When you ask him to cite references, Cleasterwood, he claims he has Alzheimer's......
He just only succeeds in derailing pretty well every thread he "darkens", just like he
just did this one. Our people avoid it like the plague. Just like any TROLL does.....P I T Y !!!
.
DEAR -> BIANCA, The
villified Doctor of geology
VELIKOVSKY ( 1895-1980.)had discovered around
1949 that the
traditional TIMELINE devised by Archaeologist Brugsch (
in 1855.)based on priest-MANETHOON's Aegyptiaka,(
dd: 258 bc.) was faulty and he spent
500 pages larded with footnote-
references to proof that beyond doubt.
Dr.V's TIMELINE-default- discovery of 500 spook years in egyptian history came about when he compared the deeds of egyptian Kings of the
6-th,
12-th
18-th and
22-th Dynasties and concluded that these were variant-versions from
ONE Dynasty only the
18-th Dyn. which inexplicably was split and dispersed over other epochs. The Dates of the 18-th Dyn, are falsh . The dates of the
22-th Dyn. are however the REAL-Dates for the
18-th Dyn.
Thus Dr.V.could equate Pharaohs TUTMOSE-1,-2,-3 easily with: the sequence SAUL- DAVID & SOLOMON= sons-of-RE
Despite his rejected '
REVISED-Chronology, others -without mentioning him out of shame-have attemted the same but named this
NEW-Chronology ''>> NC-Pope & Dr.DAVID ROHL. (+ Ahmed Osman.) The only Faithfull ' Revised- Chronologist ', left is Prof. Gunnar
HEINSOHN from Bremen Univ. with his '
SARGON's MIRROR, in the wake, style and manner of Dr.V. in which book ( 1989.)he explains that the FIRST babylonian Dynasty is an inserted- copy of the much later Achaemid-Persian Dynasty.
Yet most professional Egyptologists who had spent a lifetime remembring all the intricate Reign-Data of mostly
shadowy-Pharaohs, felt slighted by a
Tall-tale-telling funny-Story telling
Interloper that they subsequently named a Scientific-Charlatan an ancient-history-Heretic, blasphemous interloper, a man that upset the egyptian chronology Applecart etc.etc.
ALAS he himself had, for copy reasons, avoided to make a
TIMELINE-Chart other than some minimal scetches.
This lukehole, I attempted to fill by my TIMELINE-Chart( 17 Mb.) based on his discoveries in 1949. for indeed by this ommission he has kept even his own ' followers ' and adherends ' groping-in-the dark.'
Most reactions that I got from ThreadPost-readers was: " Colourfull " but I never got constructive reactions beyond the phrase ' Colourfull '.
in Litterary research, professional scholars are bound to look for evidential-reference sources footnotes and such, but when these arfe not read anyway, what practical use do they have to the casual reader or watcher of E.G.
Discovery-Channel-TV. or National-Geographic, who were desintrested in even READING my TIMELINE.
'Smiley', QUAIS, GEORGEOS, TOM HERBERT and JULIA have SEEN but not read( ' my') TIMELINE and thus they have learned NOTHING from just glancing at it.
If Dr Velikovsky(
since-1949-.) has failed to attract worldwide support for his
heavily referenced TIMELINE-discovery, why would I go through that trouble with my Alzheimer's ailment !?
All my discoveries were
referenced by Dr Velikovsky at one time or another in one of his
6 Books on the subject and many people who claim to have read these books (-partly-) are still waiting on SOME -other-AUTHORITY, that by references will verify his findings.
These Autorities exist and were equally ignored or not read properly, but the ZEST of their Commentaries was typically, that Dr. Velikovsky made no discoveries of his own but just needled-together the connected-references of others together and claimed these as his own discoveries.
Still others say that he made unbased assumptions and changed ancient (-egyptian-)Chronology without authorithy, ignoring the many footnotes ( that they did not read because they were biased against Dr.V. anyway. )
His main discovery is in having
READ the lives of the 150-odd-Pharaohs from Dynasty- ONE untill DYNASTY-30, and by by just COMPARING them came to the conclusion that some DYNASTIES were just copies of previous ones.
Ofcourse scholars were
asking for references which he could not give for this notion since nobody else before him commented on this discovery, thus the scholars said that
by not giving references, he was making it up.But when he subsequently DID make reference, nobody read them.(>> Ages-in-Chaos;1949-50/ The SEA-Peoples-in: 1970-71./ Rameses-2 in: 1975.) his original publisher( Doubleday-) was boycotted.
In 1975 he was officially invited at a University-symposium to defend his TIMELINE-Theory, but his opponents were mainly astrophysicists because professional Egyptologists, declined to attend, and he was booed away by Historians that knew neither Bible/ Tenach nor Talmud nor ancient Egyptian history.
I see here some paralells with the
FIRST MELOS-Conference about ATLANTIS in 2005.
My ' ABSTRACT ' was rejected mainly because I wrote it in
ARRIAL, ( which is the same FONT that I am writing in now.)whilst the Ballot-Comitty wanted it rendered exclusively in
Times-new-Roman.
A list of
25 REFFERENCE-POINTS was recommended that had to be quoted in the Abstracts,"
BRYNWNS ' afterwards sent me these and
25 others to comment upon to prove that my Theory
of Atlantis in ADEN/Arabia was not on. So I copied her List and put my ANSWERS BEHIND THEM WHICH MADE THE post A BIT TOO LARGE TO read, thus even ' As I was saying Earlier' she had no stomach or time, to verify my 50 answers to her own 50-reference-points.( in AR, but I ignore / forget, the POST-Number.)
As I was saying earlier:
PLATO's Atlantis SAGA, suffered some considerable but largely ignored DATA_LOSSes, from the interference of the Roman Compilators.
ANACHRONISMS in PLATO's Atlantis-Saga:The fact that english readers are not disturbed by Plato's
anachronisms and thus do -not- comment on these ' minor-detaills ' is pretty tale-telling for the way in which Forum commentators did not deal with other minor faults that escaped their wit.
FOR instance PLATO could not have given REFERENCE to historic Events that happened
after his death yet these are interwoven in his Dialogues:
ATHENS & HELLENES did not exist in Atlantis, because the proper names were:
ATHE & HELL/=HADES. because ATHENS means just 'NEW_ ATHE (- and Atlantis' memory as a perfect State was later marred by vilification, Atlantis-Utopia became HADES or the Underworld( Hindu >>from ' Atala ', to: ' Patala'.)
REFERENCES to '
ASIA & LYBIA ' are suspect too, because the ' ASIA & LYBIA ' of Plato's time( dd.
366 bc.) and before Year
1000 bc were entirely different countries " 5.000 " miles apart. LYBIA used to be ERYTRAEA and ASIA used to be: ARABIA, it was because of ' Völkerwanderung ' Nation-re-settlement, by Atlantean colonists that the names ASIA & LYBIA were re-used in the colonist states: Greece was re-named in
1000 bc with the Nine-rivers of HADES and the Island BOEOTIA was a re-naming of DJIBUTI.
The
DIMENTIONS that PLATO mentions were entirely correct( for present day ADEN,)but were also
enlarged by a DECIMAL probably when Homer exagerated them in his lyric Metrums, and this competed badly, with Plato's Prose. No mistake like in exchange of Egyption icons for 100 or 1.000 were the cause of this exaggeration.
BEAR with me how the EXAGGERATION by a decimal came about: Plato speaks of
TEN- ISLES yet describes only One( The nine others being of similar nature.)
There were
NINE( side- canals , to a main-canal, in Atlantis( or only ONE ?) the
2.million inhabitants were probably only
20.000, the circumference of the PLAIN 2.000 by 3.000
Miles (' Stadia ".)may have been only
Meters.Even these
TEN Kings may have only been ONE or Tree: Atlas; Epimetheus & Prometheus( Sometimes: Chretheus. or Xuthus.)These are well known Rollmodels in Greek Myth, but they did not live in pre-historic calcholitic-Times. not from
10.000 bc. ! ! ! !
GREECE was settled by Greek (= Pelgasken: Achaians,Danaides & Ionians.)only from
1000 bc thus by any ( even falsh-)standards no Atlantic attack could have taken place in Greece nor Athens because these did not exist BEFORE Atlantis demise, yet every
Atlantologist believes that Atlantis Attacked Athens ( in 10.000 bc.? ? )
NEW-ATHE, or
Athens, was founded in 1000 bc by the settlers from 'Atlantis-Metropolis': GELANOR, a relative (> uncle.)of DANAOS, who came there 50 years later as a refugy from his brother Egyptos, and established a
REPUBLIC/ of ATHE.
In
900 bc CECROPS, the egyptian vassal-king, from Atlantis-Metropolis founded the first KINGDOM-of-Athens, and in the REIGN of his son ERECHTHEUS, in 855 bc that GREAT TSUNAMI-or
seismic wave that shook Atlantis(= metropoli.)from it's foundations took place.
CONCLUSION:Atlantis in the Atlantic-Ocean as an Island-Realm is a fallacy from a mis-interpretation of Plato's geo/ topographic-jargon. " island " means Promotory or CAPE or 'Point-Atlantis' which only was named a single island because of a simple shallow man made-isthumus, 'separating it from a mainland ".as a Tombolo. Ras-ADEN means the " Raised-City of Aden ".
ANY Professional VULCANOLOGIST would instandly recognize Atlantis as a vulcano-based Kingdom, but for some odd reason no Vulcanologists was invited nor was any of the present Atlantologists familiar with Vulcanology which left room for the flash interpretation that Atlantis destruction and submergence, was caused by the Thera-Explosion in:
1450 bc.( the real date of the Minoan-Crete-destruction is
855 bc.)
A
TLANTIS was originally written as A
TH-Lantis
Plato's Atlantis and Atlantis Royal-City-
Posidonis', or rather Atlantis-Metropolis, was originally named; A
THE or : RAS-ADEN in Arabia/ Yemen.. . . . It's TIMELINE was: 1075-855 bc, The PRODUCE of Atlantis/Aden was FRANCINCENSE. DAN also means Land-of- Dan.
In the Koran, ATLANTIS is named
LAND-of-AD- or LAND-of-DAN, which is equated with ADEN-in Yemen. Aden was once CATHAN, or KETHURA.(= keftiu or CITTIM.)
This REALM of Atlantis=ADEN comprised religious-monastryLand in jargon: LAND in the
THIRD-HAND of EGYPT also called '
MIDDLE '-Egypt as opposed to UPPER & LOWER-Egypt. This Middle-Egypt was an invisible Never-Never land, a Priestly Aristocracy of-AMON, thus the
HOLY-LAND(= of Palestine or
AMMON.)Thus the Christian/Jewish "
HOLY-LAND "was originally The HOLY-LAND-of-God-
AMUN.")
AFTER the Last TSUNAMI in
855 bc the Assyrians took over the HOLY-LAND and used the Proceeds to wage a War of agression, against Egypt and the rest of the (Middle-) EAST. Only SETI-ONE & RAMESSES-2 attempted to regain and keep Atlantis/ADEN, which meanwhile was RE-Named " KAR-CHEMIS " or: ' City-of-Moses.")
When RAMMESSES-2 in his THIRD Campagn ( dd revised chronology:
605 bc.)was superceded by Mursillis-2 and Hatusillis-3(= Nabopolassar & Nebukadnesar.)and abandoned Atlantis/ADEN on the treacherous advice of his First Prophet-of-Amun: JEREMIAS, he started to built GIANT statues of himself, whilst he left his LOYAL SUBJECTS in Aden as the
FIRST HOLOCAUST victims, to be deported to Babylon. The 'common/official date of Ramesses-2 as 1200 is falsh.
When AKNATEN lost his
TENEHU, or
ACHAD(= ADEN.)he rebuild a ficticius "Atlantis'that he named ACHAD or "
AKET-en-ATEN ". and he crowned his two sons with the CROWN for Prince-of -Atlantisa, the TATENEN-or HEB-HEB-CROWN with the ONE ( or THREE-)Baskets- with- a- Sundisk on top , accompagnied by SIX snakes.
THIS was a pretence of possession of ADEN, at a time that it was allready in the hands of the ennemy for 30 years.
The ATEN or ATHON was NOT a Sun-Disk but a Moon-Disk( from: Phea-Athon.)hence the Cananites Amorites and Amalakit-Hyksos were named in greek: PU-Phaeaceans.) from PUNT-Land.
The fact that the Kings of RETENU / ISRAEL, appealed in VAIN for Egypt's military support and were instead reprimanded by the expeditionary force send by ACH-en-ATEN's general Rechmire for resisting the Assyrian Vassal tribute demands is a good indication, how Assyrian territory expanded ' unofficially ' from Cilicia to the Gulf-of-Aden.
Plato's OCEANUS or ATLANTIC_SEA was the Gulf-of-ADEN as a brance from the 'TREAL'Ocean(= indian-Ocean.)when the Atlantea-DESASTER refugies started to colonize Greece they renamed the Egyptian BLUE-SEA as the
WORLD-OCEAN, or EARTH-ENCOMPASSING Sea, which in Latin reads as
MEDIA-TERRA-
NEAALL Atlantologists at MELOS-1/ 2005 ignorantly assumed that the present Atlantic Ocean is the very same as the ATLANTIKUM - - PELAGIOUS of Plato.
These amateur historians simply ignore that this OCEAN's original name was just; " SPANISH_SEA " the namechange occurred in
1648 -ad, at the TREATY of MÜNSTER in Germany instignated by the Dutch participants for a very good if-silly reason.
The Dutch rebels waged a cessession-War with SPAIN from
1568-until 1648 (or 1649.)which was granted by Spain in a Treaty at Münster, ( mainly because at the End the Dutch got british fleet support.)
Yet at the
Treaty conference at Münster the Dutch were supposedly the big winners of the
80-years-WAR and thus they demanded that the
SPANISH- SEA, that they had to cross constantly to reach their Dutch East-Indian-Colonies(= indonesia.)wasa to change it's name as a token that the DUTCH had won a major War with Spain, various names were proposed: German SEA, British SEA, FRENCH-SEA ! but not a Dutch-Sea-ofcourse-! So the Dutch-party at this Peace-Treaty opted for a more 'Neutral-Name'such as a ficticious but perfectly honest classical name as: " Atlantic-Ocean ".
As for the
Theory of ATLANTIS -in-SPAIN: King Alphonse decreed in 1500,( or 1490, opinions vary.) that SPAIN was: ' HESPERIS 'and although that ' Notion 'made MARROCO automatically the AtLANTIS of Plato, Hesperis's ' King HEBRUS ' had once married Atlas's daughter CABIRA, and thus HESPERIS/= SPAIN was the HERITOR of ATLANTIS a simple deduction for simple minds.
By this ficticious 'NOTION, King Ferdinand SANCTIONED his occupation of MARROCO from
1500-until a counter-attack from the King of Mauretania in
1515.)Ever since SPAIN declared Gibraltar and mellilla as the supposedly 'PILLARS-of-HERCULES' and placed them on the Royal Coins with caption' PLUS-ULTRA'
ALAS for Pilot-Major COLUMBUST he was originally looking not for ashorter way to india but for ATLANTIS, various regions in South-America still bear Names from ' Atlantis ' ( like YUKATAN>>for JOKTAN, in Oman.)
Not to be made a fool of, Columbust had to cange his ships 'diary' so he re-wrote it striking the words Atlantis, and purporting that he had lost the original Log.
I apologize beforehand when I have to denounce the - 55-Oceanic ATLANTOLOGISTS( INCLUDING 'dear GEORGEOS', that by their natural-egyptology- ignorance all Atlantean researchers or Atlantologists with their -
respected-theories are barking-up the wrong tree, my THEORY is not ' just- another- Theory ' about Atlantis, because I have ( generally-)proven that the other Theories on the Subject are incomplete and faulty they have not found Atlantis, I have.
Dr KÜHNE has mentioned that
SCHERIA which Odysseus visited was similar -if-not-the-same as-Atlantis. A Fine statement, but he too ignored that ESHERIA is the -still existant- name ( Locally.) for the Frankincense fields at ADEN, in Arabia.)
Would you still want a list of ' REFERENCES 'added or won't you read it neither ? ? ?
IF you have not done so yet, PLEASE READ my
SUBscript
instead, THANK YOU
(
I appologize for presenting you with thix lengthly statement in defence of my Theory.
PS I Loved your AKNATON Article, dosn't he sound a bit like ' PYGMALION ' in his effort for a peacefull religion ? ?.)
Sincerely
"
BlueHue "
DD.
11 Aug. 2007