Atlantis Online
November 20, 2019, 11:16:29 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: USA showered by a watery comet ~11,000 years ago, ending the Golden Age of man in America
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20050926/mammoth_02.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

Blobs Inside Earth Might Explain Rapid Mountain Building

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Blobs Inside Earth Might Explain Rapid Mountain Building  (Read 92 times)
Derek
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 2181



« on: June 23, 2007, 03:04:25 am »

Blobs Inside Earth Might Explain Rapid Mountain Building
By Robert Roy Britt, LiveScience Managing Editor


posted: 27 January 2006 09:30 am ET

The Andes mountains rose to their dizzying heights in as little as 7 million years, a new study concludes.
The research, reported today in the journal Science, adds to another recent study that found mountains grow much more quickly than scientists had thought.
How it's done needs to be rethought, and one idea involves a giant blob of material inside the Earth.
"These results really change the paradigm of understanding of how mountain belts grow," says Carmala Garzione at the University of Rochester. "We've always assumed that the folding and faulting in the upper crust produced high elevation mountains. Now we have data on ancient mountain elevation that shows something else is responsible for the mountains' uplift."
The challenge
As mountains rise, they are constantly weathered, making it hard for scientists to look back in the geologic record and figure out just how tall they were at any moment.
Scientists look at plant fossils in soil layers and apply knowledge of what elevations the plants would have grown at. But climates change and plants adapt, so the method is imprecise.
"Estimates of the timing of mountain range formation often differ by millions of years, even for geologically young areas," write geoscientists Michael Poage and C. Page Chamberlain in a separate article in the journal analyzing the new work.
Garzione and colleagues examined sediments that had collected over time at the base of a mountain in the Andes. There she found a record of the altitude from which the sediments came, by looking at clues such as how much oxygen was in the rainwater that eroded the sediment.
The evidence suggested the Andes shot up between 10 million and 7 million years ago.
"When I first showed this data to others, they had a hard time believing that mountains could pop up so quickly," Garzione said this week.
The research was led by Prosenjit Ghosh and John M. Eiler of the California Institute of Technology.
The research team then examined the same sediment for clues about the temperatures in which it formed, another indicator of altitude. The warmer it is, for example, the more atoms are vibrating, which changes when and how their bonds break and rejoin in chemical reactions. The results pointed to the same time frame.
"With supporting data from the new paleotemperature technique, we have more confidence in the uplift history and can determine processes that caused the mountains to rise," Garzione said.
A study last June used yet a different method to determine that mountains in western Norway had been built in a surprisingly short 13 million years, rather than the 40 million that had been thought.
The blob theory
The towering South American Andes-the average height is 13,000 feet-must have risen more than half a mile every million years, according to Garzione and her colleagues.
Garzione favors a controversial theory called "deblobbing" to explain the rapid rise. It goes like this:
When two plates of Earth's crust collide, the swell of a mountain range develops. Below, in the solid portion of the upper mantle, a blob of material clings to the rising swell. The blob acts like an anchor and the mountains rise slowly. At some point, the blob disconnects and the mountains spring upward.
"Our data argue that the mantle just accumulates down there until some critical moment when it becomes unstable and drops off," Garzione said.
It might be possible to search for these blobs using seismic techniques. Perhaps one sits beneath California's Sierra Nevada range, Garzione speculates. If so, it might detach in a few million years and allow those mountains to soar.
Mt. Everest Shorter Than Thought
A Natural Compass: Rock Cracks Point North
Hole Drilled to Bottom of Earth's Crust, Breakthrough to Mantle Looms
Surprise: High Ozone Levels in Mountains of Tibet
Image Gallery: Blue Marble Art
What's Down There




The Earth's radius is about 4,000 miles (6,400 kilometers). The main layers of its interior are in descending order: crust, mantle and core.
The crust thickness averages about 18 miles (30 kilometers) under the continents, but is only about 3 miles (5 kilometers) under the oceans. It is light and brittle and can break. In fact it's fractured into more than a dozen major plates and several minor ones. It is where most earthquakes originate.
The mantle is more flexible - it flows instead of fractures. It extends down to about 1,800 miles (2,900 kilometers) below the surface.
The core consists of a solid inner core and a fluid outer core. The fluid contains iron, which, as it moves, generates the Earth's magnetic field. The crust and upper mantle form the lithosphere, which is broken up into several plates that float on top of the hot molten mantle below.
SOURCE: LiveScience reporting
 
 
 http://www.livescience.com/environment/060127_mountain_building.html
Report Spam   Logged

Mark of Australia
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 703



« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2007, 09:56:21 pm »

Hi Derek ,

Awesome stuff !! ,So it seems mountain building isn't as understood as they like to believe... Rebecca will find this very interesting.
Report Spam   Logged
Rebecca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 5201



« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2007, 04:19:17 am »

Hi Mark,

I found the article interesting, however, I thought it was purposely vague when it came to describing the internal mechanism that caused the mountains to rise. And, seven million years?  That is quick, in geological terms, that is, but, for our purposes (Atlantis), we need to uncover a geological phenomenum that would be a lot quicker.
Report Spam   Logged
KTCat
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 248



« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2007, 10:57:02 am »

Quote
And, seven million years?  That is quick, in geological terms, that is, but, for our purposes (Atlantis), we need to uncover a geological phenomenum that would be a lot quicker. 
 
 

Rebecca, I live quite near Mt. St. Helens, the big mountain in Washington state that blew her top back in the 80's. Since then, Mt. St. Helens has been rebuilding her mountain with totally awesome speed. Were I not living in an area where regular reports are made everytime that mountain decides to take off and build herself again, I would probably also believe that mountain building takes a very long time, but it doesn't! Many mountains are basically volcanos, and those that are can build and rebuild themselves so fast it's simply amazing.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2007, 01:22:38 pm by KTCat » Report Spam   Logged

Live Long and Prosper, but please be kind to each other...
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy