of the Blessed, and learn the nature of that wonderland and the heroic deeds

"Of the old days, which seem to be
Much older than any history
That is written in any book."

Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #31 on: April 22, 2010, 11:48:37 am »

Reading such narratives, we gain a lesson in the fine spirit of Christian tolerance and Christian sympathy.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Footnotes
2:1 Some writers saw in the bardic poetry a Druidic-esoteric system and traces of a cult practised secretly by the bards--the "Neo-Druidic heresy"; see Davies, Myth. of the Brit. Druids, 1809; Herbert, The Neo-Druidic Heresy, 1838. Several French writers saw in "Druidism" a monotheistic faith, veiled under polytheism.

2:2 Livy, v. 46; Cæsar, vi. 16; Dion. Hal. vii. 70; Arrian, Cyneg. xxxv. 1.

4:1 Cæsar, vi. 15, cf. v. 12, "having waged war, remained there and cultivated the lands."

4:2 Cf. Pliny, HN xvii. 7, xviii. 18 on the wheeled ploughs and agricultural methods of Gauls and Britons. Cf. also Strabo, iv. l. 2, iv. 5. 5; Girald. Camb. Top. Hib. i. 4, Descr. Camb. i. 8; Joyce, SH ii 264
Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #32 on: April 22, 2010, 11:48:52 am »

p. 8

CHAPTER II.
THE CELTIC PEOPLE.
SCRUTINY reveals the fact that Celtic-speaking peoples are of differing types--short and dark as well as tall and fairer Highlanders or Welshmen, short, broad-headed Bretons, various types of Irishmen. Men with Norse names and Norse aspect "have the Gaelic." But all alike have the same character and temperament, a striking witness to the influence which the character as well as the language of the Celts, whoever they were, made on all with whom they mingled. Ethnologically there may not be a Celtic race, but something was handed down from the days of comparative Celtic purity which welded different social elements into a common type, found often where no Celtic tongue is now spoken. It emerges where we least expect it, and the stolid Anglo-Saxon may suddenly awaken to something in himself due to a forgotten Celtic strain in his ancestry.

Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #33 on: April 22, 2010, 11:49:06 am »

Two main theories of Celtic origins now hold the field:

(1) The Celts are identified with the progenitors of the short, brachycephalic "Alpine race" of Central Europe, existing there in Neolithic times, after their migrations from Africa and Asia. The type is found among the Slavs, in parts of Germany and Scandinavia, and in modern France in the region of Cæsar's "Celtæ," among the Auvergnats, the Bretons, and in Lozère and Jura. Representatives. of the type have been a

p. 9

Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #34 on: April 22, 2010, 11:49:14 am »

found in Belgian and French Neolithic graves. 1 Professor Sergi calls this the "Eurasiatic race," and, contrary to general opinion, identifies it with the Aryans, a savage people, inferior to the dolichocephalic Mediterranean race, whose language they Aryanised. 2 Professor Keane thinks that they were themselves an Aryanised folk before reaching Europe, who in turn gave their acquired Celtic and Slavic speech to the preceding masses. Later came the Belgæ, Aryans, who acquired the Celtic speech of the people they conquered. 3

Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #35 on: April 22, 2010, 11:49:22 am »

Broca assumed that the dark, brachycephalic people whom he identified with Cæsar's "Celtæ," differed from the Belgæ, were conquered by them, and acquired the language of their conquerors, hence wrongly called Celtic by philologists. The Belgæ were tall and fair, and overran Gaul, except Aquitaine, mixing generally with the Celtæ, who in Cæsar's time had thus an infusion of Belgic blood. 4 But before this conquest, the Celtæ had already mingled with the aboriginal dolichocephalic folk of Gaul, Iberians, or Mediterraneans of Professor Sergi. The latter had apparently remained comparatively pure from admixture in Aquitaine, and are probably the Aquitani of Cæsar. 5

Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #36 on: April 22, 2010, 11:49:30 am »

