Atlantis Online
March 28, 2024, 09:07:18 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Update About Cuba Underwater Megalithic Research
http://www.timstouse.com/EarthHistory/Atlantis/bimini.htm
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Conservative Bible Project

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Conservative Bible Project  (Read 304 times)
0 Members and 114 Guests are viewing this topic.
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« on: December 09, 2009, 04:00:19 am »

Conservative Bible Project



The Conservative Bible Project is a project to render God's word into modern English while removing liberal distortions. Beginners can pick any verse, type its citation into [1], click on "SHOW STRONG'S" at the top right to obtain the Greek, and then make an edit here for all to review.

Liberal bias has become the single biggest distortion in modern Bible translations. There are three sources of errors in conveying biblical meaning are, in increasing amount:

    * lack of precision in the original language, such as terms underdeveloped to convey new concepts introduced by Christ
    * lack of precision in modern language
    * translation bias in converting the original language to the modern one.

Experts in ancient languages are helpful in reducing the first type of error above, which is a vanishing source of error as scholarship advances understanding. English language linguists are helpful in reducing the second type of error, which also decreases due to an increasing vocabulary. But the third -- and largest -- source of translation error requires conservative principles to reduce and eliminate.[1]
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2009, 04:01:14 am »

As of 2009, there is no fully conservative translation of the Bible which satisfies the following ten guidelines:[2]

       1. Framework against Liberal Bias: providing a strong framework that enables a thought-for-thought translation without corruption by liberal bias
       2. Not Emasculated: avoiding unisex, "gender inclusive" language, and other feminist distortions; preserve many references to the unborn child (the NIV deletes these)
       3. Not Dumbed Down: not dumbing down the reading level, or diluting the intellectual force and logic of Christianity; the NIV is written at only the 7th grade level[3]
       4. Utilize Powerful Conservative Terms: using powerful new conservative terms to capture better the original intent;[4] Defective translations use the word "comrade" three times as often as "volunteer"; similarly, updating words that have a change in meaning, such as "word", "peace", and "miracle".
       5. Combat Harmful Addiction: combating addiction[5] by using modern terms for it, such as "****" rather than "cast lots";[6] using modern political terms, such as "register" rather than "enroll" for the census
       6. Accept the Logic of Hell: applying logic with its full force and effect, as in not denying or downplaying the very real existence of Hell or the Devil.
       7. Express Free Market Parables; explaining the numerous economic parables with their full free-market meaning
       8. Exclude Later-Inserted Inauthentic Passages: excluding the interpolated passages that liberals commonly put their own spin on, such as the adulteress story
       9. Credit Open-Mindedness of Disciples: crediting open-mindedness, often found in youngsters like the eyewitnesses Mark and John, the authors of two of the Gospels
      10. Prefer Conciseness over Liberal Wordiness: preferring conciseness to the liberal style of high word-to-substance ratio; avoid compound negatives and unnecessary ambiguities; prefer concise, consistent use of the word "Lord" rather than "Jehovah" or "Yahweh" or "Lord God."
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2009, 04:01:31 am »

Thus, a project has begun among members of Conservapedia to translate the Bible in accordance with these principles. The translated Bible can be found here.

Benefits include:

    * mastery of the Bible, which is priceless
    * mastery of the English language, which is valuable
    * thorough understanding of the differences in Bible translations, particularly the historically important King James Version
    * benefiting from activity that no public school would ever allow; a Conservative Bible could become a text for public school courses
    * liberals will oppose this effort, but they will have to read the Bible to criticize this, and that will open their minds
    * this project has a unifying effect on various Christian denominations, and serves as an important counterweight to liberal efforts to divide conservative candidates based on religion

How long would this project take? There are about 8000 verses in the New Testament. At a careful rate of translating about four verses an hour, it would take one person 2000 hours, or about one year working full time on the project.
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2009, 04:01:50 am »

  Possible Approaches

Here are possible approaches to creating a conservative Bible translation:

    * identify pro-liberal terms used in existing Bible translations, such as "government", and suggest more accurate substitutes
    * identify the omission of liberal terms for vices, such as "gambling", and identify where they should be used
    * identify conservative terms that are omitted from existing translations, and propose where they could improve the translation
    * identify terms that have lost their original meaning, such as "word" in the beginning of the Gospel of John, and suggest replacements, such as "truth"

An existing translation might license its version for improvement by the above approaches, much as several modern translations today are built on prior translations. Alternatively, a more ambitious approach would be to start anew from the best available ancient transcripts.

In stage one, the translation could focus on word improvement and thereby be described as a "conservative word-for-word" translation. If greater freedom in interpretation is then desired, then a "conservative thought-for-thought" version could be generated as a second stage.
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2009, 04:02:10 am »

  Building on the King James Version

In the United States and much of the world, the immensely popular and respected King James Version (KJV) is freely available and in the public domain. It could be used as the baseline for developing a conservative translation without requiring a license or any fees. Where the KJV is known to be deficient due to discovery of more authentic sources, exceptions can be made that use either more modern public domain translations as a baseline, or by using the original Greek or Hebrew.

