Atlantis Online
October 16, 2019, 01:47:47 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Site provides evidence for ancient comet explosion
http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/nationworld/story/173177.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Te Pito Te Henua, Or Easter Island

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 42   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Te Pito Te Henua, Or Easter Island  (Read 1446 times)
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« on: February 26, 2010, 01:26:25 pm »

Te Pito Te Henua, Or Easter Island
by William J. Thomson
[1891]


Report Spam   Logged

Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2010, 01:26:35 pm »

Easter Island is a surreal landscape, with its giant stone heads and undeciphered rongo-rongo script--the only writing system invented in the Pacific islands. This account of an expedition to Easter Island in the late nineteenth century will have modern social scientists (as well as indigenous rights activists) gritting their teeth. The adventurers engage in tomb-raiding from one end of Easter Island to the other, shredding priceless archeological contexts without remorse. The text describes bones turning into dust on touch; they loot gravesites, and tear up ruins of villages. When one of the Easter Islanders complains that they are taking his ancestors' remains, they offer him two dollars for the bones.

Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2010, 01:26:44 pm »

The one redeeming feature of this expedition was the desperate attempt to prompt one of the last remaining indigenous bards to relate the rongo-rongo texts and other legends. The circumstances of this recital are greatly suspect. The informant had been indoctrinated by missionaries that reciting from the tablets was a mortal sin. After the expedition attempted to bribe the informant, he fled into the hinterlands. A rainstorm forced him to return to his house. On the last evening before the expedition set sail, they cornered him in his hut and got him drunk, after convincing him that reciting from a photograph was not the same as reciting from the original tablet. To further confuse matters, at one point they switched photographs on him mid-recital...

Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2010, 01:27:16 pm »

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION.
UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM.
TE PITO TE HENUA, OR EASTER ISLAND
BY
WILLIAM J. THOMSON,
Paymaster, U. S. Navy.
From the Report of the National Museum, 1888-'89, pages 447-552
(with plates XII-LX).
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.
1891.
scanned at sacred-texts.com, September 2002. J. B. Hare, redactor
Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2010, 01:27:36 pm »

Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2010, 01:27:53 pm »

MAP OF EASTER ISLAND

 

p. 447

Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2010, 01:28:08 pm »

TE PITO TE HENUA, OR EASTER ISLAND.
By Paymaster WILLIAM J. THOMPSON, U. S. Navy.

THE DISCOVERY OF EASTER ISLAND.
The honor of the discovery of Easter Island is contested by several of the earlier voyagers in the Pacific. Spanish writers claim that the island was sighted by Mendana in 1566, but the account is by no means authenticated, and the records preserved are not sufficiently accurate to determine the exact track sailed over by that ancient mariner. Captain Davis is credited by Capt. William Dampier with being the first to sight the island, and Lionel Wafer, who cruised with that bold navigator, on board of the Batchelor's Delight, gives the following account of the discovery in the year 1687:

Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2010, 01:28:17 pm »

Bound to the southward, in latitude 12 degrees 30 minutes and about 150 leagues off the coast, experienced a shock of earthquake, that was afterwards found to correspond with the destruction of Callao by earthquake. Having recovered from our fright we kept on to the southward. We steered south-and-by-east-half-easterly, until we came to latitude 27 degrees 20 minutes south, when about two hours before day we fell in with a small low, sandy island and heard a great roaring noise, like that of the sea beating upon the shore, right ahead of the ship. Whereupon the sailors, fearing to fall foul upon the shore before day, desired the captain to put the ship about, and to stand off until the day appeared; to which the captain gave his consent. So we plied off till day and then stood in again with the land, which proved to be a
Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2010, 01:28:25 pm »

small flat island, without any guard of rocks. We stood in within a quarter of a mile of the shore and could see it plainly, for it was a clear morning, not fogy or hazy. To the westward about 12 leagues, by judgment, we saw a range of high land, which we took to be islands, for there were several partitions in the prospect.

This land seemed to reach about 14 or 16 leagues in a range, and there came great flocks of fowls. I and many more of our men would have made this land and have gone ashore on it, but the captain would not permit us. The small island bears from Copiapó almost due east 500 leagues, and from the Galapagos, under the line, 600 leagues.

Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2010, 01:28:34 pm »

Unfortunately, none of the voyagers on board of the Batchelor's Delight were permitted to land upon this unknown island, nor is mention made in the narratives of monoliths or unusual structures that might have been observed from the short distance in which it is claimed they approached the shore. The apparent inaccuracy in the description of the appearance of the land may have been due, to the peculiar bearing of the vessel, but it gives foundation to the claim of Admiral Roggeveen,

p. 448

Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2010, 01:28:42 pm »

that Davis's island was not identical with the one discovered by him on April 7, 1722, and named Easter Island in commemoration of the day upon which the land was sighted. Roggeveen says:

When we approached nearer the land we saw distinctly from a short distance that the description of the sandy and low island did not accord in the least with our discovery. Furthermore, it could not be the same land which the aforesaid voyagers claim to have seen stretching 14 to 16 leagues in front of them, and near the highland which Dampier judged to be the coast-line of the unknown south. That Easter Island can not be the sandy island
Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2010, 01:28:52 pm »

described by Davis is clear, because that was small and low, while on the contrary Easter Island is high and towers above the sea, having also two elevations rising above the level part. It would not be possible to mistake, even at the dry season of the year, the grass and verdure that covers the hill-sides for barren sand. After the Dutch custom of the day, the admiral assembled the commanders of the three vessels composing his fleet--the Arend, the African Galley, and the Thienhoven--in council to pass formal resolutions claiming the discovery of the land. The proceedings of the assembly state that on Easter day land was sighted about 9 miles distant, of moderate height, and containing an area of about 6 Dutch miles. The weather being calm the vessels were not able to secure an anchorage near the land until the next day, The island was found to be destitute of trees, but with a fertile soil producing bananas, potatoes, and sugar-cane of extraordinary thickness. It was unanimously agreed that both from the difference in the location as well as the appearance of the land seen by Davis, the fact was established beyond doubt that the island just discovered could not be the same. These proceedings, being drawn up, were formally signed by Jacob Roggeveen, Jan Koster, Cornelius Bonman, and Roelof Rosendaal. After sailing from Easter Island the vessels spent a number of days in it search for the low sandy island described by Davis, but not with success.
Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #12 on: February 26, 2010, 01:29:00 pm »

The unreliable Behrens mentions in the "Two Years' Voyage" the discovery of Easter Island by Roggeveen on the day celebrated as the resurrection of the Lord (April 6, 1722), in latitude 27 degrees south and longitude 268 degrees west.

Capt. F. W. Beechey, R. N., commanding H. M. S. Blossom (November, 1825), referring to the discovery of Easter Island, finds the credit due to Davis, giving the following reasons for the conclusions drawn:

Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #13 on: February 26, 2010, 01:29:10 pm »

Had such an island been in existence, answering to the description of that seen by Davis, geographers would not have been long in reconciling their opinions on the subject of his discovery, as in all probability they would have waived their objections to its distance from Copiapó in consideration of its identity. The subject of the supposed discovery has been often discussed; and when the data are so unsatisfactory as to allow one party to choose the islands of Felix and Ambrose for the land in question, and the other Easter Island, two places nearly 1,600 miles apart, they are not likely to be speedily reconciled unless two islands exactly answering the description given by Davis, and situated in the proper latitude, shall be found.

Report Spam   Logged
Jennifer Murdoch
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5235



« Reply #14 on: February 26, 2010, 01:29:22 pm »

Without entering upon a question which presents so many difficulties, I shall merely observe that, considering the rapid current that exists in the vicinity of the Galapagos, and extends, though with diminished force, throughout the trade-wind, the error in Davis's reckoning is not more than might have happened to any dull sailing vessel circumstanced as he was. In a short run from Juan Fernandez to Easter Island, Behrens, who was with Roggeveen, was drifted 318 geographical miles to the westward of his supposed situation. H. M. S. Blossom in passing over the same ground experienced a set of 270 miles in the short space of 18 days. M. La Pérouse on his arrival at Sandwich Islands from Concepcion, touching at Easter Island on his way,

p. 449

Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 42   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy