BlueHue,
You are sadly mistaken and are misleading other people!
The Milos conference concluded that Plato's Atlantis did indeed sink approximately 9000 years before Solon. This was one of the twenty-four criteria that the participants agreed upon by consensus.
"The Metropolis of Atlantis was destroyed 9000 years before the 6th century BC."http://milos.conferences.gr/index.php?id=4354.
.
Dear..................MARIO + TOM - - HEBERT ,
I AM Sorry about
the raised misunderstanding: Mistaken about WHAT ? '
Atlantis was NO island in my opinion' If it sunk in the Nile -Delta
like in ABUKIR- Bay(= Heracleapolis minor.)
" GEORGEOS " mentions it was a PENINSULA,
My opinion is that it was a Promotory consisting of a TOMBOLO(= Sunken Volcano,
in the AFAR- Trialgle area)
connected to a mainland but separated from it by a hand dug ISTHUMUS or TRENCH
So both Peninsula and Promotory/ island are right, it was NOT in the Atlantic, but
also not in the Mediaterranean- region. But in the Indian Ocean area.
YOU ARE APPARENTLY also MIS-INFORMED ABOUT THE
RESULTS OF THE MELOS-2005- Conference,
Because The 75 Euro-Book that is issued was too expensive (=100 Euro's including cost and handling.)
SO, is not read by any of the Forum members except '
GEORGEOS '
but he closed his SPECIALLY CREATED website WITH review of the contense
"
GEORGEOS ",
Found satisfaction in the fact that he, before the Conference,
was one of the very few 'professional' Atlantologist to adher to the 900 years issue.
of the 900 bc opinion and they called him an unpleasent person, but after the Conference
the precious-traditional Date of 9.000 Years BEFORE the 6-th century bc ,was abandoned
and discarded in favour of the 900 years before the 6-th century bc.
THORWALD- FRANKE and REINHARD- KUHNE and company are the only ones that
have issued a full review of their Atlantis in Sicilly or Malta Theory.( but in a Labyrinth access fashion.)
Most other Atlantologists have only assumed that by their statement
that ONE of the Isles in the World or the Meditaranean region should be Atlantis
and that was that.
My valid argument is that ALL Atlantologists are barking-up the wrong tree
including the present person whom I am addressing,
Because All Atlantologists simply REFUSE to believe are reluctant to accept
the logicalargument that,
and felt offended
that I tell them that ATLANTIS is a LATIN mistranslation
of the ORIGINAL....GREEK word ATHETA(-Land.)
The COUNTRY named ATHETA(- Land.) Still exists under that name it is
the County surrounding the PORT-of ADEN and is presently named" ATHE "
The rest is history.
The
MILOS Conference did NOT " Conclude "
the List that you refer to,
but it was a forgone PRE-Clusion, that was issued before the Conference had started,
in order, chanell the direction of disc overy and to
" weed-out " run-away-theories !
BECAUSE there was a confusion about the
Small-x or multiple SIGN
in combination with the
BIG- X or TEN-Cypher Sign, used by latin translators.
the TEN_FOLD exaggerations of Plato in
TIME, Number of
INHABITANTS and SIZE-
measurements of the CITY occurred by the LATIN translators.
THIS
MEANS SIMPLY THAT half OF THE REPUTED
25- ATLANTIS
CRITERIA OF Melos conference, ARE INVALID
BUT the HELIOTOPOS Publisher seeded confusion about the latest Consensus to promote his publications !
Sincerely,
"
BlueHue "
dd. 25-June--2008
Post Scriptum,
TOM,
I appreciate your efforts in trying to mend my way,
by your cautious message pre-warning about me about
confusing and misleading other Atlantologists
from walking on the convential road of ancient( atlantis-)history.
but too much
Media-shortage/=Shortening has caused
and still is causing deep historical harm already:
FOR EXAMPLE:
Most atlantologist and newage seekers argue that BACON ( in 1627.)
told his readers that in his opinion America was ancient ATLANTIS.
THIS is such a " Media-SHORTAGE/ Shortening I mean, " BECAUSE "
BACON told his readers that America was like a
NEW- Atlantis for future Utopists.
DO YOU SEE ?
the media leave out just ONE word and the facts get a whole differend meaning.
I learned that I must assume that NO othetr Atlantologist realy is intrested
in my THEORY VERSION, so the best I could do is devise a standard phrase to catch
my
theory, in a nutshell, for even the die-hards of another theory by using the space
of my subscipt to tell my theory, but no Atlantologist was compelled to comment it
Maybe just maybe you are the first to really read and comment on my
nutshell-theory.
BRYNWYNS or whatever was trying to force the
25 or 50 Reference-points on me
but did not wait for my answerering them alternatively.