But were the short, brachycephalic, folk Celts? Cæsar says the people who call themselves "Celtæ" were called Gauls by the Romans, and Gauls, according to classical writers, were tall and fair. 6 Hence the Celtæ were not a short, dark race,







p. 10

Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #37 on: April 22, 2010, 11:49:39 am »

and Cæsar himself says that Gauls (including Celtæ) looked with contempt on the short Romans. 1 Strabo also says that Celtæ and Belgæ had the same Gaulish appearance, i.e. tall and fair. Cæsar's statement that Aquitani, Galli, and Belgæ differ in language, institutions, and laws is vague and unsupported by evidence, and may mean as to language no more than a difference in dialects. This is also suggested by Strabo's words, Celtæ and Belgæ "differ a little" in language. 2 No classical writer describes the Celts as short and dark, but the reverse. Short, dark people would have been called
Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #38 on: April 22, 2010, 11:49:57 am »

Iberians, without respect to skulls. Classical observers were not craniologists. The short, brachycephalic type is now prominent in France, because it has always been so, eliminating the tall, fair Celtic type. Conquering Celts, fewer in number than the broad and narrow-headed aborigines, intermarried or made less lasting alliances with them. In course of time the type of the more numerous race was bound to prevail. Even in Cæsar's day the latter probably outnumbered the tall and fair Celts, who had, however, Celticised them. But classical writers, who knew the true Celt as tall and fair, saw that type only, just as
Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #39 on: April 22, 2010, 11:50:02 am »

every one, on first visiting France or Germany, sees his generalised type of Frenchman or German everywhere. Later, he modifies his opinion, but this the classical observers did not do. Cæsar's campaigns must have drained Gaul of many tall and fair Celts. This, with the tendency of dark types to outnumber fair types in South and Central Europe, may help to explain the growing prominence of the dark type, though the tall, fair type is far from uncommon. 3
Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #40 on: April 22, 2010, 11:50:14 am »

(2) The second theory, already anticipated, sees in Gauls and Belgæ a tall, fair Celtic folk, speaking a Celtic language,




p. 11

and belonging to the race which stretched from Ireland to Asia Minor, from North Germany to the Po, and were masters of Teutonic tribes till they were driven by them from the region between Elbe and Rhine. 1 Some Belgic tribes claimed a Germanic ancestry, 2 but "German" was a word seldom used with
Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #41 on: April 22, 2010, 11:50:30 am »

precision, and in this case may not mean Teutonic. The fair hair of this people has made many suppose that they were akin to the Teutons. But fairness is relative, and the dark Romans may have called brown hair fair, while they occasionally distinguished between the "fair" Gauls and fairer Germans. Their institutions and their religions (pace Professor Rhŷs) differed, and though they were so long in contact the names of their gods and priests are unlike. 3 Their languages, again, though of "Aryan" stock, differ
Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #42 on: April 22, 2010, 11:50:35 am »

more from each other than does Celtic from Italic, pointing to a long period of Italo-Celtic unity, before Italiotes and Celts separated, and Celts came in contact with Teutons. 4 The typical German differs in mental and moral qualities from the typical Celt. Contrast an east country Scot, descendant of Teutonic stock, with a West Highlander, and the difference leaps to the eyes. Celts and Germans of history differ, then, in relative fairness, character, religion, and language.
Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #43 on: April 22, 2010, 11:50:49 am »

The tall, blonde Teutonic type of the Row graves is dolichocephalic. Was the Celtic type (assuming that Broca's "Celts" were not true Celts) dolicho or brachy? Broca thinks the Belgæ or "Kymri" were dolichocephalic, but all must agree with him that the skulls are too few to generalise from. Celtic iron-age skulls in Britain are dolichocephalic, perhaps a





p. 12

Report Spam   Logged
Rachel Dearth
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Posts: 4464



« Reply #44 on: April 22, 2010, 11:50:57 am »

recrudescence of the aboriginal type. Broca's "Kymric" skulls are mesocephalic; this he attributes to crossing with the short round-heads. The evidence is too scanty for generalisation, while the Walloons, perhaps descendants of the Belgæ, have a high index, and some Gauls of classical art are broad-headed. 1

Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy