The site of Stonehenge at sunrise
King of Stonehenge?
The radiocarbon dates show that the Archer lived between 2,400 and 2,200 years BC.
The burial lies about 5km (2 miles) south-east of Stonehenge and it was at about this time that the massive stone circles, and the avenue leading to the River Avon from the site, were built.
The great temples of Woodhenge and Durrington Walls, both a similar distance away, continued to be used and modified throughout this time.
In the past, burials of this date were considered rich if they contained more than a handful of objects, especially if one of the objects was of copper or bronze, or even gold.
Although the finds buried with the Archer are all of well known types (within the Beaker cultural package
that is found across much of central and western Europe at this time), the number of objects found with
him, almost 100, is without compare.
'Had these two men been part of a ruling élite?'
The burial is also one of the earliest of its type in Britain, some of the finds are of the highest quality, and
the gold is the earliest yet found in Britain. Furthermore the copper knives came from Spain and western France - an indication of the wide contacts of their owner.
Above all, though, the associations between these finds are of particular importance.
Can it be a coincidence that the richest Early Bronze Age burial in Britain, and its companion, should be so close to the great temples of Durrington Walls? Had these two men been part of a ruling elite? Had one of them been a king?
