From the link provided by Catastrophe:
http://www.thehallofmaat.com/maat/read.php?f=1&i=99738&t=99738 Quote from John Anthony West (Hall of Maat), concerning the attacks on the Inventory Stela there:
http://www.thehallofmaat.com/maat/read.php?f=1&i=99738&t=99738 quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I got halfway through this eternal foolishness and gave up.
Tell me: does anyone in this discussion point out that the date of the
Inventory Stela is not the issue but rather the validity of the information
-- which is impossible to determine. To dismiss it because of its Late
Kingdom date is like having only a 20th Century translation of the Bible
available and concluding from that, that the Bible is a 20th century document
because of the language.
The Inventory Stela is a suggestive piece to the puzzle, no more than that,
and we have never claimed otherwise. Without it, the geologiy would still be
the geology. Until ***an and the Ma'at pack of attack Chihuahuas find a way
to explain away the differential weathering to the Sphinx enclosure wall
(along with the other extensive marshaled array of geological evidence) the
geology stands and refutes the argument from archeological context. "
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Anthony West, you have to love him!