There are 66 books in the KJV, comprised of 1,189 chapters, 31,102 verses, and 788,280 words.[7] The project could begin with translation of the New Testament, which is only 27 books, 260 chapters, 7,957 verses, and less than 200,000 words.

Retranslation at rate of 20 verses a day would complete the entire New Testament in about a year. With 5 good retranslators, that would be an average of only 4 verses a day per translator. At a faster rate of 20 verses per day by 5 good translators, the entire New Testament could be retranslated in less than 3 months.
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2009, 04:02:33 am »

  First Example - Liberal-Promoted Falsehood

The earliest, most authentic manuscripts of the Gospel According to Luke lack this verse fragment set forth at the start of Luke 23:34:[8]

    Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."

Is this a corruption of the original, perhaps promoted by liberals without regard to its authenticity? This does not appear in any other Gospel, and the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus did know what they were doing. This quotation is a favorite of liberals, although it does not appear in the earliest and best manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke. It should not appear in a conservative Bible, because in point of fact Jesus might never had said it at all.
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2009, 04:02:46 am »

  Second Example - Dishonestly Shrewd

At Luke 16:8, the NIV describes an enigmatic parable in which the "master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly." But is "shrewdly", which has connotations of dishonesty, the best term here? Being dishonestly shrewd is not an admirable trait.

The better conservative term, which became available only in 1851, is "resourceful". The manager was praised for being "resourceful", which is very different from dishonesty. Yet not even the ESV, which was published in 2001, contains a single use of the term "resourceful" in its entire translation of the Bible.
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2009, 04:02:57 am »

  Third Example - Socialism

Socialistic terminology permeates English translations of the Bible, without justification. This improperly encourages the "social justice" movement among Christians.

For example, the conservative word "volunteer" is mentioned only once in the ESV, yet the socialistic word "comrade" is used three times, "laborer(s)" is used 13 times, "labored" 15 times, and "fellow" (as in "fellow worker") is used 55 times.
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2009, 04:03:17 am »

  Advantages to a Conservative Bible Online

There are several striking advantages to a conservative approach to translating the Bible online:

    * participants learn enormously from the process
    * liberal bias - and lack of authenticity - become easier to recognize and address
    * by translating online, this utilizes the growing online resources that improve accuracy
    * supported by conservative principles, the project can be bolder in uprooting and excluding liberal distortions
    * the project can adapt quickly to future threats from liberals to biblical integrity
    * access is free and immediate to the growing internet audience, for their benefit
    * the ensuing debate would flesh out -- and stop -- the infiltration of churches by liberals pretending to be Christian, much as a vote by legislators exposes the liberals
    * this would bring the Bible to a new audience of political types, for their benefit; Bible courses in college Politics Departments would be welcome
    * this would debunk the pervasive and hurtful myth that Jesus would be a political liberal today
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2009, 04:03:45 am »

  References

   1. ↑ The committee in charge of updating the bestselling version, the NIV, is dominated by professors and higher-educated participants who can be expected to be liberal and feminist in outlook. As a result, the revision and replacement of the NIV will be influenced more by political correctness and other liberal distortions than by genuine examination of the oldest manuscripts. As a result of these political influences, it becomes desirable to develop a conservative translation that can serve, at a minimum, as a bulwark against the liberal manipulation of meaning in future versions.
   2. ↑ Additional less important guidelines include (1) adherence to a concise and dignifying style, such as use of "who" rather than "that" when referring to people and also use glorifying language for the remarkable achievements and (2) recognizing that Christianity introduced powerful new concepts that even the Greek and Hebrew were inadequate to express, but modern conservative language can express well.
   3. ↑ The NIV has supplanted the KJV in popularity.
   4. ↑ For example, in 1611 the conservative concept of "accountability" had not yet developed, and the King James Version does not use "accountable to God" in translating Romans 3:19; good modern translations do.
   5. ↑ See Bible on Addiction.
   6. ↑ For example, the English Standard Version (2001) does not use the word "****" anywhere in translating numerous references to the concept in the Bible.
   7. ↑ http://www.biblebelievers.com/believers-org/kjv-stats.html
   8. ↑ Quoted here from the NIV.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Elmer Jessup
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 136



« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2009, 04:04:19 am »

My fellow conservatives, take back your Bible! 
Report Spam   Logged

"I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance." - LUKE 5:32
"Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation; the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak."- MATTHEW 26:41
Manutius
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 120


I pray that God's an atheist


« Reply #11 on: December 10, 2009, 12:19:32 am »

I think that we should extend the reach of the Bible to those who otherwise would never be exposed to the word.

I suggest that important bible passages be printed on condoms. This will really drive home the good word to those that need it.
Report Spam   Logged

Shoot the homeless.
strages consanguinei me vos canis
Tom Hebert
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1370


« Reply #12 on: December 10, 2009, 02:05:00 am »

I don't know if this is such a good idea, Elmer.  You want to replace a so-called liberal bias with a conservative bias.  How does that get us any closer to the truth?
Report Spam   Logged
nikas
Guest
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2009, 12:35:42 am »

deleted!
« Last Edit: September 13, 2015, 08:43:04 pm by nikas » Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy