Atlantis Online
October 22, 2019, 12:43:20 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Comet theory collides with Clovis research, may explain disappearance of ancient people
http://uscnews.sc.edu/ARCH190.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

How 9/11 was done

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: How 9/11 was done  (Read 319 times)
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #45 on: September 21, 2009, 01:23:53 am »

Here is another short experiment that clearly shows the destructive power of thermite. Note the molten metal at the end of the clip (minute 1:49):


Url:

Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #46 on: September 21, 2009, 01:24:09 am »

In this dutch video it is shown how thermite is routinely used to bring down buildings. At 0:25 you can see that thermite charges are attached to columns at an angle in order to make the building 'walk'. The effect is that after the beam/column is cut the building moves somewhat horizontally so it can fall straight down afterwards. At 1:42 WTC columns are shown that are cut at an angle, as is routinely the case with controlled demolition:


Url:
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #47 on: September 21, 2009, 01:24:25 am »

This very short clip (37 secs) brings home the same message:


Url:
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #48 on: September 21, 2009, 01:24:45 am »

If you really want to go to the core watch this very thorough presentation about the WTC demolitions (2 hours) of Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth:


Url:
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #49 on: September 21, 2009, 01:25:01 am »

In my opinion it is the best video about the destruction of the WTC I have seen so far. Some highlights:

16:30 - Dan Rather says that for the 3rd time today a building was deliberately destroyed by 'dynamite'.
20:00 - the fire fighter about explosions.
39:20 - the WTC twin towers were 'worthless aging dinosaurs'.
41:00 - cost to tear the WTC down somewhere between 5-15 billion; WTC were 'condemned structures'; financial gain Silverstein: paid 3.2 billion, got 4.6, on his way to 7 billion.
45:00 - WTC was designed to withstand Boeing impact.
56:00 - orange flashes as proof of explosives.
1:04:00 - all core columns can be accessed through elevator shaft.
1:05:00 - many/all columns found under the rubble were of 30 feet length... ready for shipment (hence the haste and secrecy about this evidence).
1:05:45 - wireless detonation.
1:08:40 - impossible collapse pattern.
1:17:30 - squibs.
1:20:30 - Where is the debris? The pancakes? WTC was fully pulverized.
1:24:20 - the openly lying NIST shill.
1:26:08 - molten iron visible.
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #50 on: September 21, 2009, 01:25:22 am »

If you want some more proof, watch this documentary, 911 Mysteries Part 1 - Demolitions (90 minutes):


Url:
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #51 on: September 21, 2009, 01:25:39 am »

911 Mysteries – Part 1: Demolitions
2:05 – view on two fireballs
2:19 – minute size of the fires inside the towers prior to the collapse
2:58 – see the shadow of the fireball from the 2nd onto the 1st tower: size at least 100 meters.
3:19 – eye-witness with schmug explanation; probably planted
3:29 – another view on the minute size of the fire
3:51 – core of the official theory: ’Fire caused collapse’
4:10 – towers were designed to withstand large airliner crash (B707)
5:00 – denial of official story that the B676 were larger/heavier than the B707's the buildings were designed for
5:15 - full view on the fireball 2nd tower (5:18 zoomed in)
5:22 – firemen report about the minute size of fires ('2 isolated fires… able to knock down with 2 hoses')
5:45 – FEMA report confirmed that most of the fuel was consumed in the initial fireball during the first minutes after impact
5:55 – official story about how the fires supposedly brought down the buildings
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #52 on: September 21, 2009, 01:25:59 am »

6:16 – smoking buildings, meaning oxygen starved fires (like smoking, hardly burning wood blocks in a camp fire)
6:47 – person waving from a smoking story; impossible if there were raging fires.
7:08 – person from WTC Construction & Project Management states that the towers were probably able to withstand several impacts, not just one
7:35 – towers designed to withstand wind gusts of 225 km/h; buildings swing in the wind (the more than 100 meters high Euromast in Rotterdam/Netherlands can have an amplitude of 1 meter at the top during storm!). This kills the 'trusses broke off due to thermal deformation'; the buildings were flexible enough to withstand a theoretical thermal expansion of a couple of milimeters (if there was any sizable expansion in the first place).
7:50 – no difference between plane impact and a hurricane
8:40 – never in the history of the world has a steel building collapsed due to fire
9:04 – in 1975 there was a fire in WTC north tower that burned for 3 hours on several floors (twice as long as on 911); nothing happened then
9:28 – fires in Madrid (Windsor tower) in 2005; burning for 20 hours, much more severe than WTC; building’s core structure was undamaged
9:43 – comparison Madrid/WTC in 1 shot to see the difference
10:49 – clear impression of structural design twin towers
11:18 – excellent clear view on trusses and floor elements
11:32 – graphical representation of the official story of why the towers fell
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #53 on: September 21, 2009, 01:26:27 am »

11:52 – essence of the official story: ’if you drop your pants your legs will be destroyed as well’. Fortunately this is not true as is confirmed every night as we go to bed. Self defeating explanation: the core remains upright; in reality it came down as well. This can only be explained through controlled demolition of the core.
12:31 – witnesses report that there was no exessive heat inside the towers
12:45 – famous description by firefighters of how the towers came down, by explosions
13:05 – witness reports explosions before collapse
13:20 – other witness: explosions sounded like gun fire
13:27 – 3rd witness talks about explosions observed from 8th floor; several more witnesses report explosions before the collapse. Conclusion: the building was rigged with explosives that went off either unintentionally early or intentionally to pre-weaken the entire structure in preparation for its final collapse
14:00 – eyewitnesses that explicitly state that explosives were planted in the building
14:40 – the sound of explosions reaches us before we visually see the start of the collapse; the sound of imploding floors and trusses should have reached us after it. This is certain proof that explosions preceded and thus caused the collapse.
16:02 – thermal properties of steel; melting point 1500 C or higher (2750 F)
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #54 on: September 21, 2009, 01:26:43 am »

16:29 – open fires never hotter than 650 C. (red orange flames like in the WTC); steel stoves don’t melt even if they are used for months (iron stoves are obviously not cooled like car engines)
17:55 – likewise it is complete impossible that small scattered fires brought down these towers
19:10 – again the official story: a few floors failed and crushed upon lower floors crashing them in turn by their sheer weight and thus causing a domino-effect
19:25 – even if you accept (against all odds; remember the flexibility of the tower) that the fire caused floors to collapse, than the collapse of the core remains a mistery. Even the outer columns/mesh had probably to stay upright while the floors pancaked.
20:00 – collapse WTC identical with controlled demolished buildings
21:13 – metal and concrete is hurled away from the buildings sideways; a 270 ton piece of steel (weight twice of a Boeing airliner!) was hurled away 120 meter into a neigbouring building! Beams where sticking out of several neighbouring buildings.
22:44 – the falling top of the tower all over sudden disintegrating in mid-air!
24:47 – illustration of the free fall speed of the buildings
27:51 – proof that explosions took place in the basement prior to the collaps
28:36 – testimony William Rodriguez
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #55 on: September 21, 2009, 01:27:07 am »

31:00 – testimony of explosives everywhere in the basements of both towers and everywhere else
33:15 – prior to the collapse the building was systematically destroyed in slow pace by numerous explosions causing floors to collapse prior to the final collapse

33:45 – smoke from the tower at street level
35:24 – camera registers several explosions before the collapse
35:53 – squibs (demolition jargon) spraying from the building below the collapse level; well known phenomena during controlled demolitions
37:38 – very clear sqib from the sky-lobby
42:29 – molten metal. 8 weeks after the collapse there were still fires raging with underground molten metal with debrie temperatures of 600 C.
43:15 – Steven Jones stating that the only explanation for the presence of molten metal was that explosives like thermite had been used; thermite has molten iron as an end product, watch this short clip.
45:20 – second product of thermite reaction, aluminium oxide visible as white smoke
45:24 – evidence of thermite usage at 81-floor
46:00 – even the NYT confirmed that sulphur was found on the iron; sulphur lowers the melting point of iron (thermate) and gives even faster results
47:13 – official from demolition industry explains that usage of timers is the reason why it is called controlled (demolition).
47:27 – linear shape charge
47:55 – there are thousands of different types of explosives
49:15 – pre-weakening is standard procedure (hence all these observed explosions before the final blow in both towers)
49:42 – the beams that were found cut under an angle
51:32 – sequence of how the buildings were brought down
53:19 – Giuliani confessing that they knew in advance that the buildings were going to collapse.
54:10 - Silverstein idem dito: the decision was made to pull the building
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #56 on: September 21, 2009, 01:27:28 am »

55:09 – Silverstein, someone with 'international connections' (Israel comes to mind)
55:29 – explicit mentioning in the lease contract that Silverstein was allowed to rebuild the buildings in case they were destroyed
55:52 – Silverstein won 7 billion dollar on his initial investment of 15 million dollar (that’s a ROI of 500)
57:20 – WTC3/4/5/6 were infinitely more damaged than WTC7, but did not collapse; WTC7 did collapse
57:45 – construction workers in front of WTC7 who say that 'the building is coming down soon'!
58:15 – Silverstein caught lying about the meaning of the word 'pull'. There were no fire fighters to pull from the building. It’s real meaning was to bring down the building. Implying that the building had been prepared long before to come down (it is impossible to decide, plan and implement such an operation in a few hours)
58:42 – witness who says that the WTC7 first floor came down first and the rest followed (classic controlled demolition)
1:00:30 – possible motives for the intentional destruction of WTC7 (destruction SEC fraud records Worldcom and Enron)
1:04:45 – WTC power down weekend ('South Tower from the 48th floor up'… “This process, Forbes recalled, began early Saturday morning (September 8th) and continued until mid-Sunday afternoon (September 9th) – approximately 30 hours.”)
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #57 on: September 21, 2009, 01:27:43 am »

1:07:15 – the twin towers were big money losers
1:07:50 – WTC asbestos problem: al steel beams had been sprayed with fire proof asbestos; removal was almost undoable; costs expected to exceed 1 billion dollar. The 911 attack provided an opportunity for renewal of the complex (at the cost of european insurers: Allianz, Lloyds, Swiss Re, Zurich FS and others)
1:22:00 – companies were moved within the twin towers prior to 9/11; mysterious construction work was going on in the vacated spaces; people coming to work in the morning noticed that the office spaces were very dusty (implication: construction workers had worked at night ’preparing’ the building)
1:25:40 – view on the size of the fireball in comparison to the entire length of the building: a sphere at least one quarter of the entire building. Note that a second fireball was present at the point of impact.

For people who prefer reading about the collapse of the World Trade Centre here is one of the classic documents about the event from Steven Jones: "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?".

At this point only one conclusion can be drawn: the WTC-buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. No doubt about it.
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #58 on: September 21, 2009, 01:28:02 am »

Conclusion: ACT can be scrapped from our short list of possible suspects. Unless you want to assume that 19 Arabs not only hijacked 4 planes but also planted charges in the WTC just to make sure that a lot of damage would be created (in which case the whole point of hijacking of planes would be superfluous in the first place) we have to assume that a different scenario took place: inside job. What about the combination of LIHOP and demolition? Like: a government institution somehow knew of the plans of the Arabs beforehand and decided to 'help' a bit by planting the charges for them? This would draw a bill on the reliability of the Arabs to 'stick to their word' and 'show up' in time. Theoretically possible, but not very likely. Much more likely is that both events (planes and demolitions) were controlled by one invisible hand...

So the Arabs are out. Without much ado I present here an 'educated speculation' of what could have taken place before and at 9/11 if one accepts the thesis that the WTC buildings were blown up and I will try to back that story up later with snippets of evidence and facts available.This storyline is essentially the same as the attention drawer at the top of this blog plus some added comments.

Here we go...
Report Spam   Logged
Fallen Angel
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 1100



« Reply #59 on: September 21, 2009, 01:28:27 am »

Central Story Line

It was a masterly plot, carried out by a handfull of Israelis and dual passport 'Americans'. Larry Silverstein leases a nearly worthless WTC building complex (worthless due to the asbest the buildings were stuffed with) weeks before 9/11, makes sure it is over-ensured against terrorist acts, tellingly with a german ensurer, next hires an israeli security firm and in the 2-3 weekends before 9/11 cuts off power in all the WTC buildings with 'maintenance' as an excuse, so the buildings are virtually empty and the demolition experts can work undisturbed. At that moment the coast is clear to let a team of demolition experts from the israeli army led by Peer Segalovitz into the WTC buildings. These charges plus detonators had been prepared at the premises of the Urban Moving Systems company, a Mossad front. During these weekends these prepared charges were loaded into vans, driven into the basement of WTC next to the elevator shaft, unloaded into the elevator, and lifted onto the roof of the elevator through the openening in the elevator ceiling. Next the elevator moved from floor to floor while charges where being attached to the columns as displayed in this video from 0:22 onwards. The detonators of these charges were radiographic controlled and finally detonated from WTC7 on the day of 9/11.

Now we need to get rid of Atta and the other Arabs in order to keep our narrative alive. Although a number of hijackers have been reported to be alive after 9/11 there is no doubt about the existence of a real Mohammed Atta who lived in Hamburg and who disappeared in the summer of 2000. Let's speculate to see how far we can get (there is no proof for this whatsoever)...
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy