Atlantis Online
March 28, 2024, 11:55:40 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Remains of ancient civilisation discovered on the bottom of a lake
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20071227/94372640.html
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Staff List Calendar Login Register  

SARDINIA (SARDEGNA)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: SARDINIA (SARDEGNA)  (Read 4775 times)
0 Members and 52 Guests are viewing this topic.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #15 on: September 28, 2008, 11:43:33 am »









The real beginning of the Nuraghic Civilization goes back to the final phase of the Bonnanaro's Culture, which will developing uninterruptedly up to the VI century B.C., enduring in some areas, till the Roman conquest.

In addition to the nuraghic, the "corridors" (or protonuraghis) and "tholos" (simple or complex nature), the nuraghic civilization produced a remarkable architectural development: civil (villages), religious (sacred wells, sacred sources, small temples "in antis") and funereal (giants' graves).

The productions of the "bronze statuettes" dates to the Iron Age, they are "ex-voto" and represent animals, nacelles and other objects of the various nuraghic world.

The mines' exploitation was of course the principal resource of this period: close to the figured bronzes, there is a production of weapons, utensils and various objects in bronze, having few equals in the rest of the Mediterranean.

The metal of the Island was also the incentive pushing Cretan, Mycenean, Cypriot merchants and, subsequently, Phoenician to attend Sardinia, establishing at the beginning seasonal and later stable ports.

Through the Phoenician commercial ports had origin cities as Karalis, Sulci, Nora and Bithia from which (under the control of Carthage) will start the Punic conquest of the island, in the VI century B.C.. In the 238 B.C., after the I punic war, Sardinia will pass under the Roman dominion, but the conquest of the island, after various native revolts, can be considered only concluded in the I century B. C..

Sardinia became Roman province in the Imperial Epoch and saw a notable development of urban
centers and road system.



http://www.mondosardegna.net/eng/storia/storiaantica.htm
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2008, 11:46:12 am »










                                                      T H E   N U R A G H I






The Nuraghe /nu'rage/ is the main archaeological monument of Sardinia.

The plural is "nuraghi".



It is typically a truncated cone tower, in the shape of a beehive, built with huge square blocks of stone, and usually located in a panoramic position.

The monument has no foundations, and stands only due to the of the weight of stones, which may weigh as much as several tons.

Some Nuraghi are more than 20 metres in height.

Today, there are more than 8,000 Nuraghi in Sardinia, though it has been estimated that once the number was more than 30,000. The nuraghi are concentrated most in the north-west and south-
central parts of the island.




 Su Nurraxi. Inside the central tower. The man here is 1.80 m.Another kind of Nuraghe has a corridor or a system of corridors. Some authors are reluctant to place these in the same category as tholos Nuraghe, as there are too many relevant differences, and prefer talking about "Nuraghic village".

Nuraghi appeared on the island in an undetermined epoch (not earlier than 6th millennium BC). Some elements have been dated 3500 BC, but it is supposed that most of them were built from the middle of the Bronze Age (18th-15th centuries BC) to the Late Bronze Age, though many were in continuous use until Rome entered Sardinia (2nd century BC).
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #17 on: September 28, 2008, 11:49:45 am »







               









The uncertain date of the Nuraghi is a constant feature of Sardinian chronologies.

Even though, according to Massimo Pallottino, a scholar of Sardinian prehistory and Etruscologist,
the Nuraghic civilization produced the most advanced and monumental architecture of the period in
the western Mediterranean, including the region of Magna Graecia, of the existing 8000 only a few
have as yet been scientifically excavated.

Interest in Sardinian archaeology has been minimal, except for the black market trade in bronze statues.

The use or meaning of the nuraghe has not been clearly identified: whether a religious temple, or a dwelling, a military stronghold, the house of the chief of the village, the place for the meeting of the wise men or the governors. It could have been as well a combination of all or some of these items.

Some of the nuraghi are, however, in strategic locations from which important passages could be easily controlled.

Undoubtedly nuraghi had a meaningful symbolic content, at least recalling wealth or power, or maybe the establishment of a village (eventually in the dignity of a State-village).

Recent theories are oriented to consider that Sardinian villages might have been federated (very likely they were self-governed) and that the building of these monuments could depend on a prior planned distribution of the territory.

Nuraghic dwellers had developed particular skills in metallurgy, trading for bronze in many areas of the Mediterranean and being consequently a well known people.
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #18 on: September 28, 2008, 11:52:17 am »










                                                  SOME FAMOUS NURAGHI






 

UNESCO World Heritage Site








The most important complex is the Nuraghe in Barumini ( 39°42′21″N, 8°59′26″E), centered around a three-story tower built around 1500s BC. This site was recently made a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
At this site Dr. Giovanni Lilliu discovered a fortified village that in times had been covered by ground and had became a hill.

Other nuraghes are in Serra Orrios, Alghero, Torralba, Macomer, Abbasanta (see Losa and illustration), Orroli, Villanovaforru, Sarroch, Olbia.
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #19 on: September 28, 2008, 11:54:01 am »









                                                       










"Nuraghic people" had developed arts, mainly in the form of little statues in bronze called "bronzetto",
typically representing the chief of the village ("Sardus pater") or hunting or fighting men, animals,
more rarely women.

Other monuments of the Nuragicis' are the so-called "Giants tombs", megaron temples, sacred dwellings,
"sacred wells", sanctuaries, enclosures.

Nuragic art includes stone carvings or statues representing female divinities (Thanit, main religious entity, is a goddess); these works however have often been considered as partly a fruct of relationships with Phoenicians.

It has been recalled that round buildings, or circular plan buildings, are typical of nomad peoples, and indeed ancient Sardinians should effectively have been used to constantly move within their territory for better places
or to avoid invasions or outside for new markets for their bronze.

The Nuraghe is today the symbol of Sardinia and of its unique ethnicity.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2008, 11:56:31 am by Bianca » Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #20 on: September 28, 2008, 12:00:50 pm »









The Tomba del Labirinto
Luzzanas, Sardinia
by Jeff & Kimberly Saward
Reprinted from Caerdroia 35 (2005), pp.5-11.










        T H E   L A B Y R I N T H   I N S C R I B E D   I N S I D E   T O M B A   D E L   L A B I R I N T O
 





                               


LUZZANAS, SARDINIA.

Photo: Jeff Saward, February 2005

The labyrinth incised on the wall of a rock-cut tomb, popularly known as the "Tomba del Labirinto," at Luzzanas on the Mediterranean island of Sardinia, off the west coast of Italy, has been the subject of some discussion ever since it was first 'discovered' and published by the archaeologist Ercole Contu in 1965.(1)

Most notably this debate concerns the age of the inscription and the unusual additional lines extending from the entrance of the labyrinth.

Whilst visiting Sardinia during February 2005, we resolved to find this little-visited labyrinth location,
to study and photograph the inscription, and attempt to clear up at least some of the confusion.
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #21 on: September 28, 2008, 12:03:45 pm »










Finding this site is a challenge. It is not marked on even the most detailed of Sardinian maps, nor mentioned in any of the archaeological guides generally available on the island.

To the best of our knowledge, the first written description of its location was given by David Singmaster in Caerdroia 30, subsequent to his successful visit in 1997, and without his notes and a detailed map of the area we would have struggled to find it.(2)

Luzzanas itself is a vaguely defined area of agricultural land to the south and east of the confluence of the rivers Mannu and Tirso, to the north of the minor road that leads between the villages of Bultei and Benetutti, approximately 20 km northwest of Nuoro. The nearest signposted landmark is the spa building at Terme Aurora, from where any attempt to find the site should begin.

The tomb is situated about 1.2 km to the north of the spa, in open fields, on the southeast bank of the River Tirso.

To find the Tomba del Labirinto, we parked at the gates of a construction site, apparently another uncompleted spa building, at the end of the small road that leads off north, into the fields, opposite
the Terme Aurora spa.

We walked out through the field behind the construction site down to the riverbank and then headed upstream, to the northeast. Following the upper edge of the riverbank for around 600 metres, climbing over or round two field walls along the way, a few scrubby trees and bushes growing around the rock outcrop containing the tomb provides a clue to the exact whereabouts, about 150 metres before the river makes a sharp turn to the northwest.

A small hole, around one metre deep, on the north side of the rock outcrop, leads down into the tomb.

Fortunately there were no livestock in these fields when we visited, but as sheep flocks in Sardinia are usually guarded by 'wild' dogs, which bark and bite, we would advise considerable caution to anybody else attempting to visit this site.

The tomb also contains a number of roosting bats by day, and efforts should be made not to disturb these, or the wasp nests on the ceiling!
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #22 on: September 28, 2008, 12:08:02 pm »





             

               The entrance to the Tomba del Labirinto, looking northwest.

               Photo:
               Jeff Saward, February 2005









The tomb itself is of a remarkable form, popularly known as a Domus de Janas (Fairy House),
consisting of a series of chambers excavated with stone tools and picks directly into solid rock,
usually the limestone that outcrops widely across the island, either underground or directly into
a cliff face.

Well over a thousand of these tombs are known in Sardinia, and they belong to the Ozieri (or San Michele) culture, an advanced society of hunters, herders and farmers who worked copper as well as flint, obsidian and ceramics, and flourished during the Neolithic period, between c.3400 to c.2500 BCE.

Their tombs continued to be used for secondary interments through to the time of the Roman occupation of Sardinia, indeed a few were even re-used during the Early Christian period.

The example at Luzzanas is of the underground type, carved into the limestone that outcrops in the field adjacent to the riverbank. The tomb consists of four or more interconnected chambers, which as they have never been excavated, are still partly filled with soil and debris.

The northernmost chamber was flooded with water on the occasion of our visit in February 2005, although the central and western chambers were essentially dry, if a little damp and muddy.

There is a small hole in the eastern side of the central chamber, which admits a little daylight, but it is difficult to determine if this was the original entrance. Currently, the central chamber, about 2.5 x 1.5 metres wide, is entered through a narrow carved doorway on the south side, from the base of the hole in the rock, which may once have been the original entrance, or a separate ante-chamber, the roof of which has collapsed.

Another chamber, completely filled with debris, leads off from the opposite side of this small chamber, back into the rock outcrop.
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #23 on: September 28, 2008, 12:12:58 pm »





               

                 The interior of theTomba del Labirinto.

                 Photo:
                 Jeff Saward, February 2005









Inside the tomb, the walls of the chambers are essentially plain, apart from the pick and hammer
marks remaining from the original construction of the chambers. However, on the wall on the north-
west side of the central chamber, to the right of the narrow doorway that leads into the western chamber, are a number of items of graffiti.

By far the most prominent, is a labyrinth of 'classical' design, 30 cm wide and 33.5 cm high, the uppermost circuit of which almost reaches the ceiling of the chamber (fig. 1a). The lines that form the labyrinth have clearly been carved by a confident hand with a sharp implement, probably a metal blade, as the groove is fairly consistent in width and is deeply incised (3 to 5 mm deep in places), although the line is shallower in places where the undulating rock surface has caused the carving tool to skip.

As is common with incised labyrinth graffiti of this free-hand nature, the procedure for constructing
the labyrinth design can still be discerned.

The central cross has clearly been constructed first; the lines are somewhat bolder and more deeply incised.

Then the arcs that mark the ends of the path loops have been inserted in the angles of the cross,
and finally, four short strokes have been added to mark the ends of the 'walls' of the labyrinth - the familiar 'seed pattern' encountered worldwide, wherever the classical labyrinth symbol is found. In particular, the central 'seed pattern' of the Luzzanas labyrinth is remarkably similar to the much smaller example inscribed on the Tragliatella vase, although the Luzzanas labyrinth has the opening to the left rather than the right.
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #24 on: September 28, 2008, 12:18:24 pm »





               

                The wall with the labyrinth and other graffiti,
                and a hibernating bat!


                Photo: Jeff Saward, February 2005








In addition to the labyrinth, there are a number of other marks on the rock surface, including a number of linear gouges and deep scratches that may have been made by either human or animal activity in
the tomb over the years, especially lower down on the wall.

To the left and partly overlapping the labyrinth are a number of modern characters and numbers, evidently drawn sometime in the early or mid 20th century, with a thick blue wax crayon, now thank-
fully beginning to flake off from the rock surface in places.

It is known that the tomb was used, prior to its discovery by archaeologists, by local farmers as a shelter in bad weather.(3) Also to the left, and below the labyrinth, are a number of shallow scratch marks, vertical, horizontal and diagonal, that fail to form any obvious coherent pattern, but appear, possibly, to have been scratched in one single episode. Several of these shallow scratches impinge against the outermost circuit of the labyrinth, and two in particular meet at the line leading out from the entrance of the labyrinth.

It is quite clear from their appearance and their shallow grooves, scratched with a sharp point, not deeply carved as is the case with the lines of the labyrinth, that these were surely added at a later time and clearly do not form part of the original labyrinth inscription.

This point is significant, as several authors have commented on these additional lines projecting from the lower edge of the design, assuming they are part of the labyrinth.(4)

Hermann Kern comments that the "guiding line� points left towards the door" to emphasize his point that the location of the labyrinth beside the entrance doorway into the adjacent chamber is "evoking
a door or a threshold through which the deceased had to pass."

This confusion is understandable, as the only photograph of the Luzzanas inscription commonly published is the one supplied by Rainer Pauli in the late 1970's to Kern, that was subsequently reproduced in his monumental Labyrinthe in 1982,(5) and has been widely copied from this source
ever since.

However, this photograph has clearly been 'doctored,' the lines of the labyrinth have been inked-in
to emphasize the design, including the incidental lines that touch the line below the entrance.
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #25 on: September 28, 2008, 12:21:38 pm »





                 

                  The 'enhanced' photo taken by Rainer Pauli in the late 1970's,
                  published by Kern, 1982 - compare with the recent photo
                  at the start of this article.









With this matter resolved, attention must now turn to the question of the age of the Luzzanas labyrinth.

In his original description of the inscription, Contu simply regarded it as prehistoric, though he admits that it could be much more recent, even modern.

Pauli ascribed it to the Early Nuraghic period of Sardinian history, when many of these Neolithic Domus de Janas tombs were re-used, dating the labyrinth to c.1500-1000 BCE, although he provides no evidence of Nuraghic activity at this location to support his dating.(6) Kern on the other hand was clearly convinced that the tomb and the labyrinth on its wall were contemporary, and he gives an implied dating of 2500-2000 BCE, which like his illustration, has been widely and uncritically repeated ever since.

Staffan Lund�n was probably the first to express serious concerns about these differing and rather arbitrary dates, and basing his reasoning on the apparent use of an iron knife blade to carve the labyrinth, suggested a date-range from around 850 BCE, when iron tools first appear in Sardinia, to as late as the 5th century CE.(7) This later date is based on the virtual disappearance of the simple 'classical' labyrinth in the Mediterranean area after the Roman period.

This would certainly seem to be a valid terminal dating, indeed a Roman origin for the Luzzanas labyrinth would seem quite likely, as other Roman labyrinth inscriptions and graffiti are known from around the Mediterranean(Cool and both the labyrinth legend and symbol were clearly widely known at this time. There was a considerable Roman presence in Sardinia(9) and examples of apparent Roman or Punic graffiti are known in other prehistoric tombs on the island.

It is, of course, possible that the labyrinth is relatively recent, but the damp conditions inside the tomb have already smoothed the edges of the carving, and the overlying later additions to the graffiti on the wall are certainly suggestive of a considerable age for the labyrinth itself.

While Lund�n concedes that the labyrinth could have been carved with a sharp stone tool, rather than an iron blade, the notion that the labyrinth is contemporary with the tomb can be almost completely ruled out.

While the majority of the Domus de Janas tombs are entirely plain, apart from the carved doorways between the interconnecting chambers, a small number have extensive carved decoration inside, including bull's heads and stylised bull's horns.

A few are even carved to imitate the interior of contemporary wooden buildings, complete with doorways, windows and roof beams,(10) but the key feature of these Neolithic decorations is that
they are all carved in relief and in a very distinctive style; incised designs like the Luzzanas labyrinth
are unknown in this context.
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #26 on: September 28, 2008, 12:25:57 pm »





               

                The 'enhanced' photo taken by Rainer Pauli in the late 1970's,
                published by Kern, 1982 - compare with the recent photo
                at the start of this article.









With this matter resolved, attention must now turn to the question of the age of the Luzzanas labyrinth. In his original description of the inscription, Contu simply regarded it as prehistoric, though
he admits that it could be much more recent, even modern.

Pauli ascribed it to the Early Nuraghic period of Sardinian history, when many of these Neolithic Domus de Janas tombs were re-used, dating the labyrinth to c.1500-1000 BCE, although he provides no evidence of Nuraghic activity at this location to support his dating.(6)

Kern on the other hand was clearly convinced that the tomb and the labyrinth on its wall were contemporary, and he gives an implied dating of 2500-2000 BCE, which like his illustration, has been widely and uncritically repeated ever since.

Staffan Lund�n was probably the first to express serious concerns about these differing and rather arbitrary dates, and basing his reasoning on the apparent use of an iron knife blade to carve the labyrinth, suggested a date-range from around 850 BCE, when iron tools first appear in Sardinia, to as late as the 5th century CE.(7)

This later date is based on the virtual disappearance of the simple 'classical' labyrinth in the Mediterranean area after the Roman period. This would certainly seem to be a valid terminal dating, indeed a Roman origin for the Luzzanas labyrinth would seem quite likely, as other Roman labyrinth inscriptions and graffiti are known from around the Mediterranean(Cool and both the labyrinth legend and symbol were clearly widely known at this time.

There was a considerable Roman presence in Sardinia(9) and examples of apparent Roman or Punic graffiti are known in other prehistoric tombs on the island. It is, of course, possible that the labyrinth is relatively recent, but the damp conditions inside the tomb have already smoothed the edges of the carving, and the overlying later additions to the graffiti on the wall are certainly suggestive of a considerable age for the labyrinth itself.
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #27 on: September 28, 2008, 12:37:28 pm »










While Lund�n concedes that the labyrinth could have been carved with a sharp stone tool, rather
than an iron blade, the notion that the labyrinth is contemporary with the tomb can be almost completely ruled out.

While the majority of the Domus de Janas tombs are entirely plain, apart from the carved doorways between the interconnecting chambers, a small number have extensive carved decoration inside, including bull's heads and stylised bull's horns.

A few are even carved to imitate the interior of contemporary wooden buildings, complete with doorways, windows and roof beams,(10) but the key feature of these Neolithic decorations is that they are all carved in relief and in a very distinctive style; incised designs like the Luzzanas labyrinth are unknown in this context.





 

Bull's horns decoration inside Domus del'Elefante,
Sardinia







Carved blocks with geometric designs,
Nuraghe Nurdole, Sardina.
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #28 on: September 28, 2008, 12:41:54 pm »










Incised geometric designs are found, however, on ashlar blocks formerly decorating the walls of the
late Bronze Age and early Iron Age Nuraghe towers and temples that form such a distinctive feature
of the Sardinian landscape.(11)

Although many concentric circular designs, coupled with rectangular and diagonal design elements, often very angular and precisely inscribed, are known on both stone and ceramic objects, to date no labyrinths have been reported amongst this Nuragic material, so the Luzzanas inscription would be quite unique if it were from this cultural context and timespan.

There are also occasional incised carvings and graffiti found in association with the late Bronze Age Tomba dei Giganti (Giant's Tombs), including two inscriptions found at Rio di Palmis, near Sulcis, with depictions of people, animals and wheeled carts, which have been compared with the carvings of Val Camonica in Northern Italy(12) - a location famous of course for its labyrinths, the age of which is a matter of some debate, but they may be from around c.700-450 BCE.

We have already noted the apparent similarity between the construction technique of the labyrinth at Luzzanas and the labyrinth incised on the Etruscan Tragliatella vase, found on the west coast of Italy, and dating from c.650-600 BCE.

Another two labyrinths drawn alongside each other in a very similar fashion, albeit inverted, found at Gordion in Turkey, date to around 750 BCE.(13)

While it can be argued that the universal nature of the labyrinth construction technique might render these similarities no more than a coincidence, it is perhaps interesting that four examples, at three locations in the Mediterranean area, two of which are securely dated within a century or so of each other, should be so similar. Perhaps the Luzzanas labyrinth also fits within this timeframe, and this precise way of drawing a freehand labyrinth was the widespread technique in circulation at this time?
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Bianca
Superhero Member
******
Posts: 41646



« Reply #29 on: September 28, 2008, 12:44:41 pm »










Either way, judging on the scant evidence for the dating of the Luzzanas labyrinth, it seems fair to say that it could be from almost anywhere between the early Iron Age, c.900-850 BCE in Sardinia, to the end of the Roman occupation of the island in the early 5th century CE.

Unless future excavation of the Tomba del Labirinto provides some obvious evidence of the visitors that have entered the tomb over the years that can be linked to the labyrinth itself, we will probably never know more precisely than that.

Of course, the question of what the labyrinth on the wall at Luzzanas means is another matter.

Contu, admitting the problems of interpreting the symbol, saw it as a symbol of initiation, life, death
and rebirth, quite at home in the tomb. Kern saw it as a funerary symbol within the "womb of Mother Earth."

Lund�n conjectures that if there were evidence for Roman activity in the tomb, then it might be seen as serving an apotropaic, or protective purpose.

If the labyrinth was carved by a casual visitor to the tomb, long after its original construction, as
seems likely, then maybe this descent through a hole in the ground into an 'underworld' of gloomy
inter connecting chambers reminded them of the Theseus and the Minotaur story, prompting the
carving of the labyrinth on the wall.

If this were the case, then an origin in the second half of the 1st millennium BCE or the Roman period, when these stories were well known in the Mediterranean world, would be all the more likely.




Jeff Saward & Kimberly Lowelle Saward;

Thundersley, England, March 2005

(Revised, May 2006)
Report Spam   Logged

Your mind understands what you have been taught; your heart what is true.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
SMF For Free - Create your own Forum
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy