Ley Lines: A Definition

[KTCat]

Sungate – Have you actually read the research on the Russian Phi Pyramids?

http://www.abo.ru/english.html
http://www.pyramidoflife.com/

It's pretty phenomenal stuff, because that type of Pyramid is not like the Giza model; these pyramids actually heal and they are documenting it. We get all the hype about the Giza pyramid being "healing" but that appears to be all it is; just hype. In all my years of pyramid research I have not seen one shred of evidence that suggests the Giza pyramids can heal anything. If they were having a good effect on nature, you'd think you would see the Giza plateau in bloom by now, yet not even a blade of grass grows there. If they were having a healing effect on the human beings, then one should think all people in the entire Middle East, which is a virtual cluster of leys, would all be sucking on the psychic lollipop of Nirvana and living in bliss by now.

We know the phi pyramids are putting out a plume of negative ions, and it's not a joke. If you build them out of the right material, they are not going to hold a static charge. Does Giza hold a static charge? Oh yeah, and big time. But Giza is made up of millions and millions of tons of quartz surrounded by several million liters of water which is contained by the blocks. You can bet your life it's going to hold a static charge. The goal is to build something so it won't hold a static charge.

And I hadn't heard about anybody trying to build another ark of the covenant; the silly idiots! I'll bet they got zapped! Stonehenge will do that to you too! I read a story once of this poor guy who decided to stand on top of his VW bug parked in the parking lot, and he got out his dowsing rods and aimed them at the standing stones and got zapped with an electrical charge so hot it knocked him off the car, and gave him 3rd degree burns on his legs. And this should tell you something, Sungate. It should tell you that the energy running down the leys is running too hot, and too fast, and it's building up too much of a static charge in the earth. The goal then is to defuse that.

One of the best signs I see of this is in the formation of crop circles. I am not talking about the circles somebody hoaxes, but the ones that simply can't be explained. The top scientists studying the phenomenon are convinced of one thing; the circles are being formed some way by low temp plasma. The vast majority of those circles are forming very close to known ley lines. To create plasma you must have a source of positive ions and negative electrons. If there are enough positive ions in the field to generate a low temp plasma field, then you can count on the fact that the leys are running way too hot, and the quickest and easiest way to cool them down is to pull positive ions out of the field.

The goal of creating a pyramid so that it acts like a negative ion generator is to draw the positive ions out of the field, which are not that good for us. Positive ions are attracted to negative ions and when the two meet in the Pyramid's plume, they bond back to neutral again.

What do you mean a pyramid won't do any good unless they are placed at a ley intersection? Can't you figure out how to build a ley intersection yet? Gee whiz guy, look at some of the maps of the leys put up on this thread. Do you think all those ley lines "just happened"? No sugar plum, people built them! And it's not that hard to do. As long as you've got three points, as in a tetrahedron, you can get energy to flow. And we need to work on the leys, because the whole grid is out of whack and some people have been doing some pretty strange things with them. As long as we allow bad energy to keep flowing down the leys it's going to manifest itself in an earth that can no longer heal herself and people who can't deal with the energy.

I'm not afraid of the phi pyramids. I've been testing the phi models at home now for several years. They work. Try making the table-top model; and you'll see. If we can all make a table-top model and make up a set of agreed upon experiments, and share the outcome with each other, then we have accomplished step one. If the outcome is promising, then we go to step to and build the 16.85 foot model. If that pyramid proves itself healing to the planet, and we can see it with our own eyes and have documented our tests, then we go to step three and build the big one. If we take little baby steps and test what we are doing, then aren't we proceeding with safety? Oh and by the way, did you know they do make air ion testers these days? They also have electrostatic testers too. You know, if, as an online group we do this thing right, and document stuff, there is a pretty good chance we could apply for a grant and get this pyramid project funded. If we can prove a phi pyramid has a healing effect on the planet, then there is all kinds of money out there for funding environmental projects.

Don't worry about ley intersections, Sungate. They are not hard to build.

Oh, and here are a couple more ideas about building the table-top models…

There is really nothing very attractive about a phi high table-top model made out of foam-core. But it's easy to make up the old flour, salt and Elmer's glue mix and layer paper over the top of 'em. I went out and bought some of the decorative papers that are used by scrapbook hobbyists and it worked great. I've also made them by just layering water color paper over the top and then painting on them. It's a great venue for 3-D art.

Also, for those of you who really like a clean, contemporary look for your homes, you can make a cool looking phi high out of clear plexi-glass. Most Home Depot stores will cut the plexi-glass to size for you. Once you get your four sides home, all you have to do is tape the front edges of the side angles with masking tape, do this to each separate piece, then use wide masking tape to tape all four sides together from the inside. Once you have that done, you'll need some black silicone caulking, and just run a bead of caulking down the front side seams of your phi high. Once that is done, run a single edged razor blade down each seam to give the caulking a nice clean edge, and once the caulking sets up, remove all the masking tape. These are very, very cool looking pyramids and very artsy, professional and contemporary looking. If you want to, you can even get way artsy by painting the inside before you put the whole thing together. You have to do a sort of reverse painting technique, which means you put your main design on first, and then you can spray paint your background colors on. I'll bet Unknown, artsy as he is, could come up with some killer looking table top models.

[unknown]

Hi Everybody

Still following along... great thread everybody.

[rockessence]

"And how are you going to lift a box of dirt with a hole in the bottom? And why would you want holes in the sides of the boxes? "

The course of boxes would be sealed into place before filling.   The sides would have connecting holes to allow for energy flow.

[KTCat]

Rocky - Okay! I get what you are saying, now. You are talking about the ends of the boxes connecting to each other! Okay. That makes sense to me. Maybe that would work!

[rockessence]

Yes, you could not expect the energy to flow between separate boxes of dirt.

[KTCat]

OUTSTANDING! Cool idea. Thanks!

[Qoais]

So - do we have measurements for the table top pyramid?  How big a triangle(s) are they exactly?  I'll go tomorrow and get my friend the glass cutter to cut me some pieces if you tell me the exact sizes.  Can the plexiglass be the tinted stuff or does it matter?

What about the quartz in the mix?  Giza has tons of it apparently, but we only want a little bit?  That's so we get just enough of a charge but not too much - right?

You don't really think cardboard would stop energy flow do you?  Best to have the holes just in case I guess.

[Qoais]

Here is a copy of a post I made in Robert Sarmast's forum some time ago, when I was investigating the Ark of the Covenant.  It was my theory, that the thing was a power generator and I wanted to know how it worked:

In the book "The Templars and the Ark of the Covenant" by Graham Phillips, you will find a fantastic story about how he chased down the Ark and believes to have found a piece of it. He also found 3 of the stones used in the breastplate the priests wore when in it's presence. The Ark seemed to work very well for a time, and then started sputtering and mis-firing. Sometimes they could communicate with it and sometimes not. I think if someone researched this phenom. it would have interesting results.

In the book, Graham Phillips did kind of look into the power source of the Ark. A rare electromagnetic anomaly known as geoplasma.

Plasma is an electrically charged gas that has peculiar properties. In an ordinary gas, each atom contains an equal number of positive and negative charges, and the positive charges in the nucleus are surrounded by an equal number of negatively charged electrons. If an external energy source causes the atoms of a gas to release electrons, the atoms are left with a positive charge and the gas is said to be ionized. When enough atoms are ionized, the gas ignites with a "cold flame" that carries a strong static charge. This is known as plasma. Because it is as light as the air around it, plasma can hover or land in the air as a sphere or column of luminous gas that can move or remain stationary, depending on conditions, and can continue in this state for many minutes. Geoplasma is believed to be such a phenomenon caused by geodynamics - certain types of rocks being rubbed together by seismic activity to ionize the air above them.

The rocks concerned contain large amounts of iron oxide and quartz, (ooooh - we have "crystal") such as arenite sandstone and carnelian granite. In the 1990's some geologists proposed that factors beyond rock type and siesmic activity were necessary to produce geoplasma in the natural environment. Norwegian geologist Erling Strang considered that local variations in the earth's magnetic field were a contributing factor, and John Derr, of the US Geological Survey, suggested that water was an essential element in the production of geoplasma in the landscape. Heat produced by tectonic movement, he argued, creates a sheath of steam that coats the edges of a geological fault and serves to insulate the buildup of an electromagnetic charge.

Amost finished......

Most geoplasmic phenomena are reported during or after heavy rainfall. Heavy rainfall also accompanied the appearance of "the glory of the Lord" as witnessed by the ancient Israelites. Exodus 19:16 tells us that there were "thunders and lightnings, and a thick cloud upon the mount." The Exodus comparison of "the glory of the Lord" to "devouring fire" is an excellent description of a geoplasmic phenomenon.

I always wondered why a "god" would need gold, but the Ark and all it's accroutements were totally covered in gold. (Great conductor - gold)

I know less than nothing about the properties of gems or stones but here is a list for those rocket scientists to study, of the gems in the breastplate of the priests: (For those who don't read the Bible  )

Sardius, topaz , carbuncle, emerald, sapphire, diamond, ligure, agate and amethyst, beryl, onyx and jasper.
Some of these I know nothing about, but aren't the topaz, emerald, sapphire, diamond, amethyst, and onyx of crystal formation?

When I read the Bible, trying to figure this all out, I did notice that the Ark had a lip or rim for water (liquid anyway). The Bible says the people put the offering in front of the Ark and fire came out and "consumed" it. More like an ancient micro wave - instant supper!!!

I'm going to add just a bit more to show how Graham Phillips followed a path of clues and research:

He wondered if the Ark of the Covednant was actually some kind of geoplasmic device. The team of scientists from Oxford University had conducted experiments compressing carnelian granite and arenite sandstone cores to produce low-level geoplasma. He spoke with Dr. James Mellor, and asked him if it would be possible to make a device to artificially reproduce the phenomenon on a larger scale.
His answer was, that it would require a gigantic machine to compress the amount of rock required-completely impractical. "It may be possible to artificially produce earthlights [the term the team uses for geoplasma] without the need for a compressor by electron bombardment and a strong enough magnetic field. However, the only way to test that theory at present is with a particle accelerator, but there are not many of these in the world" Here we have that bombardment business again, as with the UFO reverse engineering-power source.
Conversation Between Graham Phillips and Dr. Mellor:

GP: Do you think it might be possible in the future to make a portable device to produce geoplasma?

Dr. M. It might, of solar energy could be harnessed by making photoelectric silicon cells to convert sunlight into enough electricity. Unfortunately, we have yet to discover how to maximize the conversion of solar into electric energy.

GP: If it could be done, what would a geoplasmic generator look like?

Dr. M: I have no idea, but it would need to have a carnelian granite or arenite sandstone core and be insulated by thick polycarbonate or a dense metal like lead or gold.

Perfect description of the Ark of the Covenant.
 
Qoais   

[Qoais]

Quoting myself again.

Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 1:51 am    Post subject: 
 
I just have to ask....
Don't you think it's kind of strange that the writers of the Bible went to such lengths to describe the Ark in minute detail? D'ya think maybe it was put there so those of us who came after, could figure it out and duplicate it? I mean, I know they were following Moses who was following God, but God had been talking to Moses all along, before he built the Ark. WHY did they need the Ark? Not to talk, although it did that too, but they used it for a weapon against their enemies. Don't you think it kind of strange also, that if God was leading Moses, and we know there were angels and other celestial beings, that they would need a MECHANICAL device? A SUPER mechanical device as comparable to nuclear devices that have radiation as a side effect? (The soldiers had to bathe in the river after using the Ark) The same side effect we find in the Vedas about the wars of the gods using nuclear power and the people having to bathe as water is the only respite from radiation. Both the Bible and the Vedas speak of this, the Vedas being older. Some remnant of superbeing still had the knowledge to build this device. You notice, that after it was supposedly hidden (and later found by the Templars and removed to England) it wasn't used any more. If it was so dangerous, how was it handled, unless it's energy source had been a) removed, b)depleted, or c) it had been removed FROM it's energy source
 
Qoais 

[Qoais]

The bits and pieces I found in my notes about Asteroid Alpha and the shape of spinning objects:

 
Thanks 3D - that worked.
In the cover story it says that due to it's fast rotation, particles flow from it's poles, to it's equator (arrowheads).
If this was man-made, would parts "flow"?


Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 2:26 am    Post subject: 
 
Weeellllll - I was sort of thinking of what we were talking about before, about how things that spin, become round. I mean the planets have been spinning for hundreds of thousands of years, and they all have become round. The asteroid belt has been spinning ever since the two planets collided at the forming of our solar system, same as earth has, and earth has long since become round. Why would that silly little asteroid, not become round as well? I mean, it IS a very wierd shape. And about this "flowing" one would kind of think that anything that was going to "flow" would have long since "flowed". Since the asteroid belt is made of of what earth is made up of, since it was a part of it at one time, either the chunks that flew off would now be "chunky" rock like pieces, or round pieces. Wouldn't they? That thing looks like a blimped out walnut. I didn't get to pop into the Library today, so haven't read the article. It resembles the shape of that man-made planet we were looking at before.
When I mentioned "man-made" and things "flowing" off, I didn't mean our type of man-made stuff, I meant the advanced technology type stuff like a planet made of graphite nanno-tubes. Our type of contruction allows for things to fly off. Seems like the 12th planet people had a little better system for putting things together. If THAT is a man-made planet out there, then it's been there for a very long time, and it's still got it's shape. Maybe some of the surface covering has "flown" off, but the shape is still there. Am I making this as clear as mud? Is there pictures of any other asteroids for comparison?
 
Qoais 

 
Was just looking up the technical definition of the two words used to describe this thing:
Geologically speaking:
Aggregate - made up of a mixture of mineral fragments, crystals or similar materials.

Unconsolidated - not shown - one has to look up consolidated, and infer the reverse thereof:
Consolidated - to combine into a single whole to make something strong, stable, firmly established.

So - we have an asteroid that is "loosely" rather than "firmly" made up of a number of different "rocks" I suppose if it's "loosely" put together, then parts could "flow" within the mixture. Since by usinging this terminology, I suppose them to mean that the thing isn't completely solid.
Isn't firmly combined. I'm not a scientist, but it seems a strange description for an asteroid. A strange description for a spacecraft as well  Since it isn't "solid", I suppose centrifugal force could hold the bits and pieces together. On the other hand, if the peices are loose, the spinning should maybe have spun all the pieces out into the galaxy! Guess I'll have to go to the library! One would think that if the poles have been "flowing" to the equator for hundreds of thousands of years, the silly thing would be flat as a pancake by now 
 
Qoais 

[DDDnD3D]

*** Hey Qoais, its funny i just read these old posts today back in the thread you started at the other forum "The Search For Truth and Enlightenment" in the General section. It was a relief to see that all that work hadnt been deleted like you thought it had. I also found the website to SCIENCE mag.   www.sciencemag.org  * the Nov.24 2006 issue, vol. 314, has this spectacular Blue/Green image on the Front Cover of ASTEROID ALPHA filling the full page. As you know Qoais I currently dont have the means to post images; so if somebody can go to the Science Mag. home page and click under "Previous Issues" and find this image of ALPHA and post it here I would be very grateful. I believe this THING has to be Seen by Everybody Here ! And its definitely worthy of a discussion, especially since our heads are spinning with talk of Ancient Spacecraft? Where Are They? Perhaps Now We Have Proof? If this THING is not Artificial I would be very surprised. I expect NASA or ESA will send a spaceprobe there soon.       DD****D

[DDDnD3D]

*** That is a Great image of ASTEROID ALPHA that you posted Qoais. I hadnt seen that one before ! Doesnt it look Incredibly Symmetrical? Where Is Everybody on This? Reading the science report there seems to be some odditys about it! Like for one its spinning unusually fast? Wouldnt This be the Archaeological Find of the Century? Along with The Face On Mars? and Iapetus? and?       DDD****

[Qoais]

Ohmigod 3D you're right.  I thought the forum was gone because the word Forum isn't in the legend any more.  If I had scrolled down farther I would have seen it!  I clicked on your link but can't get the articles on screen because I'm not a paid member.

[KTCat]

When making your first table-top pyramid, you might want to draw your pattern out on a large sheet of paper first. If you don't have any big paper around, just use the back side of some old gift wrapping paper. You can get four sides out of a sheet that measures 20X30, which is often a standard size for either foam-core or plexi-glass. You'll have a little bit of waste left over, but it won't be much. You'll need to lay out your four pieces against one side so that they alternate; apex, base, apex, base. That way one cut makes a side angle for two separate pieces. (I hope that made sense.) I don't think color matters in plexiglass. When I laid a pyramid out to cut on foamcore, I would measure off in eight 5.2" increments along one 30" edge of the foam core board. And then I would go up 16.85 inches from that edge and mark off a line that would determine the height of each piece. Then I would measure off in 5.2 inch increments along the line I'd just drawn. Then you draw you angles out so that each base is made up of two 5.2 inch increments.  I have a professional mat cutter at home, so that's what I used to cut the foam-core. In lieu of that you'll need a good metal straight edge and a box cutter with brand new blades. And I cannot emphasize the need to use sharp, new blades enough; if you don't you will get jagged, ugly, awful cuts. If somebody wants to build one out of foamcore and you don't want to mess around with cutting the pieces yourself, you can probably go to any arts and crafts store where they do picture framing and get them to cut the foamcore for you, as long as you already have the angles drawn out.

I keep drinking water charging in half gallon plastic jugs at all times and feel pretty good, but I am not much of a test there, because I am generally pretty healthy anyway.

Although I have lots of different kinds of rocks and semi-precious gemstones that I mess around with and experiment with in the Pyramids, I always keep both bloodstone and red jasper charging in a pyramid at all times. I have two sets of these stones, so I keep one charging and use the other one for holding, or pondering, or whatever one does when one goes "out there" and "within" in search of answers. My goal was to find out if there was anything to the science I found encoded in the Book of Revelations, and John makes a big deal about the importance of the "foundation of jasper." I know enough about stone healing to know that bloodstone was held sacred by all the early Christians, and before them it was held sacred as the stone representing the Universal Christos or Christ consciousness, which was held to be the ultimate source for universal healing energy. And that healing field is the energy source I wanted to connect to. So for me anyway, Bloodstone, which is a type of jasper, was the logical choice in the "foundation of jasper" to represent the Universal Father. I found a couple of 2 inch orbs of bloodstone for sale at a pretty good price on e-bay. But, I don't think a person needs anything that big. If there is a lapidary store in your area they will usually have bloodstone cabochons or something. You can find bead strands of it too at any number of online gemstone dealers. I really like this stone a lot. And of course, Red Jasper is the "earth stone" and our connection to the energy field of our mother planet. This stone isn't just for healing the earth; shamanistic societies from day one have revered this stone because it helps a person to really connect to the earth, to hear her, and feel her and know her.

Today, everybody is worried about the environment and global warming, which is all well and good. But environmentalists often go off half ****ed, so to speak. Maybe they are just people who are living in a 2-bdrm apartment somewhere in the middle of a huge city, so they don't have much personal contact or connection to the earth in their daily lives. The red jasper helps people connect to our planet, and know and understand her better, and I think it is a stone that everybody concerned about the environment and global warming should use. Too many huge, globalist corporations are funding so called "environmental" projects that often "sound good" to people who really don't know very much about mother nature, but behind that funding are often corporate goals that have far more to do with making money, or manipulating people into doing things that actually doesn't help nature out much all.

One of the best examples of this was during the eighties, when the "save the spotted owl" environmental movement literally closed down all old growth logging in northern California, Idaho, Washington and Oregon. Every environmentalist in the nation got on that bandwagon. Who funded the movement? The group of European investors that made up the huge corporate conglomerate known as "Cavenham Timber Industries" funded the spotted owl movement. They had just bought millions and millions of acres of young second-growth timber from Crown Zellerbauch and Weyerhaeuser. They owned a whole bunch of trees nobody wanted to mill, because actually those trees were too young to cut. So those money-grubbing corporate #@$%, funded the spotted owl movement to shut down logging in old growth timber, which forced the mills to buy their second growth, and the corporate money-grubbers laughed all the way to the bank. They forced the mills to buy their crap "pecker poles", and today, that's why you have to paw through mountains of 2X4s when you go to build something, just looking for a straight piece of wood. Closing down logging in old growth timber didn't "save" a single spotted owl. They are dying off because barn owls are increasing, and barn owls prey on the smaller spotted owls. The whole dang thing was simply a scam, and millions and millions of environmentalists fell for it and allowed themselves to be used. And I know this happened, because I knew the man who set up the deal for Cavenham in the first place. The Big Boys play some pretty sneaky, down and dirty games.

Anyway, the point of Red Jasper is to get you to "connect" to the earth in ways that really do some good. Since I have been using it, which has been for several years now, my consciousness and awareness of how the planet really works and how things work and fit together has increased 100 fold. I am personally convinced that red Jasper in some way really does "tune" the human mind in to truly good and effective change about the environment. It makes you more conscious of the role each of us plays in the well-being or distress of our planet. It makes you think things out so that one doesn't go off half-****ed. And I think it is an especially important stone for city dwellers to use because they don't get their hands dirty in the soil very often, and though they mean well, they often push through environmental legislation that in the long run really does more harm than good.

Today, people and little children especially are so concerned about global warming and the environment, and there is nothing wrong with that. But I worry because emotions over it are running high these days. When you find huge groups of lobbyists today trying to push through some sort of "environmental" act, wisdom dictates everybody stand back, take a breather, and look at who is coming up with the funding to push that bill through. If it's being funded by big money and big corporations, then you'd better look at the small print in that bill with a fine-toothed comb, because chances are the legislation somebody is trying to push through doesn't have a darned thing to do with saving the environment, but is really all about making somebody more money, or putting more power and control in the hands of corporate power freaks.

Red Jasper is a good stone because Mother Nature is no dummy, and if you are contemplating something environmental that isn't going to help her at all, she'll find a way to knock some sense into you, before it's too late.

Anyway, the "Foundation of Jasper" represents a Mother/Father god concept that I am comfortable with, because it allowed me to see the Divine in both masculine and feminine energies. I am not big on the patriarchal god system taught by most religions, and I was equally uncomfortable with a lot of the Goddess worship groups too. No offence to Isis or anything, but I live on the earth, and it just didn't make any sense to me to be worshipping at the feet of some goddess representing Sirius, when I lived on a totally different world. Besides, Sirius is a dying star system. Sirius B has a gravitational field 400 times that of earth. The astrophysicists say that if the star had more mass, it would be a black hole today. Sirius A has gone "wolfram" (what an odd word) which means that it is burning its nuclear fuel five times faster, and hotter than our own sun is. Sirius A does have enough mass that astronomers think it may become a black hole one of these days, though thousands of years in our future. Anyway, I hate to tell the Isis worshippers the bad news, but that constellation is on its way out, and is certainly incapable of supporting life as we know it. I know there are just tons of people on this world today that are into the whole Sirius/Orion and Isis and Osirus worship thing, but I would like to point out the obvious. It's Mother Earth that is feeding those people and putting a roof over their heads. Take care of the Mother. We need her to survive.

Orion, by the way, is not capable of supporting life either. It is an extremely unstable star system, and a, very, very young constellation. It's much younger than our own earth is according to any number of good astronomy sites. I have no idea why Sirius and Orion played such a pivotal role in the Giza complex and the ley-lines, but it's pretty obvious that the builders intended to couple the energy fields running through the leys to these two constellations in a major way. Sirius is literally frying today, and that is no joke, so I wonder what coupling to the energy field of Sirius is doing to the earth. And I feel the same way about Orion. Orion is a very young constellation that is still bouncing around out there like a four year old who has had way, way too much sugar for the day. You know, if you take the old "As above, so below" adage, and actually LOOK at the constellations the ancients appeared to couple earth's ley system too, one starts to really question the wisdom in what they did, because the energy fields of both Sirius and Orion would not be particularly good for this earth. True story, guys. Just go to a few astronomy sites, and you will see what I mean.

[Qoais]

Hi KTCat
I'm a little slow at math, but you said 8 - 5.2 increments - which equals 41.0"  But you said a 20x30" board?  Am I missing something?